Certainly not true in the DCUM demographic, where the women are highly educated professionals. |
|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Who are these women that all think they’re top 1% for looks and income?? If you’re on DCUM, you’re not. I work with women who are legit top 1% in looks and wealth, and I promise they ain’t on here. You’re probably like me - the prettiest in your high school class, maybe did some modeling, now make 6 figures. Sorry, but we’re nowhere near the top.
Also pretty horrible to teach your daughters to think this way. My parents drilled it into me that because I was beautiful and came from a wealthy family, I needed to find an attractive, wealthy man. It screwed me up BAD and it took me until my mid-30s to learn what it actually important in a partner. [/quote] I said I was top 1% brains and top 10% looks. Never said I was top 1% looks. I am not. Dh is top 1% income and we are in top 1% NW.[/quote] Sorry but unless you’re a 25 year old model, you’re not top 10% looks. And top 1% brains people are NOT on DCUM. This is not a place where geniuses hang out. Really wish women would get over their need to be competitive. No one cares how pretty you are, how smart you are, or how rich and special your H is. |
If she’s not lying about her husband job and income, it’s totally possible that a high server married a not trashy looking lady. Also, the top law schools girls crowd tends to be better looking than average. I went to my reunion and all female classmates still look very decent in their 40s. They work, dress nicely, workout, have resources for cosmetic surgery. |
High earner, typo |
He’d be eating his meal. Not his date’s meal. |
|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Who are these women that all think they’re top 1% for looks and income?? If you’re on DCUM, you’re not. I work with women who are legit top 1% in looks and wealth, and I promise they ain’t on here. You’re probably like me - the prettiest in your high school class, maybe did some modeling, now make 6 figures. Sorry, but we’re nowhere near the top.
Also pretty horrible to teach your daughters to think this way. My parents drilled it into me that because I was beautiful and came from a wealthy family, I needed to find an attractive, wealthy man. It screwed me up BAD and it took me until my mid-30s to learn what it actually important in a partner. [/quote] I said I was top 1% brains and top 10% looks. Never said I was top 1% looks. I am not. Dh is top 1% income and we are in top 1% NW.[/quote] Sorry but unless you’re a 25 year old model, you’re not top 10% looks. And top 1% brains people are NOT on DCUM. This is not a place where geniuses hang out. Really wish women would get over their need to be competitive. No one cares how pretty you are, how smart you are, or how rich and special your H is. [/quote] She probably meant top 1% for her age . |
There’s really very little to differentiate the two. |
This is that delusional Russian. |
Any guy who is cheap enough to feel bitter for $30 tapas I ate at second date belongs to streets. Not place for him in my life |
A non trashy escort in DC charges thousands per night. Go hire someone if you can afford it and don’t complain. Also stop dating if the rules of the game irritate you. |
The bolded is absolutely not true. "Not trashy looking" is not 9/10. "Very decent in their 40s" is not 9/10. Amal Clooney isn't even 9/10. There's a lawyer for you. People truly lack perspective here or are deluding themselves. Not everyone needs to be the honest, brightest, sexiest. It'll be ok. |
Except you'll get better value for money from a prostitute than a dinner date. |
What "the rules" are, and should be, is the point of this thread. Not even all women agree that "the man should pay" is the rule. |
You are owed nothing. |
I’m a married woman, no need for dates/hookers. |