Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My summary to date:

Adam Schiff: #TreasonousTrump can’t be a president doing pay for play and using classified info for personal gain, we won’t get over and turn a blind eye to matters of National SECURITY. Trump’s activities are challenging the republic Ben franklin challenged American citizens to keep: a republic. Where it’s vague, definition of what is acceptable will be sought with public engagement from the American republic branch of powers,.

Davin Nunes:
Get over it, deal with it, you guys do bad stuff too, and you’ve been plotting this whole thing from the beginning. You’re all on a warpath and acting like babies.

Things are moving fast.

We will see if the billionaires are getting their money's worth with these Republicans. This is what the Republicans took away from the Nixon impeachment - never give up the ship, keep the con going as long as possible.

Money ain’t worth nothing 6 feet under. National security (protection from harm/death) supports life.

Still an accurate read.

report

11/20/2019 14:33

Subject: Re:Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:Sorry broken picture link

Bumping

report

11/20/2019 14:33

Subject: Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/1197233289347518464

Criminals are going to be very excited about this new legal principle that if you verbally deny the crime you are committing while you are committing it, you are innocent.

Exactly. It’s like the Shaggy defense. “Say it wasn’t you.”

report

11/20/2019 14:33

Subject: Re:Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:NEW testimony today from Taylor - his staff in Ukraine heard Trump on the phone ask Sondland about "the investigations" the day after the July 25 phone call

Bump

report

11/20/2019 14:34

Subject: Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:Sondland hotel protests: https://www.thedailybeast.com/people-are-absolutely-trashing-gordon-sondlands-hotels-on-yelp

In case anyone wants to make sure they don't stay at the poor guy's hotels, the list is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Sondland

poor guy my patootie

he bought himself an ambassadorship with this disgraceful administration for $1 million. dude brought this on himself, and is going to be fine

report

11/20/2019 14:34

Subject: Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nunes has already told 3 material lies in his opening statement.

Nope. He has stated the truth.

At least Schiff did not make up dialogue today and attribute it to President Trump.

1) Nunes claims Dems didn't have more than circumstantial evidence of collusion, when in fact, evidence in the Stone trial more than meets Mark Meadows' definition of collusion.
2) Mueller said there was evidence of conspiracy, which is stronger than collusion.
3) Nunes claims there were 1-sided leaks, this is false.
4) Nunes claims GOP witnesses denied. They got 3 witnesses.
5) Nunes falsely claims Mark Zaid called for a coup. He never did that.
6) Nunes claimed Steele dossier equals collusion with Russia - false
7) Nunes claimed the Dems defend Hunter Biden having a job, false.
8) Nunes claimed witnesses don't know the answers on Hunter Biden, except a number of witnesses did testify to it.
9) Nunes claimed "Russian hoax" has ended, nope the Intel Community has stated it is ongoing.

I could go on, but this is laughable that someone would claim he is stating the truth.

Bump

report

11/20/2019 14:36

Subject: Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous

Stop bumping! The thread is long enough already. People will read what they want to.

report

11/20/2019 14:38

Subject: Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What proof is there that Schiff met with, or knows who the Whsitleblower is directly? None. Conjecture and another distraction from the core story.

We'll never know since Schiff won't testify and he will not let the WB testify. At least one of his staffers knows who it is.

And, if Schiff doesn't know who it is, how is he going to prevent members of Congress from stating his name or referring them for an ethics violation? How will he know?

The whistleblower followed the correct protocol. This has been confirmed many times. Multiple witnesses and Trump himself have confirmed the whistleblower's allegations. The kerfuffle about the whistleblower is nothing more than another asinine attempt by the GOP to distract from the wrongdoing of this POTUS. They want to out the whistleblower, so that they can attack him/her and try to pretend that that would negate the reality of what Trump did, i.e., provide more distractions from the truth. They don't care that if they try to focus the attention on the whistleblower, they will put him/her in danger from all the crazy Trump fans. The POTUS himself made a threat on the whistleblower's life. The protection of the whistleblower is important for that person's safety and for the safety of future whistleblowers.