Muslim and Arab Killings in the US

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?

Except he globalist said guys named Mohammed would not hold security jobs. So much for that. I expect Ehud and LaShonda to do their security jobs well too

Security CLEARANCE jobs, dumbass. Not security jobs.

The job of who we let through security in airports is critical. If we give that to Mohammed, that says something

It says that the perceived slights against Muslims are unfounded?

It says a man named Muhammed can get hired for jobs that involve putting people on planes after a major terrorist attack

Well obviously. I'm trying to figure out if your argument is that a) there is no discrimination or anti-muslim sentiment or b) there is discrimination and anti-muslim sentiment but it's not a big deal.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It says a man named Muhammed can get hired for jobs that involve putting people on planes after a major terrorist attack

What do you think the chances are of Muhammed keeping his job during a Trump administration? Presumably Muhammed passed the same background check required for everyone else who has the same job. Trump would likely expect a more stringent (and expensive) background check which would create an incentive for whomever pays for such checks to avoid hiring "Muhammeds" in the future.

Excellent. Unless he continues to perform his job in the apathetic way he did with me. But then, it would not be his name that got him fired

I feel you have your own biases that you cannot see

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?

Except he globalist said guys named Mohammed would not hold security jobs. So much for that. I expect Ehud and LaShonda to do their security jobs well too

Security CLEARANCE jobs, dumbass. Not security jobs.

The job of who we let through security in airports is critical. If we give that to Mohammed, that says something

It says that the perceived slights against Muslims are unfounded?

It says a man named Muhammed can get hired for jobs that involve putting people on planes after a major terrorist attack

Well obviously. I'm trying to figure out if your argument is that a) there is no discrimination or anti-muslim sentiment or b) there is discrimination and anti-muslim sentiment but it's not a big deal.

My argument is that liberals can find racism anytime, anywhere due to extreme hypersensitivity. Call someone a racist enough, they will learn to dislike you, and it won't be due to race. It will be due to your judgmental attitude and labeling

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?

Except he globalist said guys named Mohammed would not hold security jobs. So much for that. I expect Ehud and LaShonda to do their security jobs well too

Security CLEARANCE jobs, dumbass. Not security jobs.

The job of who we let through security in airports is critical. If we give that to Mohammed, that says something

It says that the perceived slights against Muslims are unfounded?

It says a man named Muhammed can get hired for jobs that involve putting people on planes after a major terrorist attack

Well obviously. I'm trying to figure out if your argument is that a) there is no discrimination or anti-muslim sentiment or b) there is discrimination and anti-muslim sentiment but it's not a big deal.

My argument is that liberals can find racism anytime, anywhere due to extreme hypersensitivity. Call someone a racist enough, they will learn to dislike you, and it won't be due to race. It will be due to your judgmental attitude and labeling

Da hell is you talking about everybody is judgemental it ain't just liberals you doofus.
Shit if you go to Equador and visit the indigenous tribe in the Amazon rain forest, the Achuar, and they will judge your ass five seconds after you step foot in the village despite not having any modern day political ideologies.
It's human nature. Only reason you may not be offended by their judgements is cause your A) arrogant ass would think you're above them so their "primitive" opinions don't mean shit or cause B) your arrogant ass would think since they aren't speaking English and you can't understand them they aren't saying anything worthwhile.
Only reason you're perturbed about liberals judgements is cause deep down you don't feel superior and deep down you suspect they may have a point.
If you really thought they were as stupid and as primitive as you portray them to be you wouldn't be whining about what they say so much cause you wouldn't give a shit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?

Except he globalist said guys named Mohammed would not hold security jobs. So much for that. I expect Ehud and LaShonda to do their security jobs well too

Security CLEARANCE jobs, dumbass. Not security jobs.

The job of who we let through security in airports is critical. If we give that to Mohammed, that says something

It says that the perceived slights against Muslims are unfounded?

It says a man named Muhammed can get hired for jobs that involve putting people on planes after a major terrorist attack

Well obviously. I'm trying to figure out if your argument is that a) there is no discrimination or anti-muslim sentiment or b) there is discrimination and anti-muslim sentiment but it's not a big deal.

My argument is that liberals can find racism anytime, anywhere due to extreme hypersensitivity. Call someone a racist enough, they will learn to dislike you, and it won't be due to race. It will be due to your judgmental attitude and labeling

So "a" then.

[Anonymous]

When libs feel they are discriminated against because of their hypersensitive feelings and racism they show all too well they get mean and become cyber bullies or real bullies as shown at trump rallies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When libs feel they are discriminated against because of their hypersensitive feelings and racism they show all too well they get mean and become cyber bullies or real bullies as shown at trump rallies

Substitute "immature self-conscious assholes" for "libs" and you'll have an arguably accurate statement.
Conservatives are not immune to hypersensitivity and temper tantrums.
Neither are communists or socialists or environmentalists or anarchists.
A person's political ideology doesn't have jack shit to do with their character or temperament or tendencies to act a damn fool when they don't get their way, that shit expands across all races and religions and classes and principles and doctrines.
People from all walks of life are ignorant and irritating as your comment proves indubitably.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When libs feel they are discriminated against because of their hypersensitive feelings and racism they show all too well they get mean and become cyber bullies or real bullies as shown at trump rallies

Substitute "immature self-conscious assholes" for "libs" and you'll have an arguably accurate statement.
Conservatives are not immune to hypersensitivity and temper tantrums.
Neither are communists or socialists or environmentalists or anarchists.
A person's political ideology doesn't have jack shit to do with their character or temperament or tendencies to act a damn fool when they don't get their way, that shit expands across all races and religions and classes and principles and doctrines.
People from all walks of life are ignorant and irritating as your comment proves indubitably.

Do you read? I said when libs FEEL they are discriminated against they act hypocritical as is evidence when they become cyber bullies on forums like this one. I was specific. As a whole everyone can have a temper no shit sherlock

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:
Do you read? I said when libs FEEL they are discriminated against they act hypocritical as is evidence when they become cyber bullies on forums like this one. I was specific. As a whole everyone can have a temper no shit sherlock

Let it be noted that "cons" -- you know, those tough, self-sufficient, independent hardcore individuals with no patience for political correctness -- consider "bullying" to be nothing more than challenging their assertions. I am the only one here who is identified by race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc. No conservative is being "bullied" for their religion or race or a disability they have. All that is happening is objections to their own words are being posted. But, that is "cyberbullying". Apparently, "con" feelings are too sensitive for their opinions to be contradicted in public, even when they are anonymous. That's bullying!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When libs feel they are discriminated against because of their hypersensitive feelings and racism they show all too well they get mean and become cyber bullies or real bullies as shown at trump rallies

Substitute "immature self-conscious assholes" for "libs" and you'll have an arguably accurate statement.
Conservatives are not immune to hypersensitivity and temper tantrums.
Neither are communists or socialists or environmentalists or anarchists.
A person's political ideology doesn't have jack shit to do with their character or temperament or tendencies to act a damn fool when they don't get their way, that shit expands across all races and religions and classes and principles and doctrines.
People from all walks of life are ignorant and irritating as your comment proves indubitably.

Do you read? I said when libs FEEL they are discriminated against they act hypocritical as is evidence when they become cyber bullies on forums like this one. I was specific. As a whole everyone can have a temper no shit sherlock

Okay so the F what if you said "when libs FEEL so-and-so they act hypocritical"...
The same shit can be said about pacifists - when they FEEL threatened they may act hypocritical and beat your ass!
When priests FEEL horny they may act hypocritical and say to hell with celibacy I'm gonna pick up a hooker!
When vegans FEEL hungry they may act hypocritical and order a damn cheeseburger!
You sound stupid just shut up and stop trying to save face you're making it worse.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Do you read? I said when libs FEEL they are discriminated against they act hypocritical as is evidence when they become cyber bullies on forums like this one. I was specific. As a whole everyone can have a temper no shit sherlock

Let it be noted that "cons" -- you know, those tough, self-sufficient, independent hardcore individuals with no patience for political correctness -- consider "bullying" to be nothing more than challenging their assertions. I am the only one here who is identified by race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc. No conservative is being "bullied" for their religion or race or a disability they have. All that is happening is objections to their own words are being posted. But, that is "cyberbullying". Apparently, "con" feelings are too sensitive for their opinions to be contradicted in public, even when they are anonymous. That's bullying!

Lol you are wrong. That thread of the nude trump is bullying too.surprised you don't know what it means.

Cyberbullying is bullying that takes place using electronic technology. Electronic technology includes devices and equipment such as cell phones, computers, and tablets as well as communication tools including social media sites, text messages, chat, and websites.
Examples of cyberbullying include mean text messages or emails, rumors sent by email or posted on social networking sites, and embarrassing pictures, videos, websites, or fake profiles.

Stopbullying.gov

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When libs feel they are discriminated against because of their hypersensitive feelings and racism they show all too well they get mean and become cyber bullies or real bullies as shown at trump rallies

Substitute "immature self-conscious assholes" for "libs" and you'll have an arguably accurate statement.
Conservatives are not immune to hypersensitivity and temper tantrums.
Neither are communists or socialists or environmentalists or anarchists.
A person's political ideology doesn't have jack shit to do with their character or temperament or tendencies to act a damn fool when they don't get their way, that shit expands across all races and religions and classes and principles and doctrines.
People from all walks of life are ignorant and irritating as your comment proves indubitably.

Do you read? I said when libs FEEL they are discriminated against they act hypocritical as is evidence when they become cyber bullies on forums like this one. I was specific. As a whole everyone can have a temper no shit sherlock

Okay so the F what if you said "when libs FEEL so-and-so they act hypocritical"...
The same shit can be said about pacifists - when they FEEL threatened they may act hypocritical and beat your ass!
When priests FEEL horny they may act hypocritical and say to hell with celibacy I'm gonna pick up a hooker!
When vegans FEEL hungry they may act hypocritical and order a damn cheeseburger!
You sound stupid just shut up and stop trying to save face you're making it worse.

Whoa there goes your temper. (Backing away slowly)

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Do you read? I said when libs FEEL they are discriminated against they act hypocritical as is evidence when they become cyber bullies on forums like this one. I was specific. As a whole everyone can have a temper no shit sherlock

Let it be noted that "cons" -- you know, those tough, self-sufficient, independent hardcore individuals with no patience for political correctness -- consider "bullying" to be nothing more than challenging their assertions. I am the only one here who is identified by race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc. No conservative is being "bullied" for their religion or race or a disability they have. All that is happening is objections to their own words are being posted. But, that is "cyberbullying". Apparently, "con" feelings are too sensitive for their opinions to be contradicted in public, even when they are anonymous. That's bullying!

Lol you are wrong. That thread of the nude trump is bullying too.surprised you don't know what it means.

Cyberbullying is bullying that takes place using electronic technology. Electronic technology includes devices and equipment such as cell phones, computers, and tablets as well as communication tools including social media sites, text messages, chat, and websites.
Examples of cyberbullying include mean text messages or emails, rumors sent by email or posted on social networking sites, and embarrassing pictures, videos, websites, or fake profiles.

Stopbullying.gov

Are you saying that Trump is being bullied? There is probably nothing that would bother me less than Trump being cyberbullied. If you are being bullied, please point out an example.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When libs feel they are discriminated against because of their hypersensitive feelings and racism they show all too well they get mean and become cyber bullies or real bullies as shown at trump rallies

Substitute "immature self-conscious assholes" for "libs" and you'll have an arguably accurate statement.
Conservatives are not immune to hypersensitivity and temper tantrums.
Neither are communists or socialists or environmentalists or anarchists.
A person's political ideology doesn't have jack shit to do with their character or temperament or tendencies to act a damn fool when they don't get their way, that shit expands across all races and religions and classes and principles and doctrines.
People from all walks of life are ignorant and irritating as your comment proves indubitably.

Do you read? I said when libs FEEL they are discriminated against they act hypocritical as is evidence when they become cyber bullies on forums like this one. I was specific. As a whole everyone can have a temper no shit sherlock

Okay so the F what if you said "when libs FEEL so-and-so they act hypocritical"...
The same shit can be said about pacifists - when they FEEL threatened they may act hypocritical and beat your ass!
When priests FEEL horny they may act hypocritical and say to hell with celibacy I'm gonna pick up a hooker!
When vegans FEEL hungry they may act hypocritical and order a damn cheeseburger!
You sound stupid just shut up and stop trying to save face you're making it worse.

Whoa there goes your temper. (Backing away slowly)

Lol you got a lot to learn about discerning anger versus impatience.
Yeah I'm coming across about as blunt as your immensely thick skull cause I have no softheartedness whatsoever when it comes to stupidity but don't get it twisted...you aren't even remotely significant enough to furrow my brow.

[Anonymous]

Is this the face of Islam? He certainly thinks so:

http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2016/08/18/anjem-choudarys-wife-faces-police-investigation-filthy-jews-tirade/