Again, why are you defending a child molester and finding ways to excuse his behavior? This is entirely different from people sleeping with relatives - he literally shared a bed only with pre-pubescent boys who later explained in excruciatingly painful detail what Michael did to them while in bed with them. |
He was acquitted on all 14 charges in court because the allegations were baseless and crumbled under cross examination. Maybe develop some brain cells and critical thinking ability before spreading horrible lies about a dead man. |
That was one trial and acquitted does not mean innocent. Are you the person defending OJ Simpson also because he was acquitted? Seriously crazy that you are dismissing all of the victims based on one acquittal. You must be getting paid by Michael's estate. Read anything by Maureen Orth, a journalist who has done investigative reporting on Michael over many years. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2009/06/michael-jackson-is-gone-but-the-sad-facts-remain You are the one who is lacking critical thinking ability. |
This is my first time posting here, but I agree with you. The justice system is not perfect and one acquittal is hardly a guarantee that someone didn't commit the crime. As much as I like his music, he was a deeply troubled man who very likely molested children. |
To be clear, you're equating children in the third world sleeping in the same bed as their father with random children sleeping in the same bed as a celebrity? Really? |
|
He grew up in a 2 bedroom house with 10-11 people. It’s normal that he slept in the same bed as his brothers and continued that routine in hotel rooms and on the road.
You’d be surprised how much childhood routines become desired by adults. He was known for even including Bubbles, the chimp in a crib in his house. He was called wacko Jacko because he was weird. I’m not sure if he was a child molestor. He comes off as asexual to me if anything. A real molestor wouldn’t be so obvious about their love of children because they don’t wanna be discovered. Most molestors operate in the shadows |
100% |
|
Being a weirdo does NOT make you a predator.
Allegations are NOT convictions. |
This is not a gift link |
| 55 year old and I like his music but I’m not a super fan. I think he was weird, stunted and highly inappropriate with children, in a way that harmed them. But I do not think he was a sexual molestor. |
Yes, his dad even admitted it. He said he didn’t hit the girls only his sons. When asked if he’d hit his grandkids, he said he would never He also interestingly pushed back on Michael’s claims that he was lonely and didkt have a childhood stating Michael always had a normal and fun childhood and even went to high school in LA until age 18 and played basketball and other sports so he was always around other kids all the time. I looked it up and Michael did attend Montclair prep along with Kathy Hilton, paris’ mom |
| If this is true, it doesn’t bode well for Michaels justification for being around kids (not kids but boys) all the time. |
It fits that he would lie to cover up his perverse fetishes and attractions. People really bought into the narrative and then looked the other way, which seemed to be by design. |
| If this was some random dude in your neighborhood, would those who protest his innocence allow their kids there? I highly doubt it. People will defend a lot to enjoy some music guilt-free. Plenty of less problematic artists out there for me to enjoy. |
Agreed. Particularly that he comes off as asexual. |