Is Frumin running again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

Please list 5 of Frumin’s accomplishments on behalf of his ward 3 constituents. How has he made things better since Mary Cheh left? Can anyone highlight his accomplishments??

What were Mary Cheh’s five accomplishments?

What were Jack Evans’?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

Please list 5 of Frumin’s accomplishments on behalf of his ward 3 constituents. How has he made things better since Mary Cheh left? Can anyone highlight his accomplishments??

What were Mary Cheh’s five accomplishments?

What were Jack Evans’?

Liberal by any standard, Mary was able to serve as a circuit breaker for some of the Councils worst instincts on crime, vouchers, and sanctuary city issues. Frumin completely lacks the knowledge or courage to push back on the socialist tendencies of the current Council and Ward 3 is worse for it.

[Anonymous]

Frumin is as useless as Mary Cheh as for Ward 3. they both are idealists who are trying to make the district better (according to their own socialist view of the world) but have no agenda that is specific to Ward 3. Why does every other ward get a council person focused on the needs of their local community but somehow Ward 3 effectively gets another at large council person?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

Please list 5 of Frumin’s accomplishments on behalf of his ward 3 constituents. How has he made things better since Mary Cheh left? Can anyone highlight his accomplishments??

What were Mary Cheh’s five accomplishments?

What were Jack Evans’?

Liberal by any standard, Mary was able to serve as a circuit breaker for some of the Councils worst instincts on crime, vouchers, and sanctuary city issues. Frumin completely lacks the knowledge or courage to push back on the socialist tendencies of the current Council and Ward 3 is worse for it.

“Circuit breaker”? Seriously?

In other words, you can’t name a single tangible thing that she did. That’s OK, I can’t either.

Despite what you’d like to believe, the DC Council and its constituent members really doesn’t matter much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frumin is as useless as Mary Cheh as for Ward 3. they both are idealists who are trying to make the district better (according to their own socialist view of the world) but have no agenda that is specific to Ward 3. Why does every other ward get a council person focused on the needs of their local community but somehow Ward 3 effectively gets another at large council person?

I’m genuinely curious as to which council members - past or present - personify what you would like to see in a ward representative.

Trayvon White? Jack Evans?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

+1

It is clear the person smearing the DC Crime reform bill never read it, never listened to any of the hearings and testimony which shaped it, not understands the latest theories in crime prevention and criminolgy to understand what the bill actually said and did. And instead, relies on "fox news" style talking points, which is the path of least resistance on a message board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frumin is as useless as Mary Cheh as for Ward 3. they both are idealists who are trying to make the district better (according to their own socialist view of the world) but have no agenda that is specific to Ward 3. Why does every other ward get a council person focused on the needs of their local community but somehow Ward 3 effectively gets another at large council person?

I don't see where Frumin is any different for Ward 3 than any other Ward Councilmember is for their ward. He has a strong constituent services team that are responsive to calls and emails from constituents which is the primary role for a Councilmember. The rest is just representative government voting for different bills that come out of different committees that the mayor may, or may not, sign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

Please list 5 of Frumin’s accomplishments on behalf of his ward 3 constituents. How has he made things better since Mary Cheh left? Can anyone highlight his accomplishments??

What were Mary Cheh’s five accomplishments?

What were Jack Evans’?

Liberal by any standard, Mary was able to serve as a circuit breaker for some of the Councils worst instincts on crime, vouchers, and sanctuary city issues. Frumin completely lacks the knowledge or courage to push back on the socialist tendencies of the current Council and Ward 3 is worse for it.

ironic statement given she gave up her office when she was criticized for comments she made about new voucher residents in her neighborhood - so she wasn't able to stop what you are calling the council's worst instincts and it cost her seat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

Please list 5 of Frumin’s accomplishments on behalf of his ward 3 constituents. How has he made things better since Mary Cheh left? Can anyone highlight his accomplishments??

What were Mary Cheh’s five accomplishments?

What were Jack Evans’?

Liberal by any standard, Mary was able to serve as a circuit breaker for some of the Councils worst instincts on crime, vouchers, and sanctuary city issues. Frumin completely lacks the knowledge or courage to push back on the socialist tendencies of the current Council and Ward 3 is worse for it.

ironic statement given she gave up her office when she was criticized for comments she made about new voucher residents in her neighborhood - so she wasn't able to stop what you are calling the council's worst instincts and it cost her seat.

She did what she could in ways large and small. Frumin, not so much.

https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/574278/cheh-sounds-the-alarm-on-enfranchisement-of-undocumented-residents/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

Please list 5 of Frumin’s accomplishments on behalf of his ward 3 constituents. How has he made things better since Mary Cheh left? Can anyone highlight his accomplishments??

What were Mary Cheh’s five accomplishments?

What were Jack Evans’?

Liberal by any standard, Mary was able to serve as a circuit breaker for some of the Councils worst instincts on crime, vouchers, and sanctuary city issues. Frumin completely lacks the knowledge or courage to push back on the socialist tendencies of the current Council and Ward 3 is worse for it.

ironic statement given she gave up her office when she was criticized for comments she made about new voucher residents in her neighborhood - so she wasn't able to stop what you are calling the council's worst instincts and it cost her seat.

Yes. The other poster seems to believe Ward 3 constitutes some kind of jurisdiction and can take its ball and go home if it doesn’t like what the city is foisting upon it. Ward 3 is far wealthier and whiter than anywhere else in the city. The optics of Ward 3 NiMBYs screaming bloody murder about housing vouchers are horrendous. The evisceration of Mary Cheh after she raised a few valid complaints was a lesson that Matt Frumin has wisely heeded. Doing the kinds of things that the other poster apparently wanted would have worked out very badly for the residents of the ward.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frumin is as useless as Mary Cheh as for Ward 3. they both are idealists who are trying to make the district better (according to their own socialist view of the world) but have no agenda that is specific to Ward 3. Why does every other ward get a council person focused on the needs of their local community but somehow Ward 3 effectively gets another at large council person?

I’m genuinely curious as to which council members - past or present - personify what you would like to see in a ward representative.

Trayvon White? Jack Evans?

There is no winning with the DC Council and its members, past and present. There are only varying degrees of losing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frumin is as useless as Mary Cheh as for Ward 3. they both are idealists who are trying to make the district better (according to their own socialist view of the world) but have no agenda that is specific to Ward 3. Why does every other ward get a council person focused on the needs of their local community but somehow Ward 3 effectively gets another at large council person?

I don't see where Frumin is any different for Ward 3 than any other Ward Councilmember is for their ward. He has a strong constituent services team that are responsive to calls and emails from constituents which is the primary role for a Councilmember. The rest is just representative government voting for different bills that come out of different committees that the mayor may, or may not, sign.

Where do committees come from?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

Please list 5 of Frumin’s accomplishments on behalf of his ward 3 constituents. How has he made things better since Mary Cheh left? Can anyone highlight his accomplishments??

What were Mary Cheh’s five accomplishments?

What were Jack Evans’?

Liberal by any standard, Mary was able to serve as a circuit breaker for some of the Councils worst instincts on crime, vouchers, and sanctuary city issues. Frumin completely lacks the knowledge or courage to push back on the socialist tendencies of the current Council and Ward 3 is worse for it.

ironic statement given she gave up her office when she was criticized for comments she made about new voucher residents in her neighborhood - so she wasn't able to stop what you are calling the council's worst instincts and it cost her seat.

Yes. The other poster seems to believe Ward 3 constitutes some kind of jurisdiction and can take its ball and go home if it doesn’t like what the city is foisting upon it. Ward 3 is far wealthier and whiter than anywhere else in the city. The optics of Ward 3 NiMBYs screaming bloody murder about housing vouchers are horrendous. The evisceration of Mary Cheh after she raised a few valid complaints was a lesson that Matt Frumin has wisely heeded. Doing the kinds of things that the other poster apparently wanted would have worked out very badly for the residents of the ward.

If you want to literally hear people screaming bloody murder come hang out in the lobby of Connecticut House on the weekends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

Please list 5 of Frumin’s accomplishments on behalf of his ward 3 constituents. How has he made things better since Mary Cheh left? Can anyone highlight his accomplishments??

What were Mary Cheh’s five accomplishments?

What were Jack Evans’?

Liberal by any standard, Mary was able to serve as a circuit breaker for some of the Councils worst instincts on crime, vouchers, and sanctuary city issues. Frumin completely lacks the knowledge or courage to push back on the socialist tendencies of the current Council and Ward 3 is worse for it.

ironic statement given she gave up her office when she was criticized for comments she made about new voucher residents in her neighborhood - so she wasn't able to stop what you are calling the council's worst instincts and it cost her seat.

Yes. The other poster seems to believe Ward 3 constitutes some kind of jurisdiction and can take its ball and go home if it doesn’t like what the city is foisting upon it. Ward 3 is far wealthier and whiter than anywhere else in the city. The optics of Ward 3 NiMBYs screaming bloody murder about housing vouchers are horrendous. The evisceration of Mary Cheh after she raised a few valid complaints was a lesson that Matt Frumin has wisely heeded. Doing the kinds of things that the other poster apparently wanted would have worked out very badly for the residents of the ward.

If you want to literally hear people screaming bloody murder come hang out in the lobby of Connecticut House on the weekends.

It's not a great situation, by any means. But a Ward 3 council-member sounding off publicly about the shortcomings of the program would be counter-productive. As we know from Cheh.

Ward 3 residents should certainly be asking Frumin privately about what he is doing about the issue. But he's wise not to be litigating this on social media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen any new crime spikes in Ward 3.

If there are businesses closing, it is a macroeconomic issue, that said, Frumin got expanded support for the different Main Street organizations across the Ward as well as the new BID in Friednship Heights.

There is only so much a Councilmember can do - they are not the Mayor where MPD is concerned, nor in terms of managing projects like the DC Water culvert on Albemarle Street, where the contractor has run into a number of issues that were not identified when the project was being scoped out more than 4 years ago.

Yes, crime spiked during Frumin's tenure and remains higher than before he was in office. Easily found by checking DC crime cards. And, more importantly, crime went up in Ward 3 while going down in others. https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/dated::10122022:10122025/in:Ward:3 Indeed, he should be accountable. He votes on crime bills, no?

You seem to suggest it just happened out of the blue. Of course, Frumin is to blame because he supports policy that directly correlate with that increase in crime. There is cause and effect at this point. If you look at a crime map for Ward 3 and track the incidents, you will find that many take place along the Connecticut Ave NW corridor near the voucher buildings. There are homicides in location where there never were in the decades prior.

All crime in ward 3 is up by almost 20 percent during the 3 year period (ending today) compared to the previous 3-year period. What has he ever done to tackle crime in the Ward, particularly in the areas where it has increased more dramatically? If crime rates are dropping now, we can attribute it to Draconian policing and not Frumin.

On the projects, the funding of the projects could be halted while the issue is sorted, no? Why should taxpayers bear that burden? How is Frumin helping us? How is he making Ward 3 safer for its residents?

This is nonsense.

You want to blame Frumin for policies that you believe increased crime in Ward 3 a couple of years ago, but not give him any credit for policies that you believe decreased crime in Ward 3 this year?

News flash: Frumin had nothing to do with any of these policies and neither does any single council-member.

You may have your issues with the way the city goes about housing formerly-homeless people and that’s fine. Many people from across the political spectrum have criticized how the program is run. After all, the only reason that Frumin is now the council-member is that his predecessor leveled a few criticisms of her own and got so much blowback she decided to quit the council.

In the off chance that you do actually care about the voucher program (rather than just trying to smear Frumin), I’d recommend you look into who actually administers it and take your issues up with them.

-1. Beyond being a cheerleader for the voucher program, Frumin literally cosponsored the legislation that decriminalized street vending. The result? Every convenience store and CVS in Ward 3 were looted regularly for two years. Some stores closed. All now lock up their merchandise. We all pay more because of this. Of course he famously voted in favor that disastrous crime “reform” bill. His instincts on crime policy are almost always wrong. We cannot have another four years of him.

Dollars to donuts you have absolutely no idea what was in the RCC bill and generally lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between fact and political propaganda. But I will give you credit for creativity - drawing such a direct line from the decriminalization of street vending (something I don’t think I’ve ever seen anywhere in Ward 3, but carry on) to “regular looting” requires a very special mind.

Well, President Biden, Leader Chuck Schumer, Mayor Bowser, and 32 other Senate Democrats knew what was in the Council crime bill that Frumin voted for. And they sure didn’t like it. Pro tip: if a California senator thinks your crime bill is crazy, you need to find a new line of work.

All of which would seem to confirm that you indeed have absolutely no idea what was in the actual bill. You favor cheap talking points over actual analysis. If you did know what was in the bill, you would understand that prosecutors jobs are more difficult - and DC is therefore less safe - for that bill not becoming law. Not that Bowser, Schumer, or Biden have ever shown much interest in doing anything to help improve the quality of life in DC.

Please list 5 of Frumin’s accomplishments on behalf of his ward 3 constituents. How has he made things better since Mary Cheh left? Can anyone highlight his accomplishments??

What were Mary Cheh’s five accomplishments?

What were Jack Evans’?

Liberal by any standard, Mary was able to serve as a circuit breaker for some of the Councils worst instincts on crime, vouchers, and sanctuary city issues. Frumin completely lacks the knowledge or courage to push back on the socialist tendencies of the current Council and Ward 3 is worse for it.

ironic statement given she gave up her office when she was criticized for comments she made about new voucher residents in her neighborhood - so she wasn't able to stop what you are calling the council's worst instincts and it cost her seat.

Yes. The other poster seems to believe Ward 3 constitutes some kind of jurisdiction and can take its ball and go home if it doesn’t like what the city is foisting upon it. Ward 3 is far wealthier and whiter than anywhere else in the city. The optics of Ward 3 NiMBYs screaming bloody murder about housing vouchers are horrendous. The evisceration of Mary Cheh after she raised a few valid complaints was a lesson that Matt Frumin has wisely heeded. Doing the kinds of things that the other poster apparently wanted would have worked out very badly for the residents of the ward.

If you want to literally hear people screaming bloody murder come hang out in the lobby of Connecticut House on the weekends.

It's not a great situation, by any means. But a Ward 3 council-member sounding off publicly about the shortcomings of the program would be counter-productive. As we know from Cheh.

Ward 3 residents should certainly be asking Frumin privately about what he is doing about the issue. But he's wise not to be litigating this on social media.

LOL! Could it get any worse?