Sorry but we already know what dems have done on this SB. Time to pivot to literally any alternative. Voting dem would be tacit approval of what they already have done. They haven’t shown any sign they are changing direction. It’s an easy choice really. |
No, that’s terrible advice. |
It turns out they were right - I don't think that makes them nutters. |
You cast any reasonable voice of dissent as a nutter. |
+1 |
+100 Just a few dissenting voices on that SB would help. Right now, it's a full-on LWNJ majority. Ridiculous. |
Who do you think is a reasonable voice of dissent? |
DP. Have you seen the thread in Website Feedback started by a whiny poster (probably the same one who has complained before), asserting that too many "conservatives" are posting in an attempt to influence the election? Clearly, she just wants Democrats to be able to express their opinions and influence the election. Unreal. Here's part of her post: "I have noticed an uptick in Virginia-related content that is obviously an attempt to influence the outcome of the off-year election. It’s one thing for its nonsense to be rabidly consumed by its dotard audience but there is no need to amplify it in mainstream forums." |
A reasonable dissent, sure. Nutters just cause chaos. Please refer to the house Rs. |
THIS ^^ |
![]() OMG. I truly hope this is satire... |
Me, LOL. But I hate people so I can't run for SB. That's the problem - no one good / normal can or wants to do these jobs either. So we only get these people on a power trip. |
I think you're missing the point. The *current* SB is entirely full of nutters - of one political stripe. I have no problem with diluting that nuttery. |
Yup. The crazy parents are a real turn-off for potential normal candidates. |
Explain |