Indictment Monday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cohen is cagey like a fox.

One thing that has been consistent thus far.....
Every single witness that has testified has no love for Cohen.
Hope Hicks said that he named himself "The Fixer" because he had to fix things HE broke.

That sounds like she is parroting Trump said after Cohen and Trump dissolved their relationship. Cohen was with the trump org. a long time so Trump found him valuable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cohen is cagey like a fox.

One thing that has been consistent thus far.....
Every single witness that has testified has no love for Cohen.
Hope Hicks said that he named himself "The Fixer" because he had to fix things HE broke.

If Trump is so smart with the best brain why would he hire someone like Cohen then?

Why would I want a president who made such poor choices in hiring his closest advisors?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Of course. Michael Cohen, who did not have the money, took out a home equity loan to pay $150K to Stormy Daniels to keep her from telling her story to the tabloids. He did it because he felt so strongly that Daniel's story should not be told befor the leection that he risked losing his home to stop her from telling her story. He felt much more strongly about this than the many running for President who purportedly had over $500M in the bank.

Man, have you drunk the Kool Aid.

Michael Cohen is not the sharpest tool in the shed. And, I suspect the jury will discover this during his testimony.

Trump is the one who hired him and kept him on for years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Of course. Michael Cohen, who did not have the money, took out a home equity loan to pay $150K to Stormy Daniels to keep her from telling her story to the tabloids. He did it because he felt so strongly that Daniel's story should not be told befor the leection that he risked losing his home to stop her from telling her story. He felt much more strongly about this than the many running for President who purportedly had over $500M in the bank.

Man, have you drunk the Kool Aid.

And they hope that we have as well. Unfortunately for us, Republicans are coming to a place where we have about as much choice as they did in Jonestown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Of course. Michael Cohen, who did not have the money, took out a home equity loan to pay $150K to Stormy Daniels to keep her from telling her story to the tabloids. He did it because he felt so strongly that Daniel's story should not be told befor the leection that he risked losing his home to stop her from telling her story. He felt much more strongly about this than the many running for President who purportedly had over $500M in the bank.

Man, have you drunk the Kool Aid.

Michael Cohen is not the sharpest tool in the shed. And, I suspect the jury will discover this during his testimony.

Neither is Trump but they both have some skills. Cohen keeps meticulous records.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Of course. Michael Cohen, who did not have the money, took out a home equity loan to pay $150K to Stormy Daniels to keep her from telling her story to the tabloids. He did it because he felt so strongly that Daniel's story should not be told befor the leection that he risked losing his home to stop her from telling her story. He felt much more strongly about this than the many running for President who purportedly had over $500M in the bank.

Man, have you drunk the Kool Aid.

Plus, if Trump’s defense is that Cohen alone committed a crime by paying Daniels, that is an admission that Trump’s reimbursement to Cohen was not payment for legal services but was business fraud and campaign finance fraud by Trump to cover up Cohen’s crime. If Cohen is guilty, Trump is guilty.

[Anonymous]

The most interesting thing about Hope Hicks' testimony on the stand is how the biased media portrays it.

The conservative Fox News says that Hope Hicks imploded the prosecution's case by saying that Trump had no political intent to hide his affair, but was only hiding it to save his wife.

The liberal CNN News says that Hicks' testimony was a nightmare for Trump as it only proved all the points that the prosecution wanted to prove, namely that Trump knew about the payments Cohen made to Daniels and that he knew about the attempts to falsify business records to hide it.

The case of the confirmation bias from both sides as they believe what they saw confirms their own preconceived opinions.

It will be interesting to see what the jury thinks, as right now, they are the only real opinion that matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most interesting thing about Hope Hicks' testimony on the stand is how the biased media portrays it.

The conservative Fox News says that Hope Hicks imploded the prosecution's case by saying that Trump had no political intent to hide his affair, but was only hiding it to save his wife.

The liberal CNN News says that Hicks' testimony was a nightmare for Trump as it only proved all the points that the prosecution wanted to prove, namely that Trump knew about the payments Cohen made to Daniels and that he knew about the attempts to falsify business records to hide it.

The case of the confirmation bias from both sides as they believe what they saw confirms their own preconceived opinions.

It will be interesting to see what the jury thinks, as right now, they are the only real opinion that matters.

Fox knows what they are saying is bullshit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

ARe you sitting at Mar a lago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Come on over to my house because where I'm sitting Trump's goose is cooked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most interesting thing about Hope Hicks' testimony on the stand is how the biased media portrays it.

The conservative Fox News says that Hope Hicks imploded the prosecution's case by saying that Trump had no political intent to hide his affair, but was only hiding it to save his wife.

The liberal CNN News says that Hicks' testimony was a nightmare for Trump as it only proved all the points that the prosecution wanted to prove, namely that Trump knew about the payments Cohen made to Daniels and that he knew about the attempts to falsify business records to hide it.

The case of the confirmation bias from both sides as they believe what they saw confirms their own preconceived opinions.

It will be interesting to see what the jury thinks, as right now, they are the only real opinion that matters.

Which is why I read the New York Times, who pointed out how Hicks' testimony could be mined by BOTH sides to uphold some of their arguments.

[Anonymous]

Hope and her crocodile tears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hope and her crocodile tears.

I'm sure they're real. In the moment, if you're not adequately prepared (and perhaps medicated for anxiety), tears can come quickly. I had this happen at a funeral while reading my portion. I didn't mean to cry, and had not been that close to the deceased, but suddenly out they came.

That being said, I don't think Hicks was up to her task at the White House. This is how you get assistants who panic and send "Deny deny deny" emails without even pausing to reflect. It's a lesson in hiring people who can keep a cool head in a crisis. Meadow's ex-assistant, Cassidy Hutchinson, is a lot more capable, despite being younger.

[Anonymous]

Trump's 'Nelson Mandela' moment is about to happen

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump's 'Nelson Mandela' moment is about to happen

Trump will push it to see what merchan does and to see if he can get more supporters to show up at the courthouse. No one is there and his ego is hurting.