Indictment Monday?

[Anonymous]

Why has trump never attacked David Pecker? In fact, he complimented Pecker saying he was nice. What does Pecker know that terrifies Trump?


https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-trial-david-pecker-national-enquirer-1894487

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why has trump never attacked David Pecker? In fact, he complimented Pecker saying he was nice. What does Pecker know that terrifies Trump?
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-trial-david-pecker-national-enquirer-1894487

Pecker has a vault full of Trump’s secrets. We knew this six years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why has trump never attacked David Pecker? In fact, he complimented Pecker saying he was nice. What does Pecker know that terrifies Trump?


https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-trial-david-pecker-national-enquirer-1894487

I’d still lik to know this. As a pp said we knew this several years ago (was it six?!) but I’ve been curious since.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why has trump never attacked David Pecker? In fact, he complimented Pecker saying he was nice. What does Pecker know that terrifies Trump?


https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-trial-david-pecker-national-enquirer-1894487

I’d still lik to know this. As a pp said we knew this several years ago (was it six?!) but I’ve been curious since.

Probably a lot of unsavory stuff. Trump was a jerk long before he decided to run for president. The fact that he’s being quiet about Pecker says it all.

[Anonymous]

Hope Hicks on the stand!

[Anonymous]

Nope. The DA that tried to prosecute Trump admitted he’s a criminal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hope Hicks on the stand!

I hadn’t realized she’d been around from the beginning.

[Anonymous]

This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

Michael Cohen paid off Stormy Daniels on his own behalf? And manipulated the Trump corp's business records?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

The crime is indisputable. Trump Org falsified business records to reimburse Cohen for making illegal campaign contributions that were approved by Trump and intended to aid his campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

The crime is indisputable. Trump Org falsified business records to reimburse Cohen for making illegal campaign contributions that were approved by Trump and intended to aid his campaign.

Not one part of what you claim has even begun to be proven so far. Nothing. Nada.
If they are relying on Michael Cohen to prove these claims, they are grasping at straws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the prosecutor's witness.

🔥Major development- undercutting the state’s case that Trump entered into an NDA with Stormy Daniel’s to save his presidential campaign:

Former Trump aide Hope Hicks testified that Trump: “was concerned about the [Stormy Daniel’s] story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure the newspapers weren’t delivered to their residence that morning.”

Yeah, so? Both can be true.

From where I sit, the prosecution is proving day by day that they have no case and there has been no crime committed.
And, IF there was a crime, Michael Cohen is the one who committed it.

The crime is indisputable. Trump Org falsified business records to reimburse Cohen for making illegal campaign contributions that were approved by Trump and intended to aid his campaign.

Not one part of what you claim has even begun to be proven so far. Nothing. Nada.
If they are relying on Michael Cohen to prove these claims, they are grasping at straws.

It only matters what the 12 jurors decide.