Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.
What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?
Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.
That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.
Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.
LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL
Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!
LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.
What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.
That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.
But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!
2013? Who is looking at 2013 now? A lot of changes happen at puberty when kick , push run does not cut it anymore. Don’t get too excited at the U little because soccer is not about the strongest kid and talked kid rules.
Kick, push, run? At McLean? Maybe YOUR club does (whichever lame Onion alliance team you belong to). Project much?
Push, kick, run is 100% Loudoun Soccer
Loudoun is in disarray. Their girls have all left.
No, they haven’t.

Some left. Some were cut. A whole lot stayed. Same thing will happen next year when kids sit on the bench, get limited playing time, mommies and daddies get upset, mommies and daddies get tired of traveling to/from their new club… then they will leave that club… and go after what they think is the next best thing, again… it’s a cycle. It doesn’t matter what league or club your kid is playing in. It matters how good your kid is, how much they love the sport, how well they fit on a team, are they coachable. It matters how they feel, and how they perform. What doesn’t matter is the club, the league, entitlement, or parent’s feelings. If you’re kid has what it takes and consistently performs well while doing something they enjoy there is no reason to keep chasing the cycle that is the ever changing environment of youth soccer. Sometimes, change is good for certain kids. Most of the time, it’s not a change to better the kid, but rather to make the parent happy and feel better about themselves. Parents are the problem with youth soccer in the US. Oblivion and entitlement. Simply browse through the thousands of pages on this forum for every club and you will see. The unhappy, entitled mommies and daddies who think their kid is going to be the next superstar pro soccer player, but plays 30 subpar minutes every game. Good luck to all the kids who earn their place on the field next season. Good luck to the parents who think they made the right decision for their child. Godspeed to the coaches for having to put up with youth soccer parents.
Signed,
A youth soccer parent (but, not one of those mentioned above)