Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

Because they were threatened and terrified.

Like republican members of congress who vote for bills they know are bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The official distraction. Thank you Tulsi for proving there is something dumber than a bag of rocks. MAGA!

[twitter] https://x.com/ronxyz00/status/1946555437534548081?s=46&t=M9CwsQ5624hf2TT3TtWHzw[/twitter]

X is unbearable this weekend. Full of morons who think Obama is days away from Gitmo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: the felon sues WSJ for $10 BILLION. Get your popcorn for discovery and more exposes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

Folks this is it: the MAGA civil war. Trump realizes the monied powers behind the GOP are trying to dump him for Vance. This is the formal breakup between Trump and RW media.

Holy sh#t. Get ready for Trump’s Night of the Long Knives.

Stop it with your break-up theory. The majority of MAGA is loyal to Trump.

Also, to another PP, of course the WSJ knew Trump was going to sue. It says so in the article. He was reached for comment, and he told them he would sue if they published. And on that point, history shows he's a man of his word. So obviously WSJ has the goods to back up their claim.

The question is, are Murdoch and the editor going to quash the intrepid reporters and settle with Trump? I hope not.

Who would have thought ABC and CBS would settle with him, but they did. I hope the WSJ has irrefutable proof that it was done by Trump. Although I have to agree with Don Jr. that it doesn't really sound like Trump and doodling is supposedly a sign of intelligence so...

I think that the WSJ has a lot more. The birthday love note was bait.

I think the WSJ snipe + the health report this week is a shot across Trump's bow. The oligarchs got their tax cut out of him and now they're ready to toss him overboard. I wouldn't be surprised if Trump is on it and just wants to retire and hand the keys to Vance.

^ All of this!

Trump may want to retire, but he doesn't want to be disgraced. Not his thing at all.

I hope he becomes disgraced as a pedophile, which he should be. The more we learn, the more disgusting he becomes. For example, someone from Epstein’s network from France sent Trump three 12 year old girls as a present (see previous posts)? So horrible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

Because they were threatened and terrified.

None of the epstein victims have fared particularly well, and there's no upside to it. Look at how stormy daniels got treated for saying she had consensual sex (albeit where Trump insisted on being spanked by a magazine with his face on it).

[Anonymous]

Why is Trump asking for grand jury testimony?

1. Because he knows it’s unlikely to be released and then he can blame the judge

2. Because that testimony is restricted to charges against Epstein and Maxwell and is unlikely to name clients

3. Because it generates delay and confusion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm, let's see where this goes. The WSJ had to have know that Trump was going to make this move. I can't imagine that their plan was to publish this piece and then pay an inevitable settlement. I don't think this is going the obvious direction that Trump thinks it's going.

He’s hoping they settle because they’re afraid of him taking FOX’s broadcast license.

But I assure you they didn’t run this without consulting their attorneys for days, and without having cast iron proof.

On a legal basis they cannot lose. But Murdoch might not have the appetite for the right, the way CBS didn’t.

I think nothing would make Murdoch happier than to vanquish Trump

I'll believe it when I see it. Murdoch is interested in money - even as a 140 year old. And Fox and MAGA are his bread and butter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some persuasive commentary on Trump’s ten billion dollar lawsuit. They’re actually trying to claim that reporting that Trump and Epstein were friends is defamatory? They were close for like 15 years. Guy really thinks he can bend reality.

Did all of Trump's lawyer graduate from Trump University law school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm, let's see where this goes. The WSJ had to have know that Trump was going to make this move. I can't imagine that their plan was to publish this piece and then pay an inevitable settlement. I don't think this is going the obvious direction that Trump thinks it's going.

He’s hoping they settle because they’re afraid of him taking FOX’s broadcast license.

But I assure you they didn’t run this without consulting their attorneys for days, and without having cast iron proof.

On a legal basis they cannot lose. But Murdoch might not have the appetite for the right, the way CBS didn’t.

I think nothing would make Murdoch happier than to vanquish Trump

I'll believe it when I see it. Murdoch is interested in money - even as a 140 year old. And Fox and MAGA are his bread and butter.

But he would be a world-wide hero if he demolishes Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm, let's see where this goes. The WSJ had to have know that Trump was going to make this move. I can't imagine that their plan was to publish this piece and then pay an inevitable settlement. I don't think this is going the obvious direction that Trump thinks it's going.

He’s hoping they settle because they’re afraid of him taking FOX’s broadcast license.

But I assure you they didn’t run this without consulting their attorneys for days, and without having cast iron proof.

On a legal basis they cannot lose. But Murdoch might not have the appetite for the right, the way CBS didn’t.

I think nothing would make Murdoch happier than to vanquish Trump

I'll believe it when I see it. Murdoch is interested in money - even as a 140 year old. And Fox and MAGA are his bread and butter.

But he would be a world-wide hero if he demolishes Trump.

That is actually true. Canadian here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some persuasive commentary on Trump’s ten billion dollar lawsuit. They’re actually trying to claim that reporting that Trump and Epstein were friends is defamatory? They were close for like 15 years. Guy really thinks he can bend reality.

Did all of Trump's lawyer graduate from Trump University law school?

It’s pro se

[Anonymous]

oh dear MAGA the cult of stupids and UnAmerican morons,

Not Drag Queens.....

Yes Republicans

[Anonymous]

A federal judge has barred Washington state from enforcing a law that would have required priests to report evidence of child abuse learned during confession.

The Trump administration had intervened on the side of the Catholic clergy.

Because MAGA/Republicans are the pedos not drag queens and Project 2025 will let them you fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

Because they were threatened and terrified.

None of the epstein victims have fared particularly well, and there's no upside to it. Look at how stormy daniels got treated for saying she had consensual sex (albeit where Trump insisted on being spanked by a magazine with his face on it).[/
There’s no real secret here. Trump hosted underage beauty pageants, married an Eastern European woman, flirted with Ivanka etc. it was kind of obvious what he was way back in the 80s. It’s shocking that anyone is shocked by this. Things like this were more acceptable prior to social media, is it right? No, but older men were into shady sh!t since the dawn of time. There’s nothing new or surprising here.

[Anonymous]

Help me understand trump’s lawyer’s complaint that wsj claimed it was “exclusive” but then published it widely.

It honestly seems like trumps misunderstanding that people seeking asylum have been released guy “insane asylums.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some persuasive commentary on Trump’s ten billion dollar lawsuit. They’re actually trying to claim that reporting that Trump and Epstein were friends is defamatory? They were close for like 15 years. Guy really thinks he can bend reality.

Did all of Trump's lawyer graduate from Trump University law school?

It’s pro se

Trump is going to represent himself?! Wow.I hope it's televised.