Muslim and Arab Killings in the US

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


My kids have been called Terrorists and Sand Nigger. My family came to the US in the early 1700's and one was a President, I married an Iranian. I teach my children not to lower themselves into the gutter rhetoric and hate of poorly educated people. I find your approach counter productive to resolving problems within a community that has fallen victim to hate speech.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.

Well, what did you expect us to say? You post about your fear about your child being bullied and that the prejudice might one day grow beyond the school yard. Are we supposed to assure you that, no....it won't? (And I didn't hear anyone tell you that you deserved it, or "bend over" and take it.) When we say that many of us were bullied but our parents recognized that's no reason to leave the greatest country on earth, you object. When a number of posters correctly pointed out that crimes against Muslims are a small percentage of hate crimes (pointing out how much more prevalent anti-Semitism is), our moderator is angry for our putting the situation in perspective. And finally, think about it. We are ENCOURAGING you to stay! Would that be something that prejudiced people do? So what's this with the "people like you" bit? Your anger is misplaced.
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.

Well, what did you expect us to say? You post about your fear about your child being bullied and that the prejudice might one day grow beyond the school yard. Are we supposed to assure you that, no....it won't? (And I didn't hear anyone tell you that you deserved it, or "bend over" and take it.) When we say that many of us were bullied but our parents recognized that's no reason to leave the greatest country on earth, you object. When a number of posters correctly pointed out that crimes against Muslims are a small percentage of hate crimes (pointing out how much more prevalent anti-Semitism is), our moderator is angry for our putting the situation in perspective. And finally, think about it. We are ENCOURAGING you to stay! Would that be something that prejudiced people do? So what's this with the "people like you" bit? Your anger is misplaced.


The perspective that you refuse to acknowledge -- and your refusal does indeed make me angry -- is that the statistics you cite are two years old and show declining anti-Semitism and rising anti-Muslim incidents. Moreover, whereas a anti-Semitism is almost universally condemned in America, anti-Muslim prejudice is widely accepted and actively promoted by the Republican nominee for the presidency.

What I would want you to say to the above poster is, "I am sorry that you feel that America is becoming a threat to you and your children. As a member of a community that has frequently faced similar prejudice, I can empathize with you and understand your fears. I find it intolerable that Trump has formatted prejudice against many groups, including Muslims and Arabs."

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


The issue I have, Ms or Mr Globalist, is your comment 'We go where the jobs are'. You have no loyalty to the US so terror here is of no never mind. The attack on Sept 11 means nothing to you except 'how sad'. To Americans like myself, this was the first major attack on our homeland since Pearl Harbor, and you know what that brought. This is my issue too with Mr Khan - his son was the patriot and I am deeply indebted to him. I will continue to honor him with my pride in him, my pride in this nation, and my pride in those here who seek to make it stronger. Mr Khan, however, has proved himself to be nothing but a political shill for his religion, which Hillary then uses politically.

This nation is more than just 'a job' to me. I would rather have our own poor become educated citizens and someday be able to do your job, than have you come here with no loyalties to our nation, educate your kids here, and further insult OUR citizens.

My son was bullied because he was chubby. Kids can be mean. We dealt. We listened. We moved him to a private school that had a no bullying policy and enforced it. He thrived there. That's what Americans do. We are resilient. We are proud of who we are. Progressivism is a poison, because the goal is to break us down. Won't happen.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


The issue I have, Ms or Mr Globalist, is your comment 'We go where the jobs are'. You have no loyalty to the US so terror here is of no never mind. The attack on Sept 11 means nothing to you except 'how sad'. To Americans like myself, this was the first major attack on our homeland since Pearl Harbor, and you know what that brought. This is my issue too with Mr Khan - his son was the patriot and I am deeply indebted to him. I will continue to honor him with my pride in him, my pride in this nation, and my pride in those here who seek to make it stronger. Mr Khan, however, has proved himself to be nothing but a political shill for his religion, which Hillary then uses politically.

This nation is more than just 'a job' to me. I would rather have our own poor become educated citizens and someday be able to do your job, than have you come here with no loyalties to our nation, educate your kids here, and further insult OUR citizens.

My son was bullied because he was chubby. Kids can be mean. We dealt. We listened. We moved him to a private school that had a no bullying policy and enforced it. He thrived there. That's what Americans do. We are resilient. We are proud of who we are. Progressivism is a poison, because the goal is to break us down. Won't happen.

Not a word of what you said made sense. You are projecting your emotions onto a scenario wholly unrelated to them. Breaking you down? Who exactly is insulting YOUR citizens?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?




Wait...what was this thread about again?
How did we get here?
Am I high?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?


Except he globalist said guys named Mohammed would not hold security jobs. So much for that. I expect Ehud and LaShonda to do their security jobs well too
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


The issue I have, Ms or Mr Globalist, is your comment 'We go where the jobs are'. You have no loyalty to the US so terror here is of no never mind. The attack on Sept 11 means nothing to you except 'how sad'. To Americans like myself, this was the first major attack on our homeland since Pearl Harbor, and you know what that brought. This is my issue too with Mr Khan - his son was the patriot and I am deeply indebted to him. I will continue to honor him with my pride in him, my pride in this nation, and my pride in those here who seek to make it stronger. Mr Khan, however, has proved himself to be nothing but a political shill for his religion, which Hillary then uses politically.

This nation is more than just 'a job' to me. I would rather have our own poor become educated citizens and someday be able to do your job, than have you come here with no loyalties to our nation, educate your kids here, and further insult OUR citizens.

My son was bullied because he was chubby. Kids can be mean. We dealt. We listened. We moved him to a private school that had a no bullying policy and enforced it. He thrived there. That's what Americans do. We are resilient. We are proud of who we are. Progressivism is a poison, because the goal is to break us down. Won't happen.

Not a word of what you said made sense. You are projecting your emotions onto a scenario wholly unrelated to them. Breaking you down? Who exactly is insulting YOUR citizens?


Miss globalist said 'we go where the jobs are, no loyalty'. Mr Khan insulted our citizens by saying he asked his son if he should be fighting Muslims. That's what no loyalty to a country looks like - no respect for sovereign borders. Thank God his son did not take after him in this regard
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?


Except he globalist said guys named Mohammed would not hold security jobs. So much for that. I expect Ehud and LaShonda to do their security jobs well too


Security CLEARANCE jobs, dumbass. Not security jobs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?


Except he globalist said guys named Mohammed would not hold security jobs. So much for that. I expect Ehud and LaShonda to do their security jobs well too


Security CLEARANCE jobs, dumbass. Not security jobs.


The job of who we let through security in airports is critical. If we give that to Mohammed, that says something
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?


Except he globalist said guys named Mohammed would not hold security jobs. So much for that. I expect Ehud and LaShonda to do their security jobs well too


Security CLEARANCE jobs, dumbass. Not security jobs.


The job of who we let through security in airports is critical. If we give that to Mohammed, that says something


It says that the perceived slights against Muslims are unfounded?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I encourage you to leave now and pay for citizenships as you move around the globe. But that will not stop your child from being bullied where his surname is as common as mud or where he will be the only one with that type of surname. To think you will make life decisions based on your child possibly being bullied may mean that your are not as smart as the global job market requires.



We'll leave when we're good and ready, you won't have a vote on that committee, nor will you ever have any idea how smart or dumb we are.

I'm going to practice my patience instead of sarcasm now and explain this to you like you were five:

It's not just about the possibility of bullying; clearly, no one leaves over that. First, it's bullying at school, then, it's harassment at airports, then, it's being passed over for jobs and security clearances. And on top of that, there's indifference of the general public - people like you - who says, oh well, you people had it coming, bend over and take it, small price to pay to live in such an awesome country, and my grandpa used to be called bad names too, you'll survive. And maybe your son NEEDS to be scrutinized more than my son because hey, he comes from a population that I think is responsible for the world's ills.

So, for now, I'm sticking with teaching my child to say "asshole" a lot earlier than I thought I'd have to.


A guy named Mohammed barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday. I hardly think we are the problem. Mohammed's apathy for his job however?

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a permissive environment for anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiment looks like.

Imagine the reaction if the sentence read "a guy named Ehud barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday", or "a girl called LaShonda barely checked my id on the way through security on Sunday." A bit different, no?


Except he globalist said guys named Mohammed would not hold security jobs. So much for that. I expect Ehud and LaShonda to do their security jobs well too


Security CLEARANCE jobs, dumbass. Not security jobs.


The job of who we let through security in airports is critical. If we give that to Mohammed, that says something


It says that the perceived slights against Muslims are unfounded?


It says a man named Muhammed can get hired for jobs that involve putting people on planes after a major terrorist attack
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:It says a man named Muhammed can get hired for jobs that involve putting people on planes after a major terrorist attack


What do you think the chances are of Muhammed keeping his job during a Trump administration? Presumably Muhammed passed the same background check required for everyone else who has the same job. Trump would likely expect a more stringent (and expensive) background check which would create an incentive for whomever pays for such checks to avoid hiring "Muhammeds" in the future.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: