IDF used cigarettes to torture 18-month baby

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion

◄ 1 2 3 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ► Go

Go to page...

03/28/2026 01:35

Subject: IDF used cigarettes to torture 18-month baby

quote

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So upsetting to see people defend this. Video evidence of the torture this poor poor child suffered is all over the internet and yet you have comments like above. He’s a baby, think of your own children, having a cigarette stubbed on their tiny legs.

Show us the non-AI, non-sketchy source, video “evidence.” We’ll wait.

We would, but the actual footage is with the 40 headless babies you loved to mention w/o "evidence."

You have no credibility. None.

It’s funny because the only people who continue to mention the “40 headless babies” are the Iranian and Palestinian propagandists here. Over and over. No one else has been talking about that.

On THIS thread, we’re talking about the allegations that a 3 yr old boy was harmed by IDF. So far, all we have are propaganda sites and unsourced claims. You’ve been asked repeatedly to share a legitimate source that states unequivocally that this happened. You’ve haven’t done so because one does not exist.

DP

I mean, why would YOU still be mentioning it? The fact that you tried to sell it so hard for months is the source of endless mockery.

Not only were your claims entirely untrue, but they actually described historical events that DID occur nearly 80 years ago. Except, back then, it was Zionist Jews who were cutting off the heads of Palestinian babies, ripping fetuses from the wombs of pregnant Palestinian women, and forcing Palestinian fathers to watch helplessly as those fetuses were put in ovens.

So OF COURSE you’re not mentioning it any longer. You’re just getting dunked on with mockery for having ever been idiotic enough to push your false claims. Now take the L and STFU.

Lady, YOU need to take a seat (and your meds). You have no sources to substantiate your disgusting claims of 80 yrs. ago (??), so just stop the propaganda. You are completely repulsive.

No sources? Let’s start with Deir Yassin and Tantura.

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-211346/

https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/jps/tantura.html

Repulsive? You’re the Zionist. What could be more repulsive than that?

Anyone defending Hamas, for starters.

Where has anyone defended Hamas?

Be very, very detailed.

Oh, well that's an easy ask.

"Look, Oct 7th is easy to excuse away if we just refer to it as Hamas "mowing the lawn."

"Hamas “is the very epitome of evil” is hilarious hasbara."

"Do ppl not understand that Hamas always honored ceasefires and Israel never has?"

"You'll never accept this fact: The Hamas Health ministry was more trustworthy than Israel EVER was."

First and foremost, none of those statement were made by me.

I didn’t even go back through the thread to verify that all of them are here, but I’ll take you at your word.

What I expected was for you to identify where you had found a poster specifically defending the actions of Hamas on 10/7/2023. The only statement you provided that got there was the first one.

However, as I understand it, the “mowing the lawn” reference is to the internal Israeli characterization of how they contain Palestinian population growth through periodic slaughters.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/05/14/israel-gaza-history/

In that light, I mean … not sure I find that to be “defending Hamas” as I find it to be pointing out hypocrisy.

All you said was, "Where has anyone defended Hamas?" I responded by quoting several posters. And all of those statements were made in the context of Oct. 7. I have completed the assignment, regardless of what you "expected."

I don’t want to argue back and forth about this, but I think it’s important to point out that I see a lot of slippery slope shenanigans in these kinds of threads were criticism of Israel is quickly mischaracterized as “defending Hamas”, which then gets mischaracterized as “pro-Hamas”, and which eventually gets mischaracterized as “terrorist supporter providing material support to terrorists”.

In my experience, that happens far too often to NOT be part of an organized propaganda guide.

Okay… and I’m sure you see the “slippery slope shenanigans” where criticism of Iran and Islamic terrorists is quickly mischaracterized as “Zionist supporter” and trigger post after post of unhinged insults and propaganda. Especially on these threads where the incidents of that happening FAR outweigh what you describe.