No threads about Rama Duwaji aesthetic and fashion?

[Anonymous]

Those pictures show someone who is boring and predictable. It's exactly what you would think an "artsy" "city" woman would wear. Nothing unique about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t like her style at all but watching the MAGAs melt down over people who do is funny

I'm not MAGA and think she looks terrible. And the comparisons to Audrey Hepburn are comical. There is no planet on which she resembles Audrey Hepburn.

She is very beautiful. If she choses to dress like it is 1950, she will probably fit your beauty standard.

Who said anything about 1950? How weird.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Very curious. I wonder why. I have my suspicions.

Why didn’t you just start one?

-Muslim woman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those pictures show someone who is boring and predictable. It's exactly what you would think an "artsy" "city" woman would wear. Nothing unique about her.

+1
It looks like she's cosplaying what she thinks someone "artsy" and "urban" would wear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a sheath dress in sight!
I loved her choice of clothing and the messages it sent. Vogue and other magazines did stories on it.
Excited to finally have a political figure who can dress beautifully.

What was the message of this outfit - and pose?

She likes her boots! 👢

Seriously, she’s probably in her early 20s in this photo.

It was taken May 7, 2025.

Ooooh, so late 20's.

It was taken this year. But nice effort trying to make it seem like it was taken when she was just a young free spirited girl!

But… she IS in her late 20s. Like right now. She is 28. That is pretty young.

I'd be pretty embarrassed if I had a 28 year old daughter making that pose.

Well, maybe that is why your daughter would not even send you a photo of her dressed in thrift store clothing.

What a bizarre retort. My 20-something daughter and I love thrifting together. The particular dresses being discussed in this thread are just plain ugly, regardless of where they came from. But do keep up your childish posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a natural beauty. And she’s cool AF! Can’t really say that about any of the MAGA wives.

Exactly, she is young and don't need all the fillers to make her look like a pig.

Did someone suggest fillers? Nope. It's funny that any criticism of her brings out the "whattabout MAGA wives?!" contingent. They look awful too. And are totally off-topic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like that she looks totally different than most people would've assumed.

She looks exactly the way I knew she would. Especially in her selfies, trying to look “artistic” and edgy. Please, girl.

Let young people have fun. She is not going to a White House event.

No one is preventing her from doing anything. We are critiquing her fashion choices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t like her style at all but watching the MAGAs melt down over people who do is funny

I'm not MAGA and think she looks terrible. And the comparisons to Audrey Hepburn are comical. There is no planet on which she resembles Audrey Hepburn.

She is very beautiful. If she choses to dress like it is 1950, she will probably fit your beauty standard.

I don't think she's beautiful at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those pictures show someone who is boring and predictable. It's exactly what you would think an "artsy" "city" woman would wear. Nothing unique about her.

+1
It looks like she's cosplaying what she thinks someone "artsy" and "urban" would wear.

But that is simply wrong. I live in NYC and you Tuckernuck middle-aged morons quite literally don’t understand what you’re looking at, and tilt towards the most hashtag basic aesthetic choices imaginable. I say that as a middle-aged woman, but I’m not stupid, insecure, tasteless, or envious of younger women. That’s your issue. Well, those are some of your many and fascinating issues.

She isn’t you. She has taste and is creative. You’ll have to deal, because she and he are going to be a real draw for press for 4 years at least.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a natural beauty. And she’s cool AF! Can’t really say that about any of the MAGA wives.

Exactly, she is young and don't need all the fillers to make her look like a pig.

Did someone suggest fillers? Nope. It's funny that any criticism of her brings out the "whattabout MAGA wives?!" contingent. They look awful too. And are totally off-topic.

I’m sure you think because you’re not as extreme as Is That Jeannine Pirro? or the woman who looked like she was in the Black Hole Sun video at the Great Gatsby party, that your little spendy “tweaks” at your top-flight, subtle, East Coast coded, Weill Cornell trained, cosmetic derm are so subtle that you’re ageless. You’re wrong.

Women as different as Deeda Blair and Samira Nasr are not sh!tting on Rama Duwaji. No one looks to a sagging DMV itchy white snob with a closet stuffed with Saks on sale for taste or inspiration. Come on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t like her style at all but watching the MAGAs melt down over people who do is funny

I'm not MAGA and think she looks terrible. And the comparisons to Audrey Hepburn are comical. There is no planet on which she resembles Audrey Hepburn.

She is very beautiful. If she choses to dress like it is 1950, she will probably fit your beauty standard.

I don't think she's beautiful at all.

Beauty is subjective and she isn't running for Mrs. America crown so it doesn't matter but she is beautiful by most standards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two of the ugliest dresses in recent memory. Wow.

I can’t see what’s offensive about the top dress. It’s black, it’s a nice fabric, it fits her perfectly, she’s styled it nicely.

The bottom dress is not everyone’s cup of tea, but it looks like a casual white dress to me.

The top dress, aside from looking like a witch’s costume, is too small and tight across the top. The belt she paired with it is totally wrong and out of place.

The messy doily dress she has on over what looks like a 50s swimsuit is just awful and looks like, as another poster said, it was even rejected from the thrift store. And the black boots with it? A ridiculous look that just looks incredibly try-hard.

Babe, no, the dress fits perfectly. The belt is meh but fine. It's definitely a matter of taste whether you actually like this look (and it's not really something I would wear), but it's not "hideous."

Babe, sorry. The dress is ill-fitting and poorly conceived. And hideous, in addition to the jumble of rags white dress.

She seems happy with her choices and her life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t like her style at all but watching the MAGAs melt down over people who do is funny

I'm not MAGA and think she looks terrible. And the comparisons to Audrey Hepburn are comical. There is no planet on which she resembles Audrey Hepburn.

She is very beautiful. If she choses to dress like it is 1950, she will probably fit your beauty standard.

I don't think she's beautiful at all.

Beauty is subjective and she isn't running for Mrs. America crown so it doesn't matter but she is beautiful by most standards.

Not really. As you say, beauty is subjective. She's actually quite plain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those pictures show someone who is boring and predictable. It's exactly what you would think an "artsy" "city" woman would wear. Nothing unique about her.

+1
It looks like she's cosplaying what she thinks someone "artsy" and "urban" would wear.

But that is simply wrong. I live in NYC and you Tuckernuck middle-aged morons quite literally don’t understand what you’re looking at, and tilt towards the most hashtag basic aesthetic choices imaginable. I say that as a middle-aged woman, but I’m not stupid, insecure, tasteless, or envious of younger women. That’s your issue. Well, those are some of your many and fascinating issues.

She isn’t you. She has taste and is creative. You’ll have to deal, because she and he are going to be a real draw for press for 4 years at least.

I don't know what Tuckernuck it, but I know Rama looks exactly like every other art school kid who thinks they are "edgy" and "urban". It's a character.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t like her style at all but watching the MAGAs melt down over people who do is funny

I'm not MAGA and think she looks terrible. And the comparisons to Audrey Hepburn are comical. There is no planet on which she resembles Audrey Hepburn.

She is very beautiful. If she choses to dress like it is 1950, she will probably fit your beauty standard.

I don't think she's beautiful at all.

Beauty is subjective and she isn't running for Mrs. America crown so it doesn't matter but she is beautiful by most standards.

Not really. As you say, beauty is subjective. She's actually quite plain.

Incredibly plain down to her poorly fitting clothes.