King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles doesn't have the legal authority to do this. It would take an act of parliament. I don't know what they're talking about.

I’m pretty sure Charles knows more than you and has done whatever was needed re: Parliament. The statement came from the King and Queen.

Oh really? Parliament voted on this and didn't tell anyone? Wow. Thank you for clearing that up.

lol. Sweetie, you are a strange bird. This message came from the King himself. Take it up with him. Creepy Andrew fangirl.
In all seriousness, you are incorrect. Please look it up before mouthing off about something you don't know anything about.

You don't seem to know how to type but anyway. I'm not an Andrew Stan, I hate him. I also hate Charles which is why I'm bringing this up. My dad is British, the Windsors are making a mockery of the rule of law. Charles is using powers HE DOESN'T HAVE.

Apparently, he worked with other people who do have the authority because it is a DONE DEAL!

Exactly, Charles worked with Parliament to take Andrew off the peerage roll. Which is much less than Andrew deserves, but it’s well within Parliament’s powers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles doesn't have the legal authority to do this. It would take an act of parliament. I don't know what they're talking about.

I’m pretty sure Charles knows more than you and has done whatever was needed re: Parliament. The statement came from the King and Queen.

Oh really? Parliament voted on this and didn't tell anyone? Wow. Thank you for clearing that up.

lol. Sweetie, you are a strange bird. This message came from the King himself. Take it up with him. Creepy Andrew fangirl.
In all seriousness, you are incorrect. Please look it up before mouthing off about something you don't know anything about.

You don't seem to know how to type but anyway. I'm not an Andrew Stan, I hate him. I also hate Charles which is why I'm bringing this up. My dad is British, the Windsors are making a mockery of the rule of law. Charles is using powers HE DOESN'T HAVE.

Apparently, he worked with other people who do have the authority because it is a DONE DEAL!

Exactly, Charles worked with Parliament to take Andrew off the peerage roll. Which is much less than Andrew deserves, but it’s well within Parliament’s powers.

Charles is nor much better cheating on his wife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles doesn't have the legal authority to do this. It would take an act of parliament. I don't know what they're talking about.

I’m pretty sure Charles knows more than you and has done whatever was needed re: Parliament. The statement came from the King and Queen.

Oh really? Parliament voted on this and didn't tell anyone? Wow. Thank you for clearing that up.

lol. Sweetie, you are a strange bird. This message came from the King himself. Take it up with him. Creepy Andrew fangirl.
In all seriousness, you are incorrect. Please look it up before mouthing off about something you don't know anything about.

You don't seem to know how to type but anyway. I'm not an Andrew Stan, I hate him. I also hate Charles which is why I'm bringing this up. My dad is British, the Windsors are making a mockery of the rule of law. Charles is using powers HE DOESN'T HAVE.

Apparently, he worked with other people who do have the authority because it is a DONE DEAL!

Exactly, Charles worked with Parliament to take Andrew off the peerage roll. Which is much less than Andrew deserves, but it’s well within Parliament’s powers.

Charles is nor much better cheating on his wife.

Oh I agree Charles is an adulterer who set the tabloids against Diana, although I would never put adultery on the same level as pedophilia or trafficking girls. My point was simply that it’s bizarre to criticize Charles for taking even the minimal step of working with Parliament to remove Andrew from the peerage rolls.

[Anonymous]

Let’s focus. A few in Congress are calling for Andrew to testify about what he knows about Epstein’s organization. That might be tough because Andrew’s not in the US, but still. https://www.politico.eu/article/ex-prince-andrew-faces-increased-calls-by-us-lawmakers-to-testify-in-epstein-case/

[Anonymous]

New today: Andrew fixed palace visit for firm with £1.4m deal with ex-wife

In 2019, a crypto startup got a private tour of Buckingham Palace (and met the queen according to one participant), after hiring Fergie to a £1.4m “brand ambassador” deal.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy5q05v0q1xo

[Anonymous]

The Met Police are looking into reopening an investigation into Andrew. A decade ago Andrew asked the Met to dig up dirt to use against Virginia (shocking the royals do this), but the investigation could be wider too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles doesn't have the legal authority to do this. It would take an act of parliament. I don't know what they're talking about.

I’m pretty sure Charles knows more than you and has done whatever was needed re: Parliament. The statement came from the King and Queen.

Oh really? Parliament voted on this and didn't tell anyone? Wow. Thank you for clearing that up.

lol. Sweetie, you are a strange bird. This message came from the King himself. Take it up with him. Creepy Andrew fangirl.
In all seriousness, you are incorrect. Please look it up before mouthing off about something you don't know anything about.

You don't seem to know how to type but anyway. I'm not an Andrew Stan, I hate him. I also hate Charles which is why I'm bringing this up. My dad is British, the Windsors are making a mockery of the rule of law. Charles is using powers HE DOESN'T HAVE.

Apparently, he worked with other people who do have the authority because it is a DONE DEAL!

Exactly, Charles worked with Parliament to take Andrew off the peerage roll. Which is much less than Andrew deserves, but it’s well within Parliament’s powers.

Charles is nor much better cheating on his wife.

Surely you understand that cheating with a consenting adult doesn't come close to raping children, right?

There is no universe in which that isn't "not much better". That's like saying stubbing your toes isn't much better than having your leg amputated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles doesn't have the legal authority to do this. It would take an act of parliament. I don't know what they're talking about.

I’m pretty sure Charles knows more than you and has done whatever was needed re: Parliament. The statement came from the King and Queen.

Oh really? Parliament voted on this and didn't tell anyone? Wow. Thank you for clearing that up.

lol. Sweetie, you are a strange bird. This message came from the King himself. Take it up with him. Creepy Andrew fangirl.
In all seriousness, you are incorrect. Please look it up before mouthing off about something you don't know anything about.

You don't seem to know how to type but anyway. I'm not an Andrew Stan, I hate him. I also hate Charles which is why I'm bringing this up. My dad is British, the Windsors are making a mockery of the rule of law. Charles is using powers HE DOESN'T HAVE.

Apparently, he worked with other people who do have the authority because it is a DONE DEAL!

Exactly, Charles worked with Parliament to take Andrew off the peerage roll. Which is much less than Andrew deserves, but it’s well within Parliament’s powers.

Charles is nor much better cheating on his wife.

Surely you understand that cheating with a consenting adult doesn't come close to raping children, right?

There is no universe in which that isn't "not much better". That's like saying stubbing your toes isn't much better than having your leg amputated.

Make that 2 consenting liars and cheaters in any adulterous relationship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let’s focus. A few in Congress are calling for Andrew to testify about what he knows about Epstein’s organization. That might be tough because Andrew’s not in the US, but still. https://www.politico.eu/article/ex-prince-andrew-faces-increased-calls-by-us-lawmakers-to-testify-in-epstein-case/

Fantastic!!

[Anonymous]

donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

[Anonymous]

Something big is going to drop.
This move by the royal family is unprecedented and extreme. They must know there is video of something

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

So why hasn’t he? Why deal with the messy extradition process when there are so many Americans who can answer the same questions?

I wish the Trump administration or lawyers would try to extradite him. But they haven’t, wonder why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Something big is going to drop.
This move by the royal family is unprecedented and extreme. They must know there is video of something

Apparently more Andrew-Epstein-Fergie emails are going to drop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:donnie's in trouble.

Andrew will spill his guts.

It’s probably why Charles and William agreed to such a cushy deal. They don’t want Andrew spilling the dirt he knows about the remaining royals. Fergie’s already written multiple books, so…. The royals are probably hoping that kicking Andrew out of Windsor will be enough to avoid Spare II from Andrew or a broader Met or Parliamentary investigation.