
12:05 here. The articles you posted were informative and consistent with what I've been taught. I think they are a great launching point for further discussions on why 'modesty' for men looks different than 'modesty' for women. As clearly noted in the 2nd link, women are expected cover more of their bodies than men. Men are only expected to cover from the navel to the knee while women are to cover everything except hands and face. This expectation isn't unique to Islam. It's a cultural thing but because culture can't be removed from religion, that distinction is often lost. It's a pervasive belief in the US as well - look at the reactions to women wearing sleeveless garments in political settings. In 2017, women from both political parties protested a rule barring congresswomen from showing their arms on the House floor and the adjoining Speaker’s Lobby. Look at last year's dress code from the Missouri state house. Don't get me started on high school dress codes for girls. All this to say while it's great that OP feels more empowered, wearing hijab does not remove her from the system of commodification of women. It doesn't hold men accountable for their biases and it doesn't make the statement OP thinks it does. |
Sorry, I drafted this and posted it in response to another poster. It belongs here. Why does every post defending hijab have to slag off Christianity? Especially when the claims are so uninformed, although maybe that’s what you’re being taught. Being a nun or a monk is NOT the only way to lead a full Christian life, what a silly thing to say. Anyway, veiling was NOT all that common on Mohammed’s day. It was common among wealthy women like Mohammed’s wives. Poor women, who worked on the fields etc, couldn’t manage a veil. |