Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

But no one else blabs about it? A friend of a friend?

You think these girls talk about this?! Geez.

The girls recruited each other. So of course they talked about it.

The girls were also complicit if they were indeed recruiting other girls. They should have been reporting these people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

But no one else blabs about it? A friend of a friend?

This is irrelevant.

Totally and completely irrelevant.

Release all of the evidence, including the records from treasury, and we will know everything for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

But no one else blabs about it? A friend of a friend?

You think these girls talk about this?! Geez.

The girls recruited each other. So of course they talked about it.

The girls were also complicit if they were indeed recruiting other girls. They should have been reporting these people.

Get help.

For the sake of your family I hope that you don’t have kids.

You are blaming children for be raped.

Sick, sick. Sick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: the felon sues WSJ for $10 BILLION. Get your popcorn for discovery and more exposes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

Folks this is it: the MAGA civil war. Trump realizes the monied powers behind the GOP are trying to dump him for Vance. This is the formal breakup between Trump and RW media.

Holy sh#t. Get ready for Trump’s Night of the Long Knives.

Stop it with your break-up theory. The majority of MAGA is loyal to Trump.

Also, to another PP, of course the WSJ knew Trump was going to sue. It says so in the article. He was reached for comment, and he told them he would sue if they published. And on that point, history shows he's a man of his word. So obviously WSJ has the goods to back up their claim.

The question is, are Murdoch and the editor going to quash the intrepid reporters and settle with Trump? I hope not.

Who would have thought ABC and CBS would settle with him, but they did. I hope the WSJ has irrefutable proof that it was done by Trump. Although I have to agree with Don Jr. that it doesn't really sound like Trump and doodling is supposedly a sign of intelligence so...

I think that the WSJ has a lot more. The birthday love note was bait.

I think the WSJ snipe + the health report this week is a shot across Trump's bow. The oligarchs got their tax cut out of him and now they're ready to toss him overboard. I wouldn't be surprised if Trump is on it and just wants to retire and hand the keys to Vance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: the felon sues WSJ for $10 BILLION. Get your popcorn for discovery and more exposes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

Folks this is it: the MAGA civil war. Trump realizes the monied powers behind the GOP are trying to dump him for Vance. This is the formal breakup between Trump and RW media.

Holy sh#t. Get ready for Trump’s Night of the Long Knives.

Stop it with your break-up theory. The majority of MAGA is loyal to Trump.

Also, to another PP, of course the WSJ knew Trump was going to sue. It says so in the article. He was reached for comment, and he told them he would sue if they published. And on that point, history shows he's a man of his word. So obviously WSJ has the goods to back up their claim.

The question is, are Murdoch and the editor going to quash the intrepid reporters and settle with Trump? I hope not.

Who would have thought ABC and CBS would settle with him, but they did. I hope the WSJ has irrefutable proof that it was done by Trump. Although I have to agree with Don Jr. that it doesn't really sound like Trump and doodling is supposedly a sign of intelligence so...

I think that the WSJ has a lot more. The birthday love note was bait.

I think the WSJ snipe + the health report this week is a shot across Trump's bow. The oligarchs got their tax cut out of him and now they're ready to toss him overboard. I wouldn't be surprised if Trump is on it and just wants to retire and hand the keys to Vance.

Trump does not think that far in advance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

From the NYT article

"The single largest suspicious activity report reviewed by the congressional team was filed in late 2019 by JPMorgan for $1.1 billion. The report covered 4,700 transactions dating to 2003, including payments to women from Belarus, Russia and Turkmenistan. Many of Mr. Epstein’s victims included young women from Eastern European countries."

1.1B? 4,700 transactions?

And the public is supposed to accept that the only real offenders were Epstein and Maxwell?

The real question is why were these reported as "suspicious" only after Jeffrey Epstein was indicted.

Did JPMorgan think Epstein was importing auto parts and then selling them direct to other billionaires?

Indicted for the second time!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

The woman who filed a lawsuit against Trump and Epstein alleging they both raped her when she was 13 backed off due to death threats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

The woman who filed a lawsuit against Trump and Epstein alleging they both raped her when she was 13 backed off due to death threats.

Death threats by whom? Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

But no one else blabs about it? A friend of a friend?

You think these girls talk about this?! Geez.

The girls recruited each other. So of course they talked about it.

The girls were also complicit if they were indeed recruiting other girls. They should have been reporting these people.

Many of the girls did report him to the authorities and the FBI did nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

Here’s what happened to Vanity Fair editor Graydon Carter after reporter Vicky award turned in what was supposed to be a puff piece on Epstein that included allegations of sexual assaulting sisters Maria and Annie Farmer:

The profile ran without mention of the allegations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

But no one else blabs about it? A friend of a friend?

This is irrelevant.

Totally and completely irrelevant.

Release all of the evidence, including the records from treasury, and we will know everything for sure.

Maybe this what Musk knows since he had access to all of those records.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: the felon sues WSJ for $10 BILLION. Get your popcorn for discovery and more exposes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

Folks this is it: the MAGA civil war. Trump realizes the monied powers behind the GOP are trying to dump him for Vance. This is the formal breakup between Trump and RW media.

Holy sh#t. Get ready for Trump’s Night of the Long Knives.

Stop it with your break-up theory. The majority of MAGA is loyal to Trump.

Also, to another PP, of course the WSJ knew Trump was going to sue. It says so in the article. He was reached for comment, and he told them he would sue if they published. And on that point, history shows he's a man of his word. So obviously WSJ has the goods to back up their claim.

The question is, are Murdoch and the editor going to quash the intrepid reporters and settle with Trump? I hope not.

Who would have thought ABC and CBS would settle with him, but they did. I hope the WSJ has irrefutable proof that it was done by Trump. Although I have to agree with Don Jr. that it doesn't really sound like Trump and doodling is supposedly a sign of intelligence so...

I think that the WSJ has a lot more. The birthday love note was bait.

Agree. I think Murdoch is ready to take down Trump because of the longterm damage Trump is doing to the economy. Remember, Fox News was not on board with Trump's presidential candidacy until his nomination in 2016 became inevitable. They've supported him since only because their viewers demand it. (As evidence showed in the voting machine lawsuit, they were bleeding viewers to Newmax and OAN until they started backing up Trump's rigged voting machine claims.)

It's perfect to have WSJ expose Trump. Their readers are not the MAGA cult members drawn in by conspiracy theories-- they are mainstream Republicans who can primarily about the economy and their own wealth. It's a good strategy-- Report on Epstein to weaken Trump's hold on that part of his base, but do it from an organ of Newscorps that is an arm's length from Fox News.

The billionaires got their tax cut. The rest of Trump's agenda just hurts their bottom line.

[Anonymous]

what a MAGA mess

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: the felon sues WSJ for $10 BILLION. Get your popcorn for discovery and more exposes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

Folks this is it: the MAGA civil war. Trump realizes the monied powers behind the GOP are trying to dump him for Vance. This is the formal breakup between Trump and RW media.

Holy sh#t. Get ready for Trump’s Night of the Long Knives.

Stop it with your break-up theory. The majority of MAGA is loyal to Trump.

Also, to another PP, of course the WSJ knew Trump was going to sue. It says so in the article. He was reached for comment, and he told them he would sue if they published. And on that point, history shows he's a man of his word. So obviously WSJ has the goods to back up their claim.

The question is, are Murdoch and the editor going to quash the intrepid reporters and settle with Trump? I hope not.

Who would have thought ABC and CBS would settle with him, but they did. I hope the WSJ has irrefutable proof that it was done by Trump. Although I have to agree with Don Jr. that it doesn't really sound like Trump and doodling is supposedly a sign of intelligence so...

I think that the WSJ has a lot more. The birthday love note was bait.

Agree. I think Murdoch is ready to take down Trump because of the longterm damage Trump is doing to the economy. Remember, Fox News was not on board with Trump's presidential candidacy until his nomination in 2016 became inevitable. They've supported him since only because their viewers demand it. (As evidence showed in the voting machine lawsuit, they were bleeding viewers to Newmax and OAN until they started backing up Trump's rigged voting machine claims.)

It's perfect to have WSJ expose Trump. Their readers are not the MAGA cult members drawn in by conspiracy theories-- they are mainstream Republicans who can primarily about the economy and their own wealth. It's a good strategy-- Report on Epstein to weaken Trump's hold on that part of his base, but do it from an organ of Newscorps that is an arm's length from Fox News.

The billionaires got their tax cut. The rest of Trump's agenda just hurts their bottom line.

If everything you wrote is true about Murdoch, he needs to get the NY Post and Fox News inline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

But no one else blabs about it? A friend of a friend?

You think these girls talk about this?! Geez.

The girls recruited each other. So of course they talked about it.

The girls were also complicit if they were indeed recruiting other girls. They should have been reporting these people.

Many of the girls did report him to the authorities and the FBI did nothing.

We already know that Trump's guy Alexander Acosta buried some of the complaints and cases on Epstein. At the time Acosta was USAO for the Southern District of Florida, working closely with Trump's other friend Pam Bondi on various matters. Acosta let Epstein off with a plea deal, took federal prosecution for trafficking of dozens of underaged girls off the table, and granted sweeping immunity to Ghislane Maxwell and other "potential co-conspirators." Trump rewarded Acosta by making him his Labor Secretary.