Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: the felon sues WSJ for $10 BILLION. Get your popcorn for discovery and more exposes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

Folks this is it: the MAGA civil war. Trump realizes the monied powers behind the GOP are trying to dump him for Vance. This is the formal breakup between Trump and RW media.

Holy sh#t. Get ready for Trump’s Night of the Long Knives.

Stop it with your break-up theory. The majority of MAGA is loyal to Trump.

Also, to another PP, of course the WSJ knew Trump was going to sue. It says so in the article. He was reached for comment, and he told them he would sue if they published. And on that point, history shows he's a man of his word. So obviously WSJ has the goods to back up their claim.

The question is, are Murdoch and the editor going to quash the intrepid reporters and settle with Trump? I hope not.

Who would have thought ABC and CBS would settle with him, but they did. I hope the WSJ has irrefutable proof that it was done by Trump. Although I have to agree with Don Jr. that it doesn't really sound like Trump and doodling is supposedly a sign of intelligence so...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

From the NYT article

"The single largest suspicious activity report reviewed by the congressional team was filed in late 2019 by JPMorgan for $1.1 billion. The report covered 4,700 transactions dating to 2003, including payments to women from Belarus, Russia and Turkmenistan. Many of Mr. Epstein’s victims included young women from Eastern European countries."

1.1B? 4,700 transactions?

And the public is supposed to accept that the only real offenders were Epstein and Maxwell?

The real question is why were these reported as "suspicious" only after Jeffrey Epstein was indicted.

Did JPMorgan think Epstein was importing auto parts and then selling them direct to other billionaires?

[Anonymous]

^ why these transactions were reported

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they ran in the same social circles, but it seems like once Trump realized he was a pedo in the business of blackmailing other pedos he distanced himself. It would help restore trust in the federal government if they did release an unredacted version of Epstein/Epstein Island. Hell, I’m not so sure the dude is even dead.

I can't stand Trump, but he was no protector of Epstein. Trump was immediately available to talk for hours about Epstein to a reporter (? Memory is fuzzy...maybe a prosecutor?)...which was one of the first steps toward Epstein's downfall.

They fell out over a business dealing in Florida. Not anything else.

Fake MAGA propaganda. He didn’t fall out with Epstein. Or ban him from properties. All that shit is a lie.

Possibly. My guess is that when Epstein introduced his friends to a few of his young girlfriends, some men were probably titillated at first. And then when they realized that this was actually a vast sex trafficking enterprise with dozens of girls, and that there was no way all of them could be reasonably deemed consenting... they understood they had to disentangle themselves. For legal reasons.

Pretzel logic holding up the patriarchy and billionaire class.

?? Not at all. The friends and clients were just trying to save their skins, and are guilty too. They just decided to leave the sinking ship when it was clear it was sinking and suddenly Epstein was no longer their friend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: the felon sues WSJ for $10 BILLION. Get your popcorn for discovery and more exposes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

Folks this is it: the MAGA civil war. Trump realizes the monied powers behind the GOP are trying to dump him for Vance. This is the formal breakup between Trump and RW media.

Holy sh#t. Get ready for Trump’s Night of the Long Knives.

Stop it with your break-up theory. The majority of MAGA is loyal to Trump.

Also, to another PP, of course the WSJ knew Trump was going to sue. It says so in the article. He was reached for comment, and he told them he would sue if they published. And on that point, history shows he's a man of his word. So obviously WSJ has the goods to back up their claim.

The question is, are Murdoch and the editor going to quash the intrepid reporters and settle with Trump? I hope not.

Who would have thought ABC and CBS would settle with him, but they did. I hope the WSJ has irrefutable proof that it was done by Trump. Although I have to agree with Don Jr. that it doesn't really sound like Trump and doodling is supposedly a sign of intelligence so...

Keep up. His doodles were even sold at auction, it's been credibly reported. His specialty was Manhattan skylines with his signature as sidewalk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they ran in the same social circles, but it seems like once Trump realized he was a pedo in the business of blackmailing other pedos he distanced himself. It would help restore trust in the federal government if they did release an unredacted version of Epstein/Epstein Island. Hell, I’m not so sure the dude is even dead.

I can't stand Trump, but he was no protector of Epstein. Trump was immediately available to talk for hours about Epstein to a reporter (? Memory is fuzzy...maybe a prosecutor?)...which was one of the first steps toward Epstein's downfall.

They fell out over a business dealing in Florida. Not anything else.

Fake MAGA propaganda. He didn’t fall out with Epstein. Or ban him from properties. All that shit is a lie.

Possibly. My guess is that when Epstein introduced his friends to a few of his young girlfriends, some men were probably titillated at first. And then when they realized that this was actually a vast sex trafficking enterprise with dozens of girls, and that there was no way all of them could be reasonably deemed consenting... they understood they had to disentangle themselves. For legal reasons.

Pretzel logic holding up the patriarchy and billionaire class.

?? Not at all. The friends and clients were just trying to save their skins, and are guilty too. They just decided to leave the sinking ship when it was clear it was sinking and suddenly Epstein was no longer their friend.

Except you posted that in defense of Trump. Epstein visited him in the White House, so there was no falling out. Also, pretty sure there were rumors about what was happening and these men went anyway. Yes, they are guilty. You could have led with that in your first post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: the felon sues WSJ for $10 BILLION. Get your popcorn for discovery and more exposes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

Folks this is it: the MAGA civil war. Trump realizes the monied powers behind the GOP are trying to dump him for Vance. This is the formal breakup between Trump and RW media.

Holy sh#t. Get ready for Trump’s Night of the Long Knives.

Stop it with your break-up theory. The majority of MAGA is loyal to Trump.

Also, to another PP, of course the WSJ knew Trump was going to sue. It says so in the article. He was reached for comment, and he told them he would sue if they published. And on that point, history shows he's a man of his word. So obviously WSJ has the goods to back up their claim.

The question is, are Murdoch and the editor going to quash the intrepid reporters and settle with Trump? I hope not.

Who would have thought ABC and CBS would settle with him, but they did. I hope the WSJ has irrefutable proof that it was done by Trump. Although I have to agree with Don Jr. that it doesn't really sound like Trump and doodling is supposedly a sign of intelligence so...

I think that the WSJ has a lot more. The birthday love note was bait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: the felon sues WSJ for $10 BILLION. Get your popcorn for discovery and more exposes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

Folks this is it: the MAGA civil war. Trump realizes the monied powers behind the GOP are trying to dump him for Vance. This is the formal breakup between Trump and RW media.

Holy sh#t. Get ready for Trump’s Night of the Long Knives.

Stop it with your break-up theory. The majority of MAGA is loyal to Trump.

Also, to another PP, of course the WSJ knew Trump was going to sue. It says so in the article. He was reached for comment, and he told them he would sue if they published. And on that point, history shows he's a man of his word. So obviously WSJ has the goods to back up their claim.

The question is, are Murdoch and the editor going to quash the intrepid reporters and settle with Trump? I hope not.

Who would have thought ABC and CBS would settle with him, but they did. I hope the WSJ has irrefutable proof that it was done by Trump. Although I have to agree with Don Jr. that it doesn't really sound like Trump and doodling is supposedly a sign of intelligence so...

I think that the WSJ has a lot more. The birthday love note was bait.

Don probably promised to reimburse Murdoch for the Fox settlement amount and, like Trump always does, reneged. Now it is time for Trump to pay the piper.

[Anonymous]

What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

It sounds like you have done exactly zero research. Why would you be so lazy as to expect people to explain things to you, an adult?

He answers to your first two questions, yes.

The answer to your last, no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

But no one else blabs about it? A friend of a friend?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

Melania was probably one of them…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

But no one else blabs about it? A friend of a friend?

You think these girls talk about this?! Geez.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t understand is if Trump did molest or get a naked massage from a 16 or 17 year old “model”, supplied by Epstein, why none have come forward now to tell their story. Were they paid off? Are they afraid of being killed? Or did Trump never actually sleep or cavort with anyone underage?

We've already repeatedly heard they were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and have had legal threats to keep them silent.

But no one else blabs about it? A friend of a friend?

You think these girls talk about this?! Geez.

The girls recruited each other. So of course they talked about it.