Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:?
@rorycooper
I did not anticipate Sondland also making the obstruction case.

Referring to the WH and State blocking him from accessing his notes to support his prior testimony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's the big tell that the Hunter Biden stuff is bs. The GOP had control of both houses of Congress back in 2015 and spent ZERO TIME on oversight of Burisma, etc. They could have! They certainly didn't shy away from stoking scandals. And yet they didn't. But now suddenly!

Chris?

[Anonymous]

"I do not recall any yelling or screaming"

[Anonymous]

When Nunes said that the witness should be prepared to be smeared, I don't think he envisioned the smearing to come from the right.

[Anonymous]

Wow. Sondland. Who knew? I wonder if it’s because he figures they would have thrown him under the bus anyway. Ruthlessness cuts both ways.

[Anonymous]

I just want to salute the Sondland lawyers who came up with “Did I contradict my earlier testimony? Well I might not have if the WH and DoS hadn’t blocked access to my notes,” that is a next-level flip

https://twitter.com/adamweinstein/status/1197163998657105920?s=21

[Anonymous]

What’sApp messages with Taylor and Volker. Double wow!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just want to salute the Sondland lawyers who came up with “Did I contradict my earlier testimony? Well I might not have if the WH and DoS hadn’t blocked access to my notes,” that is a next-level flip

https://twitter.com/adamweinstein/status/1197163998657105920?s=21

Yes, I didn't think Sondland was that clever (himself, or about hiring great lawyers). Kudos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just want to salute the Sondland lawyers who came up with “Did I contradict my earlier testimony? Well I might not have if the WH and DoS hadn’t blocked access to my notes,” that is a next-level flip

https://twitter.com/adamweinstein/status/1197163998657105920?s=21

I can’t believe we are seeing this. Up until now I was thinking the televised testimony might not help shore up public opinion — too many details, too procedural. This is the big time drama right here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:?
@rorycooper
I did not anticipate Sondland also making the obstruction case.

Referring to the WH and State blocking him from accessing his notes to support his prior testimony.

Yes, that question mark was supposed to be the Twitter check mark but got messed up with the cut and paste.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just want to salute the Sondland lawyers who came up with “Did I contradict my earlier testimony? Well I might not have if the WH and DoS hadn’t blocked access to my notes,” that is a next-level flip

https://twitter.com/adamweinstein/status/1197163998657105920?s=21

+1

[Anonymous]

RG is currently at home in his PJs on his couch drinking Scotch and furiously calling his lawyers.

[Anonymous]

TLDR: I will not be your scapegoat, bitches!

[Anonymous]

Sept 24th, Pompeo directed Volker to speak with Giuliani

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:RG is currently at home in his PJs on his couch drinking Scotch and furiously calling his lawyers.

I'm not sure his cognitive decline and alcoholism allow him to understand any of this.