Why are women in their 30s considered old and men are not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Eh, that goes both ways. A man in his 20s with money and a six pack is hotter than a man in his 50s with money and a six pack.

I disagree. A man in his 20s with money and a six pack probably came by it easily and has a lot of time to let it go to his head and lose it all.

A man in his 50s with money and six pack probably worked hard for it and is more likely to keep it.

Doesn't matter. We are talking solely about physical appearance. All other things being equal- money, abs, work ethic- a man in his 20s is more attractive than a man in his 50s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many women in the US don't age well. In their 20s, they could easily look 10 years older (think Janis Joplin who died at 27 looking like she was in her late 40s).

Please, she was a heavy drug user who probably didn't hit the gym.

Joplin used both meth and heroin heavily and drank heavily for several years before her death. If there is a combination that will age you, it's meth, heroin, and booze. I can't think of a worse combination for premature aging.

Appearance wise men and women age exactly the same. Sun, drugs, drinking and smoking are BIG factors in the ageing process.

[Anonymous]

Men age better because their dermis is thicker. Plus, they experience less bone loss than women do. It's been studied people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men age better because their dermis is thicker. Plus, they experience less bone loss than women do. It's been studied people.

I’ve noticed the exact opposite, that men’s skin ages more poorly. Among my friends/family/coworkers, the men have way more lines, spots, and sun damage than women the same age. I even see high school and college age guys who already have deep lines on their forehead.

I’ve also never heard a man talk about how sexy a woman’s dense bones are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's because of fertility but I think that perception is changing rapidly due to the recent studies on health risks to babies when fathers are older. The view before was that men can have kids when they're in their 40s but now people are scared of autism, etc. so male and female fertility is evening out.

Nice try. A guy in his 40s is not sweating about autism and other special needs. Yes, it's a slightly higher risk with an older dad. In absolute terms, the risk is still small.

A woman in her 40s is highly unlikely to ever have her own biological baby.

Different stakes entirely and it's not an even playing field.

I'm early 30s and have been concerned about dating men 40+ for this reason as have a couple of gfs in their late 20s. I don't think the information is widespread, however.

Congratulations, you're dumb. Please wise up for your own sake. Men 40+ are finally not boys anymore. You are in the right age bracket to snag a good one. Chop-chop, before your eggs expire. Worrying about special needs, because the man is 40+ is beyond stupid. Educate yourself about it to ease your mind.

Or enjoy singlehood. Many cats need loving homes.

Says the loser forty something man who wants to date women too young for him.

You wish How are your cats doing?

Dp. I am so tired of the cat and single woman stick. Please can we retire this?

My husband is the cat lady in our family. He was born that way. If I had not been open to having cat he might not have gotten serious with me. I’m not joking

That's a lot of people, dogs or cats. I feel it's important to have a pet especially when you have young kids. Teaches them to care for something. I've also observed people that don't like pets often have issues. Or lack empathy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll admit that my DH (43) has aged beautifully and is better looking now than he was 15 years ago. I know that’s not true for me. And this is a fairly common lament amongst my gfs.

Is your DH a tall man with "presence?" My DH fits this profile and he keeps getting more and more attractive to other women. Whatever, I don't mind.

No. He's handsome, short (5'7"), trim, well dressed, and hilarious. Women have always looked at him.

....to say, he's cute and I might sleep with him if he wasn't so short.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men age better because their dermis is thicker. Plus, they experience less bone loss than women do. It's been studied people.

I’ve noticed the exact opposite, that men’s skin ages more poorly. Among my friends/family/coworkers, the men have way more lines, spots, and sun damage than women the same age. I even see high school and college age guys who already have deep lines on their forehead.

I’ve also never heard a man talk about how sexy a woman’s dense bones are.

Such an idiot. Bone density isn't sexy in itself but one's face is not just skin. It's the skin, fat, muscle, SMAS, and bone. As women approach menopause, bone recedes and this shows up on their skin as eye bags or a witchy chin for example. Even a millimeter makes a difference. Men's bone density does not recede at the same rate as women's. So yes, their facial structure does not look as different until maybe their 70s (think Richard Gere- dang!).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men age better because their dermis is thicker. Plus, they experience less bone loss than women do. It's been studied people.

I’ve noticed the exact opposite, that men’s skin ages more poorly. Among my friends/family/coworkers, the men have way more lines, spots, and sun damage than women the same age. I even see high school and college age guys who already have deep lines on their forehead.

I’ve also never heard a man talk about how sexy a woman’s dense bones are.

Such an idiot. Bone density isn't sexy in itself but one's face is not just skin. It's the skin, fat, muscle, SMAS, and bone. As women approach menopause, bone recedes and this shows up on their skin as eye bags or a witchy chin for example. Even a millimeter makes a difference. Men's bone density does not recede at the same rate as women's. So yes, their facial structure does not look as different until maybe their 70s (think Richard Gere- dang!).

You think men don't get eye bags? Have you seen James Comey? Man, the MRAs are really scraping the bottom of the barrel arguing that they have better eye bags than women.

You can argue bone density all you want, but still doesn't change the fact that overall, men generally have more damage to their skin than women of the same age.

[Anonymous]

I'm the PP and I am a woman. I'm just saying like it is. Women dont age as well unless they try real hard like J. Lo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP and I am a woman. I'm just saying like it is. Women dont age as well unless they try real hard like J. Lo.

This has been rehashed in other threads in the beauty forum: people of color usually age better than Caucasians. General thought is because there is more melanin, less sun damage, and more moisturizing that is done since darker complexions see dryness in their skin and use lotion to hydrate before they feel it getting tight and dry. Helps ward off wrinkles and eye bags. African, Asian, Hispanic, and Indian men and women have some of the most supple beautiful skin in old age.

[Anonymous]

Because of what the media sells us. If we saw more women who haven’t had work done into their 39s & 40s we would have a more broad idea of what is attractive. Read all the interviews of actresses who have to play someone middle aged in their 30s.

[Anonymous]

Women lose their capabilities at age 30 and need to rush or else they start sliding in appeal

[Anonymous]

Fair of not, men are prized for their ability to provide and women for their looks.

However, I think men have a peak too, somewhere in mid-late 30s. That was when I still got attention from the 20-something crowd and had enough professional and financial success to attract anyone. Now I am mid-40s and I wouldn't say invisible but certainly a lot less attention than before. For women, it's probably mid-20s.

[Anonymous]

If we saw more women who haven’t had work done into their 39s & 40s we would have a more broad idea of what is attractive.

Are you claiming most older women walking around have "had work done"? I don't think so. Half of them are fat like a lot of people in this country though. That's unattractive. American women here dress less stylishly than women over in Europe. That's unattractive.

[Anonymous]

I have two friends in the pet industry. They work with pet stores, groomers, and go to dog and cat shows. Their ideal (and most common) customer is a single, never-married woman 30's and older. They have advanced in their career so they have money to spend, and they spend a lot of it on their pets.

I know every time I've tagged along with him to a groomer's salon, every client in there (the owner, not the dog) was female.

So the whole "cat lady" thing does seem accurate, based on the industry information and what I've observed.