Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP should not wait for him to file. She should file for two things:
1) Temporary custody orders that prevent the children from spending the night, or more than a certain number of nights out of state without written consent from the other parent.
2) Freezing bank accounts and assets.
She should also consider that, unless there is abuse, it will be in the best interest of the kids to spend time with both parents. If he's moving out of state, then extended stays during school breaks, that start now while they're still used to living with him, are probably going to be part of that. So, the goal probably shouldn't be to prevent him from taking them to the new state for a visit this summer. It should be to make sure that if he takes them, he takes them with official documentation that he has committed to returning them on a certain date, and a court order that means that if he tries to keep them and enroll them in school in the other state he is in contempt.
And yes, there's a good chance that he is already planning to return them, probably even better than the chance that he isn't. But as parents we take steps all the time to prevent unlikely occurrences. It's unlikely that your kid will be in an accident on their bike today, but you probably still make them wear a helmet, because bike crashes are real possibilities, even if they happen less than 50%. There is a real possibility that he is trying to position himself for primary custody, and OP should protect against that.
Excellent advice, every word.
There has to be a factual basis for these allegations or else OP will end up losing the motion and paying her husband's attorneys fees for a bad faith filing.
All the husband ever said is he is leaving her and wants to take the kids for part of the summer. He didn't threaten her. He didn't threaten them.
You file for divorce and propose a temporary custody plan. If he's not planning on taking them and not coming back, he signs and there's no problem. If he refuses to do that but just says he's planning on taking the kids out of state indefinitely, there's no bad faith filing in getting an order prohibiting that. You say, truthfully, that you are concerned about him not coming back because he refused to agree to a temporary custody plan saying he wouldn't do that.
There are any number of reasons he might not agree to a custody plan proposed by OPs lawyer that are not nefarious on his part. Do you actually expect her attorney to be totally fair to both sides in drafting his proposal?
If she files a TRO with zero factual basis she is going to have to testify why she is afraid he will take the kids out of state indefinitely.
If there is no evidence that that is his intention then she will have to explain why it will not be in the kids beat interests for Dad to have them for say half the summer.
Since OP has said absolutely nothing to suggest that her husband isn't a good parent to the child, imnit sure what that would be. It can't be just because he's a man.
OP has to be very careful with her credibility in front of the judge. Making hysterical unfounded allegations against the other parent in a divorce case is no bueno nowadays
Saying " But the bitter divorcees on DCUM told.me tondo this," is not a good plan.