How much did you sleep around in college?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The educational system you attended failed you. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You think she has some std that she has been harboring for years and that her husband needs layers of skin removed to “cure” it? This might be one of the more hilarious comments I have read on dcum. I’m very curious how old you are pp-i’m 43 and sex education was a required class in middle school and it was very extensive. maybe enroll in an online class to educate yourself before spewing your nonsense.

Sadly, you may be the densest poster on DCUM. And that is saying a lot.

You note the humor in my post ("This might be one of the more hilarious comments I have read on dcum(sic)") (thank you, BTW), but then attempt to blast me for being uneducated. Your tone reflects the fact that either the humor went right over your head (which is likely) or that you meant to imply that my post was unintentionally humorous (in which case, you did a poor job writing your post).

Bragging that you took a sex education course over 30 years ago does not make you an expert on current STD treatments, even treatments mentioned in jest.

And, just so you are aware, ablation therapy (i.e., removing layers of skin) is often used to treat certain types of STDs, such as HPV. And HPV can remain dormant for years and may require "layers of skin removed" to cure it. For more information, visit the Mayo Clinic's website at https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/hpv-infection/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20351602. So, yes, a person can have an STD (i.e., HPV) that they have harbored for years and that requires the removal of layers of skin to cure it.

Please follow your own advice and educate yourself before posting, so that you don't appear so foolish.

HPV washes away on its own within 6 months if the woman is healthy. And most women who sleep around use condoms which protect 100% from this. Layes of skin??? It's easily removable with laser and can appear in women who don't have multiple sex partners as there are literally 200 types that live in everyone's body.
There is a good vaccine since early 2000s that protects against cancerous types and many other types. I'm vaccinated and never had this infection even though I had 20+ partners.

Not the pp or the other pp discussing this but FYI condoms do not protect against HPV.

Previous pp-you are describing gentian warts that may or may not be caused by HPV. Most people with HPV never have genital warts. And you don’t need to be “run through” to get HPV as literally almost the entire population has it at least once in their lifetime. And if a married guy all the sudden needs ablation from genital warts and he has only been with his wife tat is obviously a different kind of problem he needs to look into. A urologist cannot tell how many people you or your partner has slept with by an std you have. People have gotten stds from their one and only partner (obviously the other person not so much).

Condoms provide a very good protection against HPV. Maybe not 100% but for me (I used condoms religiously and asked men for vaccination proof) it worked. Of course, condoms are not entirely protection from many STDs the best way is regular testing, vaccinations and avoiding fluid/skin contact with unknown partners. I did the combination of all of it

The best and the only correct way to prevent stds are to only have sex with your spouse, and that goes for both spouses

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Age difference is irrelevant. All sex outside of marriage is wrong and sinful

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Yup. Same with a 50 year old dating a 75 year old. Just completely different places in life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Age difference is irrelevant. All sex outside of marriage is wrong and sinful

As is sex within marriage not specifically for the purpose of procreation. Even then, if anyone enjoys themselves during the process, Jesus - the asexual son of a virgin - is going to wrinkle his nose at you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Age difference is irrelevant. All sex outside of marriage is wrong and sinful

As is sex within marriage not specifically for the purpose of procreation. Even then, if anyone enjoys themselves during the process, Jesus - the asexual son of a virgin - is going to wrinkle his nose at you.

As someone who had a vasectomy many years ago, I guess I know where I'm headed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Age difference is irrelevant. All sex outside of marriage is wrong and sinful

i’m curious why you even look at his site at all with all the “supposed sin” involved with it? You sound like a bitter old woman who is miserable and wants to make everyone else miserable. I think maybe DCUM isn’t for you. I’m sure you could find a site dedicated to others like yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Age difference is irrelevant. All sex outside of marriage is wrong and sinful

i’m curious why you even look at his site at all with all the “supposed sin” involved with it? You sound like a bitter old woman who is miserable and wants to make everyone else miserable. I think maybe DCUM isn’t for you. I’m sure you could find a site dedicated to others like yourself.

It’s so interesting how we bring our perspectives into it. I assumed the “repent” poster was a repressed man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Yup. Same with a 50 year old dating a 75 year old. Just completely different places in life.

I stand by my experience and simple facts that 21 yo woman and 28 yo man are the same generation and at the same place in life. They are at the same place family plans-wise, career-wise, looks-wise etc. A 50 yo woman and a 75 yo man are different generations and places in life (and the looks/attraction gap would be staggering).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm also curious if the women who slept around a lot in college found all their partners attractive?

I look back at my college years and wish I had slept around more in theory (no judgement there) but I honestly didn't meet many guys in college that I found sexually attractive at all. Maybe a half dozen total? Then I was super into them and would have had sex twice a day, every day. But the vast majority of college guys were just not appealing at all.

I slept with some ugly guys. They were nice people so it made up for that.

They all look the same in the dark.

I never felt like I owed sex to some ugly guys just because they were nice people. The baseline for me is always attraction AND nice to me.
So I truly don’t get it how some girls could sleep around a lot in college. Men at 18-21 yo were totally behind me developmentally . They were just drinking parting making stupid jokes and overall not good with hygiene . I could never open my legs with someone I perceived stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Age difference is irrelevant. All sex outside of marriage is wrong and sinful

As is sex within marriage not specifically for the purpose of procreation. Even then, if anyone enjoys themselves during the process, Jesus - the asexual son of a virgin - is going to wrinkle his nose at you.

As someone who had a vasectomy many years ago, I guess I know where I'm headed.

As the wise men said, "every sperm is sacred."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Yup. Same with a 50 year old dating a 75 year old. Just completely different places in life.

I stand by my experience and simple facts that 21 yo woman and 28 yo man are the same generation and at the same place in life. They are at the same place family plans-wise, career-wise, looks-wise etc. A 50 yo woman and a 75 yo man are different generations and places in life (and the looks/attraction gap would be staggering).

The reason that the 21 year old woman is interested in a 28 year old man is *because* they are in different places in life. If she had the same life experience (or money), she wouldn't find him at all interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Yup. Same with a 50 year old dating a 75 year old. Just completely different places in life.

I stand by my experience and simple facts that 21 yo woman and 28 yo man are the same generation and at the same place in life. They are at the same place family plans-wise, career-wise, looks-wise etc. A 50 yo woman and a 75 yo man are different generations and places in life (and the looks/attraction gap would be staggering).

The reason that the 21 year old woman is interested in a 28 year old man is *because* they are in different places in life. If she had the same life experience (or money), she wouldn't find him at all interesting.

100%. 7 years is not a small difference at that age. Go back a little bit-would you feel the same way about an 18 year old dating a 25 year old? Because it’s basically the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Yup. Same with a 50 year old dating a 75 year old. Just completely different places in life.

I stand by my experience and simple facts that 21 yo woman and 28 yo man are the same generation and at the same place in life. They are at the same place family plans-wise, career-wise, looks-wise etc. A 50 yo woman and a 75 yo man are different generations and places in life (and the looks/attraction gap would be staggering).

The reason that the 21 year old woman is interested in a 28 year old man is *because* they are in different places in life. If she had the same life experience (or money), she wouldn't find him at all interesting.

100%. 7 years is not a small difference at that age. Go back a little bit-would you feel the same way about an 18 year old dating a 25 year old? Because it’s basically the same.

It’s because the man was developed mentally, physically and yes, you can see from which point he begins his career. What’s wrong with that ? All of it is important if the woman wants marriage before turning 30.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women dating men 33% older than them is gross.

My 28 yo first man wouldn't have looked twice at you, trust me

Good. Too much in the news about men raping children as it is.

So many children in college, I know!

Yea, and college age girls should procreate only with acne covered college boys with greasy hair. And have orgies with crew team members on spring breaks.
They absolutely are not allowed to date late 20s men because that would be the rape

It's gross f**king someone who has been alive 1/3 longer than you.

He was only 7 years older- you just have a sick imagination. Try to figure out why sex between two young healthy people seems gross to you

New poster-but a 21 year old and a 28 year old are at two completely different places in life-so yeah it’s a little weird. But I feel the same way about a 30 year old dating a 50 year old too.

Yup. Same with a 50 year old dating a 75 year old. Just completely different places in life.

I stand by my experience and simple facts that 21 yo woman and 28 yo man are the same generation and at the same place in life. They are at the same place family plans-wise, career-wise, looks-wise etc. A 50 yo woman and a 75 yo man are different generations and places in life (and the looks/attraction gap would be staggering).

The reason that the 21 year old woman is interested in a 28 year old man is *because* they are in different places in life. If she had the same life experience (or money), she wouldn't find him at all interesting.

Lots of 28 yo early career women would have found that guy interesting. I was prettier and younger, and also had a stellar early career so he preferred dating me. There was no abusive dynamic as it would be in real large age relationships. He did enjoy me being younger and not having sexual experience as he was from a conservative family and dated to marry. Everyone was upfront about their expectations

[Anonymous]

As is sex within marriage not specifically for the purpose of procreation. Even then, if anyone enjoys themselves during the process, Jesus - the asexual son of a virgin - is going to wrinkle his nose at you.

Wut. Jesus is the living embodiment of God. As such, He has no "sexual" nature. He cannot feel lust, and since He could (and did) will mankind into being, He did not need to marry to reproduce.

If you are going to be a bigot, try to learn more about the subject matter before you do. Or remain ignorant. Up to you.

As someone up post pointed out, all the men you have been with have prayed to Him quite a bit (e.g., for negative results on their STD tests or for negative results on your pregnancy tests). Add those prayers to those of the healthcare workers who prayed that you would not infect them, and you have unintentionally done a great deal of leading others to a more prayerful life.