Kris Jenner’s birthday party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kris looked beautiful - SO much better than Lauren Sanchez.

That's a good point. Kris is not classy (far from it) but she manages to keep it together and not skank out somehow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moving my post to this post thread. I am so curious about this and it was getting lost in the talk about plastic surgery. Why were they deleted? So weird.


1) Harry and Meghan were not invited initially - This one makes no sense. If this is why they took them down then why post them in the first place?

2) Meghan and/or Harry asked to have them removed - Ok, so why pose in them in the first place? Why attend at all when it was obvious there would be cameras?

3) The palace people asked to have them removed - The only reason I could think they would care about this is because Harry was wearing a poppy for British Remembrance Day to a Kardashian party.

Thoughts on this mystery?

This is what they said on TMZ. Harry thought it was a bad look for him to be seen at such a party on Nov. 11 because it's a solemn holiday in the UK

But he decided to go, so he cared about appearances but not actual behavior. Otherwise he'd not have gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well according to People, Meghan & Harry checked "No" on the consent form for their photographs to be shared. This was somehow overlooked by Kris Jenner's team and that's why the photos were removed.

Ironically this has called even MORE attention to them. Why do they bungle everything?

Please with this! You really think this was a bungle?! This is all orchestrated. THEY WANT MORE ATTENTION. So they claim that mistakes were made, etc. The Kardashians go along with it because THEY ALSO WANT MORE ATTENTION.

The public falls for all of this because people are stupid. People magazine taking advantage of this general stupidity is their entire business model.

Eh. In this case I think we are giving them all too much credit for being Machiavellian pr experts. It looks like Meghan and Harry crashed the party after being with Serena at the baby party before KJ's. KJ was probably fine with it but didn't anticipate the drama that having M and H there might cause because there is always drama with them. Not sure KJ appreciates her bday and new face being overshadowed by this dustup.

The Kardashians have been famous for being famous for decades now. If they aren't PR experts, I don't know who is. You may not like the type of PR position they have chosen, but it has worked out just fine for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kris looked beautiful - SO much better than Lauren Sanchez.

That's a good point. Kris is not classy (far from it) but she manages to keep it together and not skank out somehow.

It's hard to believe this...but the reason she doesn't look skank is because she's not skank.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kris looked beautiful - SO much better than Lauren Sanchez.

That's a good point. Kris is not classy (far from it) but she manages to keep it together and not skank out somehow.

It's hard to believe this...but the reason she doesn't look skank is because she's not skank.

I don't know if Kris is a skank or if Sanchez is a skank, but comparing them Sanchez does look skanky whereas Kris typically does not. Interesting observation.

I assume the party pictures are heavily filtered, but even Kris's shoulders and decolletage look younger than her age, not just her heavily altered face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moving my post to this post thread. I am so curious about this and it was getting lost in the talk about plastic surgery. Why were they deleted? So weird.


1) Harry and Meghan were not invited initially - This one makes no sense. If this is why they took them down then why post them in the first place?

2) Meghan and/or Harry asked to have them removed - Ok, so why pose in them in the first place? Why attend at all when it was obvious there would be cameras?

3) The palace people asked to have them removed - The only reason I could think they would care about this is because Harry was wearing a poppy for British Remembrance Day to a Kardashian party.

Thoughts on this mystery?

This is what they said on TMZ. Harry thought it was a bad look for him to be seen at such a party on Nov. 11 because it's a solemn holiday in the UK

OK so they said it was Harry who asked, not the palace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well according to People, Meghan & Harry checked "No" on the consent form for their photographs to be shared. This was somehow overlooked by Kris Jenner's team and that's why the photos were removed.

Ironically this has called even MORE attention to them. Why do they bungle everything?

Please with this! You really think this was a bungle?! This is all orchestrated. THEY WANT MORE ATTENTION. So they claim that mistakes were made, etc. The Kardashians go along with it because THEY ALSO WANT MORE ATTENTION.

The public falls for all of this because people are stupid. People magazine taking advantage of this general stupidity is their entire business model.

Eh. In this case I think we are giving them all too much credit for being Machiavellian pr experts. It looks like Meghan and Harry crashed the party after being with Serena at the baby party before KJ's. KJ was probably fine with it but didn't anticipate the drama that having M and H there might cause because there is always drama with them. Not sure KJ appreciates her bday and new face being overshadowed by this dustup.

The Kardashians have been famous for being famous for decades now. If they aren't PR experts, I don't know who is. You may not like the type of PR position they have chosen, but it has worked out just fine for them.

They are such PR experts it's hard to believe that would make such an amateur oversight. So, it's more likely that the actual amateurs are the ones manipulating things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kris looked beautiful - SO much better than Lauren Sanchez.

That's a good point. Kris is not classy (far from it) but she manages to keep it together and not skank out somehow.

It's hard to believe this...but the reason she doesn't look skank is because she's not skank.

I don't know if Kris is a skank or if Sanchez is a skank, but comparing them Sanchez does look skanky whereas Kris typically does not. Interesting observation.

I assume the party pictures are heavily filtered, but even Kris's shoulders and decolletage look younger than her age, not just her heavily altered face.

Yes, maybe the better word choice is vulgar. They are both certainly vulgar in the private life choices and in their public portrayal of their private lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well according to People, Meghan & Harry checked "No" on the consent form for their photographs to be shared. This was somehow overlooked by Kris Jenner's team and that's why the photos were removed.

Ironically this has called even MORE attention to them. Why do they bungle everything?

Please with this! You really think this was a bungle?! This is all orchestrated. THEY WANT MORE ATTENTION. So they claim that mistakes were made, etc. The Kardashians go along with it because THEY ALSO WANT MORE ATTENTION.

The public falls for all of this because people are stupid. People magazine taking advantage of this general stupidity is their entire business model.

Eh. In this case I think we are giving them all too much credit for being Machiavellian pr experts. It looks like Meghan and Harry crashed the party after being with Serena at the baby party before KJ's. KJ was probably fine with it but didn't anticipate the drama that having M and H there might cause because there is always drama with them. Not sure KJ appreciates her bday and new face being overshadowed by this dustup.

The Kardashians have been famous for being famous for decades now. If they aren't PR experts, I don't know who is. You may not like the type of PR position they have chosen, but it has worked out just fine for them.

The Kardashian media empire is super interesting to observe. They have close ties with lots of different outlets, and the way they have a symbiotic relationship with the sports/fashion/music/real estate industries reveals how few people actually control these areas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kris looked beautiful - SO much better than Lauren Sanchez.

That's a good point. Kris is not classy (far from it) but she manages to keep it together and not skank out somehow.

It's hard to believe this...but the reason she doesn't look skank is because she's not skank.

I don't know if Kris is a skank or if Sanchez is a skank, but comparing them Sanchez does look skanky whereas Kris typically does not. Interesting observation.

I assume the party pictures are heavily filtered, but even Kris's shoulders and decolletage look younger than her age, not just her heavily altered face.

Yes, maybe the better word choice is vulgar. They are both certainly vulgar in the private life choices and in their public portrayal of their private lives.

Historically, some women have always understood that in order for one woman to look great, another woman needs to look vulgar, and so they have stepped into the vulgar role with the intention of taking full advantage of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moving my post to this post thread. I am so curious about this and it was getting lost in the talk about plastic surgery. Why were they deleted? So weird.


1) Harry and Meghan were not invited initially - This one makes no sense. If this is why they took them down then why post them in the first place?

2) Meghan and/or Harry asked to have them removed - Ok, so why pose in them in the first place? Why attend at all when it was obvious there would be cameras?

3) The palace people asked to have them removed - The only reason I could think they would care about this is because Harry was wearing a poppy for British Remembrance Day to a Kardashian party.

Thoughts on this mystery?

This is what they said on TMZ. Harry thought it was a bad look for him to be seen at such a party on Nov. 11 because it's a solemn holiday in the UK

OK so they said it was Harry who asked, not the palace.

He’s probably having flashbacks to his Nazi armband days. Rewind! Not his fault!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well according to People, Meghan & Harry checked "No" on the consent form for their photographs to be shared. This was somehow overlooked by Kris Jenner's team and that's why the photos were removed.

Ironically this has called even MORE attention to them. Why do they bungle everything?

You get that if THEY didn’t consent to pics being posted and the Kardashians’ team posted them anyway that the Kardashians bungled this, not “Hazza and Me-Gain” as you all love to call them.

The consent form was about being on the show - KUWTK. Not for posting pics. My guess is that K and K just deleted the pics bc Harry and Meghan were throwing a fit about them for various reasons and they threw that reasoning into the mix. I wonder if Harry was inebriated and woke up the next day with hanxiety about partying with the Kardashians while wearing a poppy. Even he would know that is not couth.

No. The consent form was for photos being posted.

https://people.com/why-meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-were-deleted-from-kim-kardashian-and-kris-jenner-birthday-photo-drop-11848509

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kris looked beautiful - SO much better than Lauren Sanchez.

That's a good point. Kris is not classy (far from it) but she manages to keep it together and not skank out somehow.

It's hard to believe this...but the reason she doesn't look skank is because she's not skank.

I don't know if Kris is a skank or if Sanchez is a skank, but comparing them Sanchez does look skanky whereas Kris typically does not. Interesting observation.

I assume the party pictures are heavily filtered, but even Kris's shoulders and decolletage look younger than her age, not just her heavily altered face.

Yes, maybe the better word choice is vulgar. They are both certainly vulgar in the private life choices and in their public portrayal of their private lives.

Historically, some women have always understood that in order for one woman to look great, another woman needs to look vulgar, and so they have stepped into the vulgar role with the intention of taking full advantage of it.

Ideas like this are so bizarre.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well according to People, Meghan & Harry checked "No" on the consent form for their photographs to be shared. This was somehow overlooked by Kris Jenner's team and that's why the photos were removed.

But they did take pictures, since they are clearly posing in some of the released pics. It doesn't make much sense.

No it makes perfect sense. They said pics could be taken just not posted. The consent was for photo release not photography altogether

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moving my post to this post thread. I am so curious about this and it was getting lost in the talk about plastic surgery. Why were they deleted? So weird.


1) Harry and Meghan were not invited initially - This one makes no sense. If this is why they took them down then why post them in the first place?

2) Meghan and/or Harry asked to have them removed - Ok, so why pose in them in the first place? Why attend at all when it was obvious there would be cameras?

3) The palace people asked to have them removed - The only reason I could think they would care about this is because Harry was wearing a poppy for British Remembrance Day to a Kardashian party.

Thoughts on this mystery?

This is what they said on TMZ. Harry thought it was a bad look for him to be seen at such a party on Nov. 11 because it's a solemn holiday in the UK

Well the party was on November 8, so.