yes during back to school time. |
Not sure your derisive use of "doing your own research" is the best way to put it when someone is following the public health recommendation of the vast majority of developed countries. But yes, if the pandemic has shown us one thing, it is how easily even scientists can be captured by groupthink and abandon rigorous standards of evidence. Not only in the US, although I think it was worst here, probably because of the extreme political polarization. As an academic (not in a scientific field), it has shocked me to observe that. |
Not believing in American infallibility doesn't equal contempt for America. If America is alone in making these recommendations, it is not only legitimate, but imperative to question the basis of it. If you truly look at the evidence and decide that it is sound, that's your call. But saying "because the CDC says so" doesn't cut it, especially for a research scientist. |
What? That is utter nonsense. Why would you even believe this? |
Because they have functioning brain cells. |
+10000 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fixed it for you. OMG. stfu already about “reality” until you deal intelligently with the very real risks of myocarditis for boys and young men from having Covid, as well as their very low risk of complications from the vaccine. It’s truly the height of delusion and arrogance to pretend you have some lock on “reality.” |
They never consider this when they make this argument. Pre covid the exact same posts popped up every fall with people going on about not getting flu shots. The arguments are almost exactly the same with it boiling down to people who don't trust the gubment vs those who think they are just inherently more intelligent than everyone else. |
DP. But what if we haven’t been boosted since 2021 and we still have incredibly mild symptoms when we actually get Covid in 2024? What does that make a case for? |
DP. The problem is that the vaccine doesn't prevent Covid infection, so the risk of myocarditis from the vaccine gets added on to the risk of myocarditis from infection. If you want to dispute that by claiming that the vaccine lessens the risk of getting myocarditis from the inevitable infection, please present evidence. There is none. There isn't even evidence that annual boosters lessen disease severity in people who are already vaccinated and/or have already had Covid, and there certainly isn't evidence that the risk of myocarditis from Covid infection is lowered by getting boosted. |
+1 I'm the PP who had mild covid symptoms. I always get my flu shot. |
No way.
Our family got the first 2 shots. The whole vaccine situation in this country was handled with clear profits in mind for pharma, trust on my end is gone. I’d rather not feed that beast every year. Plus shots made me feel worse than actual covid did (I got omicron in March 2022) Data shows such a minimal protection and for such a short period of time. Covid was such a nothing burger for my 14 year old and my 16 yo has either never had it (or if she did, she was asymptomatic). My family is vaccinated with the required shots but none of us have ever gotten a flu shot either and my kids have gotten the flu once and I haven’t had the flu since 1999. Blah blah science but I’ve never found any real studies comparing people who never get flu shots and people who get them yearly - I feel there is something there. I still remember 2009 h1n1 and that the people who got the standard flu shot that year were more susceptible to h1n1 and that is curious to me. The covid shot is always behind the variants so think about it … |
This argument is the classic cop out for Americans who are either unable or unwilling to critically assess the evidence for an intervention. I've heard it for routine infant circumcision (on which America is also an outlier) and now for Covid boosters. It's getting old, and there is no evidence it is true. |
No, because there is no evidence in this age group that these yearly shots change outcomes.
|