Harris' 60 Minutes interview

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.

First of all, this is about her on 60 Minutes. It's not about Trump.

Secondly, why is she spending on paragraphs of commentary stating the obvious?

"We are a diverse people". No kiddng,! Are you trying to run out the clock with word salad, obvious sound bites and platitudes? It's maddening.

She is going to have to tackle the most complicated subjects and decisions of anyone in the world and I'm not sure she can. She is shallow, rotates around social issues and does not have the depth of knowledge that many others would. You have to deal with international problems, trade, defense, economics and many other issues. After 4 years as VP, this is the best she can cobble together? I don't have the confidence she has the life experience to do it. It's disturbing.

Sexist.

[Anonymous]

DISASTER

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.

First of all, this is about her on 60 Minutes. It's not about Trump.

Secondly, why is she spending on paragraphs of commentary stating the obvious?

"We are a diverse people". No kiddng,! Are you trying to run out the clock with word salad, obvious sound bites and platitudes? It's maddening.

She is going to have to tackle the most complicated subjects and decisions of anyone in the world and I'm not sure she can. She is shallow, rotates around social issues and does not have the depth of knowledge that many others would. You have to deal with international problems, trade, defense, economics and many other issues. After 4 years as VP, this is the best she can cobble together? I don't have the confidence she has the life experience to do it. It's disturbing.

I’m concerned that Trump lied about losing an election and then stood quietly by when a mob attacked the Capitol while Congress was in session. It’s disturbing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.

First of all, this is about her on 60 Minutes. It's not about Trump.

Secondly, why is she spending on paragraphs of commentary stating the obvious?

"We are a diverse people". No kiddng,! Are you trying to run out the clock with word salad, obvious sound bites and platitudes? It's maddening.

She is going to have to tackle the most complicated subjects and decisions of anyone in the world and I'm not sure she can. She is shallow, rotates around social issues and does not have the depth of knowledge that many others would. You have to deal with international problems, trade, defense, economics and many other issues. After 4 years as VP, this is the best she can cobble together? I don't have the confidence she has the life experience to do it. It's disturbing.

Sexist.

Nope. Hillary Clinton had what's needed in depth and breadth of experience. Tulsi Gabbard, Madeline Albright or Jean Shaheen also.

She is just vapid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.

First of all, this is about her on 60 Minutes. It's not about Trump.

Secondly, why is she spending on paragraphs of commentary stating the obvious?

"We are a diverse people". No kiddng,! Are you trying to run out the clock with word salad, obvious sound bites and platitudes? It's maddening.

She is going to have to tackle the most complicated subjects and decisions of anyone in the world and I'm not sure she can. She is shallow, rotates around social issues and does not have the depth of knowledge that many others would. You have to deal with international problems, trade, defense, economics and many other issues. After 4 years as VP, this is the best she can cobble together? I don't have the confidence she has the life experience to do it. It's disturbing.

I’m concerned that Trump lied about losing an election and then stood quietly by when a mob attacked the Capitol while Congress was in session. It’s disturbing.

This is not about Trump. Try answering without referring to him. You can't. She is not prepared for the office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No real answers on Israel. No real answers on Ukraine. What are her policies? What are we voting for?

Well, non pussy grabbers for starters. If that's not enough, then Trump's f-ed up economic plan (let's tax food to make it cheaper -- huh?!). If that's not still enough, how about to avoid a leader who has openly stated change is hoax when states can no longer keep up with environmental catastrophes.

nothing wrong grabbing a "woman" by the pussy, that wants to be grabbed by the pussy. You weren't there Karen.

E. Jean Carroll was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DISASTER

Yelling doesn’t make it true.

You seem a bit panic stricken bro. Relax, lay back and let it happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.

First of all, this is about her on 60 Minutes. It's not about Trump.

Secondly, why is she spending on paragraphs of commentary stating the obvious?

"We are a diverse people". No kiddng,! Are you trying to run out the clock with word salad, obvious sound bites and platitudes? It's maddening.

She is going to have to tackle the most complicated subjects and decisions of anyone in the world and I'm not sure she can. She is shallow, rotates around social issues and does not have the depth of knowledge that many others would. You have to deal with international problems, trade, defense, economics and many other issues. After 4 years as VP, this is the best she can cobble together? I don't have the confidence she has the life experience to do it. It's disturbing.

Sexist.

Nope. Hillary Clinton had what's needed in depth and breadth of experience. Tulsi Gabbard, Madeline Albright or Jean Shaheen also.

She is just vapid.

No. She’s not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.

First of all, this is about her on 60 Minutes. It's not about Trump.

Secondly, why is she spending on paragraphs of commentary stating the obvious?

"We are a diverse people". No kiddng,! Are you trying to run out the clock with word salad, obvious sound bites and platitudes? It's maddening.

She is going to have to tackle the most complicated subjects and decisions of anyone in the world and I'm not sure she can. She is shallow, rotates around social issues and does not have the depth of knowledge that many others would. You have to deal with international problems, trade, defense, economics and many other issues. After 4 years as VP, this is the best she can cobble together? I don't have the confidence she has the life experience to do it. It's disturbing.

I’m concerned that Trump lied about losing an election and then stood quietly by when a mob attacked the Capitol while Congress was in session. It’s disturbing.

This is not about Trump. Try answering without referring to him. You can't. She is not prepared for the office.

Of course this is about Trump. You have 2 choices in this election and Trump is one of them. So it doesn’t actually matter in the end who his opponent is as long as it’s not Beelzebub or Kim Jong Un or reincarnated Hitler. Trump is 100% unfit for office and you can natter on all you want saying Harris isn’t prepared for office - she is - but even if she weren’t she’s still 10000x more prepared and more fit than Trump. So again 2 choices and one of them is Trump which the other automatically gets my vote. No matter what you say about her. Because she is still 10000x better than Trump. Fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DISASTER

Yelling doesn’t make it true.

You seem a bit panic stricken bro. Relax, lay back and let it happen.

My keyboard, my choice.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

The MAGA trolls are getting desperate. The narrative that Harris won’t speak to voters or do interviews has collapsed. Harris is doing well. And she’s for sure a lot tougher than Trump who would disintegrate with a tenth of the picayune criticism that Harris has received.

She crushed it in the three appearances I saw this week.

As opposed to deranged incoherent Trump who refused to go on 60 Minutes and demanded an apology from 60 Minutes over his horrible interview with Leslie Stahl where he stormed off the set - and the reason he cited for wanting an apology was that he claimed Stahl said the Hunter laptop came from Russia - which Stahl never even said.

First of all, this is about her on 60 Minutes. It's not about Trump.

Secondly, why is she spending on paragraphs of commentary stating the obvious?

"We are a diverse people". No kiddng,! Are you trying to run out the clock with word salad, obvious sound bites and platitudes? It's maddening.

She is going to have to tackle the most complicated subjects and decisions of anyone in the world and I'm not sure she can. She is shallow, rotates around social issues and does not have the depth of knowledge that many others would. You have to deal with international problems, trade, defense, economics and many other issues. After 4 years as VP, this is the best she can cobble together? I don't have the confidence she has the life experience to do it. It's disturbing.

I’m concerned that Trump lied about losing an election and then stood quietly by when a mob attacked the Capitol while Congress was in session. It’s disturbing.

This is not about Trump. Try answering without referring to him. You can't. She is not prepared for the office.

Trump was too chicken to show up. Harris is extraordinarily qualified. She owned him in the one time he went toe to toe with her. He had nothing but gibberish and lies. He’s a cowardly wimp who knows even less than he did four years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DISASTER

Sadly, have to agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The interview was fine, but they edited it really awkwardly and at other times, did voice over rather than play her response. I guess I found it frustrating because of the producers, not Harris.

They will never allow an unedited interview or a non-scripted speech from her. Never.
It would shock most people to really hear her speak without help.

"they?"

You think 60 Minutes left editorial to the campaign?

example of word salad editing.

[Anonymous]

This is extremely discrediting for 60 minutes. Trump made the right choice to decline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No real answers on Israel. No real answers on Ukraine. What are her policies? What are we voting for?

4 more years of the same, but even more extreme.