Pandemonium in the UK/Ireland

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it



Uh... maybe read a book. The history of Islam is a history of invasion - from the Arabian Peninsula to Central Asia to Africa to the gates of Vienna. And please do tell the people of Asia and the South Pacific that they weren't actually invaded by Japan less than a hundred years ago. Just a bad dream.


Uh, we aren’t talking about centuries ago. I am talking about today.

Today, the US and EU are the prime colonialist forces so you break, you buy.

The Islamic empire expansions also didn’t last too well because of globalization, race mixing from Moor to white, immigration and too much war . They lost their Islamic religion in Southern Europe back to Christianity.

Again, the colonial empire of today is the West and much like the East before them, they will also lose their culture and standing over time due to the same forces I mentioned above but all roads lead back to war as the cause of immigration and bankrupting empires. It happened with the Roman Empire too. Too much immigration and too much war/foreign spending and not more isolationism


You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it



Uh... maybe read a book. The history of Islam is a history of invasion - from the Arabian Peninsula to Central Asia to Africa to the gates of Vienna. And please do tell the people of Asia and the South Pacific that they weren't actually invaded by Japan less than a hundred years ago. Just a bad dream.


Uh, we aren’t talking about centuries ago. I am talking about today.

Today, the US and EU are the prime colonialist forces so you break, you buy.

The Islamic empire expansions also didn’t last too well because of globalization, race mixing from Moor to white, immigration and too much war . They lost their Islamic religion in Southern Europe back to Christianity.

Again, the colonial empire of today is the West and much like the East before them, they will also lose their culture and standing over time due to the same forces I mentioned above but all roads lead back to war as the cause of immigration and bankrupting empires. It happened with the Roman Empire too. Too much immigration and too much war/foreign spending and not more isolationism


You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.


I know exactly what it means. The US and NATO are a neo colonial force. What exactly do you think an American company Blackrock buying up Ukraine and Halliburton in Iraq is if not colonialism? These wars are boosting our economies. It’s a nation building enterprise by another nation which is exactly what colonialism is
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.



You said it well, PP.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


I'm not condoning the riots and violence occurring all over the UK/Ireland. However, I do, to some degree, understand it because what PP states above is true. And this isn't just happening in the UK/Ireland. Just google "Are European countries losing their cultural identities through mass immigration?" and see what pops up. Political parties across Europe who are alt-right and very anti-immigration are gaining momentum for this very reason.

POLITICO reported that in nearly a dozen European countries, including France and Germany, hardline anti-immigration parties, some of them more extreme than the Netherlands’ Geert Wilders, are currently topping the polls, or in a close second place.

Source: https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-braces-for-far-right-wave-as-eu-election-looms/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it


You're kidding, right?
A few reminders:

Repeated Mongol invasions and rape of Europe
North African invasion and colonization of the Iberian Peninsula
Ditto with the concurrent Arab invasion and colonization of the Iberian Peninsula
Japanese incursions in China
Japanese incursions in Korea
Chinese incursions and influence peddling in Southeast Asia

These are off the top of my head from grade school. I'm sure any history buffs can provide more.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it


You're kidding, right?
A few reminders:

Repeated Mongol invasions and rape of Europe
North African invasion and colonization of the Iberian Peninsula
Ditto with the concurrent Arab invasion and colonization of the Iberian Peninsula
Japanese incursions in China
Japanese incursions in Korea
Chinese incursions and influence peddling in Southeast Asia

These are off the top of my head from grade school. I'm sure any history buffs can provide more.




I never said that Europe were the only colonial forces so I don’t understand why this devolved into a history lesson.

The same forces that weakened the East are weakening the West and that’s globalism, expansionism, and war. The first two along with factor 3 all increase immigration and deficits. It slowly bankrupts a nation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


I think you mean Gaelic, not Celtic.

I do agree with you about the Asian countries you mentioned, but not about multiculturalism in general. I live in what has been called the world’s most diverse city. In the past twenty years, on any given day I might hear a dozen languages spoken outside before I hear English. And it has been a very peaceful city where everyone has pretty much always gotten along. Problems have only started in the past couple of years, because our government rapidly imported a million people from a very specific region of the world, and they pretty much settled in this city. The problem isn’t immigration. Immigration is what made my city great. The problem is rapid mass immigration of only one group, and often it’s only young men, to a relatively small area.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it



Ohh yes, Ireland invaded sooooo many countries.

And lol. China and Japan invaded many countries in their history. Someone is oblivious to the entire history of Imperial Japan. Even Muslim countries invade tons of other countries through millennia of world histories.

You break it you buy......dumb logic for European countries only.


How do you know these countries don’t get migrants? Egypt and Libya get tons of migrants from Africa and the broader ME. All of North Africa does and they complain about it.

Saudi Arabia gets tons of Ethiopian and Filipino migrants. Japan gets migrants too. UAE is mostly Indians and ex pats. Dubai is pretty much Las Vegas now and you don’t think they don’t say their culture is eroding because it’s getting more secular and Westernized?

These frustrations with immigration are not only special to Ireland.

Open your eyes. It happens everywhere


DP. Others have corrected your ignorance about Japanese and Islamic imperialism. Also, you're being pretty arbitrary about the word "recently." Ask Bulgarians and others whether they enjoyed being under Ottoman rule just a century ago.

So I'll just point out that the "migrants" you talk about in the Middle East were invited in to do work wealthy UAE natives don't do themselves. Yes, Dubai is only 10% indigenous, but without the expat middle managers, architects, IT wizzes, Philippino maids, and so on, the country wouldn't function. Also, Dubai is welcoming foreign tourists with open arms--like it or not, it's part of their plan to diversify the economy beyond oil. Watch one of the many documentaries about Dubai's architecture, that hotel that looks like a sailboat (designed, yes, for tourists), or the "world" of islands they created to attract foreign investment. Yes, Dubai is tacky and weird (I was just there), but you're just wrong to claim they're being overrun by foreigners against their collective will.
Anonymous
Can’t have those dirty foreigners invading and providing…nursing services.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/sunderland-rioters-throw-rocks-filipino-33391948
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it



Ohh yes, Ireland invaded sooooo many countries.

And lol. China and Japan invaded many countries in their history. Someone is oblivious to the entire history of Imperial Japan. Even Muslim countries invade tons of other countries through millennia of world histories.

You break it you buy......dumb logic for European countries only.


How do you know these countries don’t get migrants? Egypt and Libya get tons of migrants from Africa and the broader ME. All of North Africa does and they complain about it.

Saudi Arabia gets tons of Ethiopian and Filipino migrants. Japan gets migrants too. UAE is mostly Indians and ex pats. Dubai is pretty much Las Vegas now and you don’t think they don’t say their culture is eroding because it’s getting more secular and Westernized?

These frustrations with immigration are not only special to Ireland.

Open your eyes. It happens everywhere



Lolololololo

Clearly you've never been to Japan. They do not get anywhere near the same quantity of mass migration as Ireland. 20% of the entire country of Ireland is now non native.. Japan still nearly 99% homogenous. Japan invaded pretty much all of east Asia,.killed millions, and broke a lot of stuff during their imperial era..so much for your stupid logic. Meanwhile, the Irish have never colonized anyone in their entire history.

How long must the Irish tolerate foreigners coming in before it is too late and their entire culture can no longer survive? Why should Ireland be forced to take it up the wazoo while it is perfectly acceptable for South Korea, Japan and China to have strong policies to remain virtually 100% racially and ethnically homogenous.


They don’t have to take it but Ireland is not just Ireland anymore. It’s part of the EU.

The EU is about giving up your sovereignty and your countries borders and becoming nothing but a lapdog of the USA and the Neo liberal interests of interventionist wars to spread liberal democracy worldwide.

Trump is right about the EU and NATO being pointless. Isolationism and nationalism is what Europe needs not globalism but that isn’t what the establishment and special interests believes makes countries great.


As with everything, the EU has its pros and cons. Unfortunately, they are feeling the negative affects of "open borders" just as we are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it


Come again? What did Ireland invade and break? lol…

I’m Irish. Read some history before spouting such nonsense.
Anonymous
Unfortunately, these conflicts are likely to get worse. Immigration creates conflict if people do not assimilate well with the existing community. The internet has lessened assimilation because it allows people to maintain cultural connections with their country of origin. Large levels of immigration from a single country also enable cultural isolation and fragmentation. Immigration to the UK is very concentrated from specific countries (in comparison to the US) and I don't see a realistic solution to reduce tensions.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it



Ohh yes, Ireland invaded sooooo many countries.

And lol. China and Japan invaded many countries in their history. Someone is oblivious to the entire history of Imperial Japan. Even Muslim countries invade tons of other countries through millennia of world histories.

You break it you buy......dumb logic for European countries only.


How do you know these countries don’t get migrants? Egypt and Libya get tons of migrants from Africa and the broader ME. All of North Africa does and they complain about it.

Saudi Arabia gets tons of Ethiopian and Filipino migrants. Japan gets migrants too. UAE is mostly Indians and ex pats. Dubai is pretty much Las Vegas now and you don’t think they don’t say their culture is eroding because it’s getting more secular and Westernized?

These frustrations with immigration are not only special to Ireland.

Open your eyes. It happens everywhere


DP. Others have corrected your ignorance about Japanese and Islamic imperialism. Also, you're being pretty arbitrary about the word "recently." Ask Bulgarians and others whether they enjoyed being under Ottoman rule just a century ago.

So I'll just point out that the "migrants" you talk about in the Middle East were invited in to do work wealthy UAE natives don't do themselves. Yes, Dubai is only 10% indigenous, but without the expat middle managers, architects, IT wizzes, Philippino maids, and so on, the country wouldn't function. Also, Dubai is welcoming foreign tourists with open arms--like it or not, it's part of their plan to diversify the economy beyond oil. Watch one of the many documentaries about Dubai's architecture, that hotel that looks like a sailboat (designed, yes, for tourists), or the "world" of islands they created to attract foreign investment. Yes, Dubai is tacky and weird (I was just there), but you're just wrong to claim they're being overrun by foreigners against their collective will.


I never displayed any ignorance toward Eastern imperialism nor did I say colonialism was started in the West. People are getting defensive here for no reason.

PP asked why Asia doesn’t get an influx of migrants in comparison and I said it is because recently Asia is not warmongering and trying to intervene and spread democracy through the sword. Asia is mostly isolationist and not into regime change wars
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it


You're kidding, right?
A few reminders:

Repeated Mongol invasions and rape of Europe
North African invasion and colonization of the Iberian Peninsula
Ditto with the concurrent Arab invasion and colonization of the Iberian Peninsula
Japanese incursions in China
Japanese incursions in Korea
Chinese incursions and influence peddling in Southeast Asia

These are off the top of my head from grade school. I'm sure any history buffs can provide more.




So you believe that the current wave of mass migration is an invasion like the examples you have listed?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm just curious as to why it is always up to European countries and white countries to have never ending acceptance of mass migration. Any time European countries want to preserve their heritage and identity of is 'racist'. Yet you don't see the same liberal outrage directed at countries like Japan, South Korea, China, etc. who are all wealthy nations that could share their development but they don't because they firmly want to stay Asian only.

People will just have to to accept cultures were never meant to mix. People of different races weren't meant to mix. People of different nations weren't meant to mix. It's fine to interact, but there is just too much tension based on any number of identity issues. What's Ireland going to do when the the entire Irish population is overwhelmed by foreigners who have no ethnic background from Ireland, know zero Celtic, and have no traditions associated with something as basic as knowing Irish dance, folk music or folklore? What happens is Irish culture and heritage dies.

Globalists and liberals who think everyone can mix and sing kumbaya together for the rest of history are living in a Dreamland. Multiculturalism is a sham that is code word for cultural suicide. I just don't understand why any country would or should sign up for it and why people think it is good. Humans are just tribal creatures by nature and need to stick to their own. There's nothing wrong with it.


Asian countries didn’t invade these countries or interfere to spread democracy. That was the delusional West.

You break it, you buy it



Ohh yes, Ireland invaded sooooo many countries.

And lol. China and Japan invaded many countries in their history. Someone is oblivious to the entire history of Imperial Japan. Even Muslim countries invade tons of other countries through millennia of world histories.

You break it you buy......dumb logic for European countries only.


How do you know these countries don’t get migrants? Egypt and Libya get tons of migrants from Africa and the broader ME. All of North Africa does and they complain about it.

Saudi Arabia gets tons of Ethiopian and Filipino migrants. Japan gets migrants too. UAE is mostly Indians and ex pats. Dubai is pretty much Las Vegas now and you don’t think they don’t say their culture is eroding because it’s getting more secular and Westernized?

These frustrations with immigration are not only special to Ireland.

Open your eyes. It happens everywhere


DP. Others have corrected your ignorance about Japanese and Islamic imperialism. Also, you're being pretty arbitrary about the word "recently." Ask Bulgarians and others whether they enjoyed being under Ottoman rule just a century ago.

So I'll just point out that the "migrants" you talk about in the Middle East were invited in to do work wealthy UAE natives don't do themselves. Yes, Dubai is only 10% indigenous, but without the expat middle managers, architects, IT wizzes, Philippino maids, and so on, the country wouldn't function. Also, Dubai is welcoming foreign tourists with open arms--like it or not, it's part of their plan to diversify the economy beyond oil. Watch one of the many documentaries about Dubai's architecture, that hotel that looks like a sailboat (designed, yes, for tourists), or the "world" of islands they created to attract foreign investment. Yes, Dubai is tacky and weird (I was just there), but you're just wrong to claim they're being overrun by foreigners against their collective will.


I never displayed any ignorance toward Eastern imperialism nor did I say colonialism was started in the West. People are getting defensive here for no reason.

PP asked why Asia doesn’t get an influx of migrants in comparison and I said it is because recently Asia is not warmongering and trying to intervene and spread democracy through the sword. Asia is mostly isolationist and not into regime change wars


OR its bc Asia doesnt have anything anyone wants to risk their life to migrate for.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: