What ever happen to jeffrey epstein files ?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Trump is a rapist and maniac. |
Anonymous
Your alternate reality is quite a spectacle. The entire Democrat Party defend Clinton. |
Anonymous
True. |
Anonymous
And, of course, Epstein was well known for his honesty and forthrightness. There would be no reason to doubt his word. |
Anonymous
DP... I don't care about Clinton, he isn't running for office. What's your excuse for defending Trump? |
Anonymous
+1 Not a single one of them can state in a simple way that that would change their support for Trump. It’s a fairly low hurdle to clear. I think on some level a lot of Republicans already think Trump is guilty of pedophilia and they’ve decided that’s okay. |
Anonymous
We aren't going to play games of hypotheticals. |
Anonymous
|
13 year old accused trump of raping her but dropped law suit. This is a harrowing story.
https://l.smartnews.com/p-4zej3/294XXD |
Anonymous
The author of your link is Perez Hilton. Are you a child? |
Anonymous
Same story whose debunking has been posted here multiple times. Give it up. |
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
Your tweet has no sources. Where are the sources and cites? A screenshot of a tweet isn’t adequate. |
Anonymous
No sources? You somehow seem to have missed the fact that the tweet names specific names as the source of the information: Ghislane Maxwell as primary source and Ira Rosen as who it was told to. |
Anonymous
It wasn't "debunked" - the case was real, the deposition is real, but the case was made to "go away" - and we already knows that Trump makes cases go away with hush money. |
Anonymous
The lawsuit accusing Trump of raping a 13-year-old girl, explained The anonymous plaintiff dropped her lawsuit against Trump, the circumstances around which have been bizarre. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation The woman, who has gone by the pseudonyms “Katie Johnson” and “Jane Doe,” was set to appear at a press conference at the law offices of Lisa Bloom, a high-profile civil rights attorney and TV commentator. But the woman didn’t come to the press conference. Bloom told a room full of waiting reporters that Johnson was afraid to show her face after receiving multiple death threats, and that they would have to reschedule. (she only used fake names, how would she receive death threats? Any evidence of deaths threats? Any legal action taken against the people who made the death threats? Any arrests? No. Did Lisa Bloom ever reschedule the press conference? NO.) Bloom said that her firm’s website was hacked, that Anonymous had claimed responsibility, and that death threats and a bomb threat came in afterwards. (But no arrests?) Johnson claimed that Trump violently raped her when she was 13 at a 1994 orgy hosted by Jeffrey Epstein — the billionaire who was convicted in 2008 of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution. (Has anyone else accused Epstein of holding orgies? Anyone?) The court filings also included a statement from “Tiffany Doe,” another anonymous woman, who said that she witnessed the rapes and procured the young girls for the parties, and “Joan Doe,” a classmate of the victim who said she was told about the rapes during the following school year. Tiffany Doe said that Epstein and Trump knew that Johnson was 13. (All anonymous. Hmmmm) The lawsuit Johnson filed in New York was actually her second attempt to sue Trump and Epstein. The first was in California in April of this year, a claim Johnson filed herself that got thrown out on technical grounds — she’d filed a civil rights suit, but failed to actually state an applicable civil rights claim. There were a couple of odd things about that lawsuit. The address listed on court documents as Johnson’s was actually a foreclosed, abandoned home, and the phone number was disconnected. Maybe Johnson was just using a fake address because she was homeless; she was, after all, also described as being indigent. But it’s fishy. The lawsuit also described details that were so lurid — “almost cinematic in their depravity,” as Jezebel’s Anna Merlan put it — that they’re almost hard to believe. Some of those details were omitted from the second lawsuit, the New York Daily News reported: Gone from the new lawsuit is an allegation that Trump threw money at the plaintiff for an abortion when she expressed fear about getting pregnant after being raped. Gone, too, is the allegation that Trump called co-defendant and accused pedophile and sex party host Jeffrey Epstein a “Jew bastard,” and her request for $100 million in damages. (only $100 million?) “The allegations are not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level and clearly framed to solicit media attention or, perhaps, are simply politically motivated,” Trump told RadarOnline in April, after the first lawsuit was filed. “There is absolutely no merit to these allegations. Period.” This spring, a man called “Al Taylor” sent a video of a woman with a blurred face and blonde wig (allegedly Johnson) recounting the allegations against Trump to news outlets, saying he wanted $1 million for it. Taylor, the Guardian reported, was actually Norm Lubow, a former producer on the Jerry Springer show who has a history of using fake names and disguises to make juicy, false claims about celebrities. (a Jerry Springer show producer? Using a fake name, too? Huh.) Baer told Emily Shugerman at Revelist that Taylor met Johnson at a party and asked her if she had any good celebrity gossip. When she talked about her assault, Taylor apparently didn’t want to touch the story at first, but then circled back with Johnson about it once Trump’s campaign started picking up steam. (met at a party, ok.) To hear journalists who interacted with them tell it, Baer and Taylor come off as obnoxiously persistent in pushing the story, and infuriatingly evasive when asked for interviews with Johnson. Jezebel’s Anna Merlan published a long account of their bizarre antics. Taylor in particular comes across as volatile and a little scary; Merlan reported that Taylor told her to “suck my dick” when she confronted him about his identity, and that he made harassing phone calls to other journalists. He also appears to have sent at least a few text messages and emails while posing as Katie Johnson — or at least messages that Meagher, Johnson’s attorney, denies that Johnson sent. Three days later, close to midnight, Shugerman finally talked to Johnson over the phone in a conference call with Meagher. There were some odd things about that call, Shugerman writes: Johnson's voice sounded muffled and far away when she answered — she said she was speaking softly because she didn’t want anyone to overhear her. Several times she paused mid-sentence, and I could hear her moving something. "She has dogs," Meagher explained. Shugerman says Johnson was “vague” in her descriptions of Epstein’s parties and how many people were there, and wouldn’t go into details about what she was asked to do. Some of the details she did give were consistent with descriptions of Epstein and his house Vicky Ward listed in a 2003 Vanity Fair profile — which could either lend credence to Johnson’s story, or suggest that “Johnson” just read the Vanity Fair story as research. Most troublingly, a detective who worked with Epstein’s victims called into question a key part of Johnson’s story: Hearing her answers that night, I had to remind myself that PTSD from sexual trauma is known to damage victims' memories — and that the parties she recalled allegedly happened more than two decades ago. But Mike Fisten, a retired Miami-Dade detective who conducted research for several of Epstein's victims, denied such parties ever even took place. "Jeffery never had parties like described in their complaint," Fisten told me. "Jeffery had sex parties, for sure, with two or three girls … but never with other guys." There were men in attendance at Epstein’s more large, lavish affairs, Fisten said, but nothing illicit ever happened at such events. “I don't know if the Katie Johnson I spoke to is the same girl who Trump allegedly raped in 1994, or if that girl even exists,” Shugerman concluded in her piece. But the Clinton campaign hasn’t touched Johnson’s allegation, and with good reason. It’s true that the allegation is explosive, andcould make voters see Trump’s many disturbing comments about young girls over the years in a new light. But it’s also very dubious and uncertain. (Why didn’t the Clinton campaign go gang busters on Katie Johnson’s alleged rape? Because it’s dubious and uncertain.) https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation |