h1n1 vaxx. no side effects .. super funny...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:im sure the mom of the up till then super healthy little girl who was featued in the post today is laughing too.... or wait -- her daughter is dead.

And so you think that her PREGNANT (4 months now) mother who SMOKES had no effect on her daughter's lungs?

Being around second hand smoke is "super healthy."

WOW, a HUGE stretch. If you don't want to vax, then don't, but realize that while rare, you are knowingly putting your child to be THIS risky case.

a huge stretch?

They're living in a trailer, not a McMansion. And then being 4 months pregnant . . . She's NOT affecting development of her unborn child? Smokers deliver preemies.

[Anonymous]

yah.. and also.. isn't it amazing that most people who die from h1n1 do die at the hospitals? they go there to get help but maybe it is the cure that is worse then the disease? since the flu is not so well known then it is possible that they are being treated in very experimental way and die in the process? who knows what would happen if those people would not be ' treated"? amazingly enough every time there is report of new death from h1n1 the little has been said of an actual treatment. and again.. if they knew how to treat it would it be so many deaths?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:yah.. and also.. isn't it amazing that most people who die from h1n1 do die at the hospitals? they go there to get help but maybe it is the cure that is worse then the disease? since the flu is not so well known then it is possible that they are being treated in very experimental way and die in the process? who knows what would happen if those people would not be ' treated"? amazingly enough every time there is report of new death from h1n1 the little has been said of an actual treatment. and again.. if they knew how to treat it would it be so many deaths?

Wait, WHAT? Ok, I think we should all pitch in to send you a big pile of tin foil hats. You're really suggesting that people with severe respiratory illness should just.. stay home? Its somewhere between 11-15% of those hospitalized who are going on to die. Think you could save more than 85% in your own home? Without respirators, or ECMO, or antivirals, or steroids?

Yes, many are a "wait and see" type case... but often that waiting is done on respirators. You sound absolutely nutty in this post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:im sure the mom of the up till then super healthy little girl who was featued in the post today is laughing too.... or wait -- her daughter is dead.

Can you post a link? I dont get the paper...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/20/AR2009112002734.html?hpid=newswell

My god, that is horrible. Thank you for sharing that story. I hope it pushes some people to get the vax.

Too bad Heaven won't live to be 65 and find out what horrible side effects a swine flu vaccine would have had on her (sarcastic).

[Anonymous]

There is nothing funny about the swine flu, OP.
http://www.usatoday.com/video/index.htm?bctid=52354244001#/News/High%20risk%20patient%20died%20waiting%20for%20the%20H1N1%20vaccine/42804638001/40264770001/52354244001

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is nothing funny about the swine flu, OP.
http://www.usatoday.com/video/index.htm?bctid=52354244001#/News/High%20risk%20patient%20died%20waiting%20for%20the%20H1N1%20vaccine/42804638001/40264770001/52354244001

OMG how awful. My heart goes out to those parents...