"mid-6 figure" means what? ~150K or ~500K??

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If I can be allowed to be candid and earnest here, I think I do understand the confusion. Though I agree with PPs that the logical answer is low (1-3), mid (4-6), and high (7-9), I think I understand why people sometimes confuse this and say 150k is mid-6 figures.

The reason is that this phrase (mid-6 figures) is tied up with salary. And most ordinary people don't really comprehend possibilities of 700k salaries. For many ordinary people (not DCUM land), hitting 100k salary is a major milestone -- something they look to achieve and perhaps a benchmark of "success." When they hit that mark, they have hit a 6-figure income, and "made it."

But, they don't see that 100k as part of number line that goes up to 1M. They see it, maybe, as a number line going up to 200k at the absolute highest imaginable. Thus, "mid-6 figure" morphs into a confusing phrase they intend to convey -- midway between 100k and 200k.

But, again, I agree with PPs that this usage is erroneous and confusing.


I think you are right.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If I can be allowed to be candid and earnest here, I think I do understand the confusion. Though I agree with PPs that the logical answer is low (1-3), mid (4-6), and high (7-9), I think I understand why people sometimes confuse this and say 150k is mid-6 figures.

The reason is that this phrase (mid-6 figures) is tied up with salary. And most ordinary people don't really comprehend possibilities of 700k salaries. For many ordinary people (not DCUM land), hitting 100k salary is a major milestone -- something they look to achieve and perhaps a benchmark of "success." When they hit that mark, they have hit a 6-figure income, and "made it."

But, they don't see that 100k as part of number line that goes up to 1M. They see it, maybe, as a number line going up to 200k at the absolute highest imaginable. Thus, "mid-6 figure" morphs into a confusing phrase they intend to convey -- midway between 100k and 200k.

But, again, I agree with PPs that this usage is erroneous and confusing.


I think you are right.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If I can be allowed to be candid and earnest here, I think I do understand the confusion. Though I agree with PPs that the logical answer is low (1-3), mid (4-6), and high (7-9), I think I understand why people sometimes confuse this and say 150k is mid-6 figures.

The reason is that this phrase (mid-6 figures) is tied up with salary. And most ordinary people don't really comprehend possibilities of 700k salaries. For many ordinary people (not DCUM land), hitting 100k salary is a major milestone -- something they look to achieve and perhaps a benchmark of "success." When they hit that mark, they have hit a 6-figure income, and "made it."

But, they don't see that 100k as part of number line that goes up to 1M. They see it, maybe, as a number line going up to 200k at the absolute highest imaginable. Thus, "mid-6 figure" morphs into a confusing phrase they intend to convey -- midway between 100k and 200k.

But, again, I agree with PPs that this usage is erroneous and confusing.


Yep. They aren't doing the exponential math and think "mid-5s" was 50k, so "mid-6s" is 50k above the beginning of 6 figures. Also agree that for many saying that, so DCUM HHIs are unfathomable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If I can be allowed to be candid and earnest here, I think I do understand the confusion. Though I agree with PPs that the logical answer is low (1-3), mid (4-6), and high (7-9), I think I understand why people sometimes confuse this and say 150k is mid-6 figures.

The reason is that this phrase (mid-6 figures) is tied up with salary. And most ordinary people don't really comprehend possibilities of 700k salaries. For many ordinary people (not DCUM land), hitting 100k salary is a major milestone -- something they look to achieve and perhaps a benchmark of "success." When they hit that mark, they have hit a 6-figure income, and "made it."

But, they don't see that 100k as part of number line that goes up to 1M. They see it, maybe, as a number line going up to 200k at the absolute highest imaginable. Thus, "mid-6 figure" morphs into a confusing phrase they intend to convey -- midway between 100k and 200k.

But, again, I agree with PPs that this usage is erroneous and confusing.


SIL was talking about 6 figures. I said that's a wide range-what do you mean by 6 figures? For SIL it was over 100. 150 was mid. Over 200 was rich. Obviously Clinton thinks families are rich at 110 and 125. ACA has rich at 200/250.

Meanwhile SIL [doesn't live in the dmv] has a house that she might sell or do home improvements etc. Absolute shock at home prices for a comp house in DC or Arlington. NOVA complains that it is supporting the state. People in higher cola areas support the country via MAGHI tax points.
Anonymous
ex-NY state senator Hilary Clinton and the 110 and 125k college? A cop and a teacher married and living in Queens wouldn't get he benefit.
Anonymous
Mid six figures cannot mean 150k. It means the middle range of the six figure numbers. Can't help it your SIL can't count.

400-600kish.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:seems pretty straightforward. something that is "six-figures" means a six digit number. the six-digit number can start with anything from 1-9 so dividing it evenly into 3 groups (1-3 = low, 4-6 = mid, and 7-9 = high) yields:

Low = $100,00 - $399,999
Mid = $400,000 - 699,999
High = $700,000 - $999,999

What's the confusion?


I know, seems pretty obvious. But the great majority of people never earn that kind of money, so their disbelief trumps their logic.
Anonymous
I had someone do this to me once.

He works in the financial industry and said he made in the "mid 6 figures" and was interested in moving to my company.

When I explained that virtually no one in my company makes that kind of money because it's not the finance industry, he got very confused. It became clear that he meant $150k-ish.
Anonymous
This is an interesting discussion. I think the PP is right about why people think $150 is mid-six figures. It's difficult to imagine a salary of $500,000.

post reply Forum Index » Money and Finances
Message Quick Reply
Go to: