More crime… when will the attacks stop? Everyday - on metro, everywhere same type of attacks -

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And DC has that extra special problem of having federal prosecutors who are not accountable to DC citizens, and these prosecutors keep dropping the ball and keep putting violent criminals back out on the street.


As between the federal prosecutors and the elected attorney general and elected city council, it seems to me that it's the elected officials who are pro-crime.

The voters in this city are simply uninterested in getting tough on crime. The advocacy and political influence on behalf of criminals far outweighs that on behalf of victims.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And DC has that extra special problem of having federal prosecutors who are not accountable to DC citizens, and these prosecutors keep dropping the ball and keep putting violent criminals back out on the street.


As between the federal prosecutors and the elected attorney general and elected city council, it seems to me that it's the elected officials who are pro-crime.

The voters in this city are simply uninterested in getting tough on crime. The advocacy and political influence on behalf of criminals far outweighs that on behalf of victims.


True.

But this is changing. Thank the Lord for new blood coming in.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:i can't imagine why anyone would be on the street at 17th and I at 2 in the morning on Saturday.


Really? Nightlife! Clubs and bars. Did you never go out?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:i can't imagine why anyone would be on the street at 17th and I at 2 in the morning on Saturday.

That comes perilously close to blaming the victim. I can't believe that there are so many apologists for violent crime here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Violent crime is actually on a decades long decline. Media loves to sensationalize and that leads to the perception that it is growing.


Except for this year and last.



You can always move


Are you so out of touch with reality? Violent crime, in the last couple years, has increased through out the country, not just the DC area.


Hmmm, why would that be....why, why, why.....
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And DC has that extra special problem of having federal prosecutors who are not accountable to DC citizens, and these prosecutors keep dropping the ball and keep putting violent criminals back out on the street.


As between the federal prosecutors and the elected attorney general and elected city council, it seems to me that it's the elected officials who are pro-crime.

The voters in this city are simply uninterested in getting tough on crime. The advocacy and political influence on behalf of criminals far outweighs that on behalf of victims.


As has been oft' pointed out, in Iowa the politicians pander to the farm bloc. DC politicians pander to the cell block.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Violent crime is actually on a decades long decline. Media loves to sensationalize and that leads to the perception that it is growing.


Except for this year and last.



You can always move


Are you so out of touch with reality? Violent crime, in the last couple years, has increased through out the country, not just the DC area.


Hmmm, why would that be....why, why, why.....


It's NOT the Ferguson effect, as the White House and the NYT tell us every time the FBI dares to point out the obvious.

Must be the drought in California. Or the Zika virus.
Anonymous
Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?


Twitter. It's all about Twitter now.

Snapchat doesn't hep either.

But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?


Twitter. It's all about Twitter now.

Snapchat doesn't hep either.

But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety.


Sorry if their civil rights are preventing you from delivering the beatings you think black people require.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?


Twitter. It's all about Twitter now.

Snapchat doesn't hep either.

But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety.


Sorry if their civil rights are preventing you from delivering the beatings you think black people require.


There's an old saying: If you don't do the crime, you won't do the time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?


Twitter. It's all about Twitter now.

Snapchat doesn't hep either.

But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety.


Sorry if their civil rights are preventing you from delivering the beatings you think black people require.


There's an old saying: If you don't do the crime, you won't do the time.


+1. Very wise.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?


Twitter. It's all about Twitter now.

Snapchat doesn't hep either.

But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety.


Sorry if their civil rights are preventing you from delivering the beatings you think black people require.


There's an old saying: If you don't do the crime, you won't do the time.


Except when you're wrongfully arrested and convicted with fabricated evidence or shot in the back.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Violent crime is actually on a decades long decline. Media loves to sensationalize and that leads to the perception that it is growing.


Except for this year and last.



You can always move


Are you so out of touch with reality? Violent crime, in the last couple years, has increased through out the country, not just the DC area.


Hmmm, why would that be....why, why, why.....


It's NOT the Ferguson effect, as the White House and the NYT tell us every time the FBI dares to point out the obvious.

Must be the drought in California. Or the Zika virus.


Facts matter.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/preliminary-semiannual-uniform-crime-report-januaryjune-2015/tables/table-3

Don't you need to go pick up your spiffy white robe and pointy hat from the cleaners?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Violent crime is actually on a decades long decline. Media loves to sensationalize and that leads to the perception that it is growing.


Except for this year and last.



You can always move


Are you so out of touch with reality? Violent crime, in the last couple years, has increased through out the country, not just the DC area.


Hmmm, why would that be....why, why, why.....


It's NOT the Ferguson effect, as the White House and the NYT tell us every time the FBI dares to point out the obvious.

Must be the drought in California. Or the Zika virus.


Facts matter.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/preliminary-semiannual-uniform-crime-report-januaryjune-2015/tables/table-3

Don't you need to go pick up your spiffy white robe and pointy hat from the cleaners?


Uh, the table you linked shows sharp increases in violent crime from 2014 to 2015 after several years of decline.

Let's make a deal: the previous poster will pick his Klan outfit up from the cleaners (wow, good one, original) when you stop eating rubber cement while you post
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: