As between the federal prosecutors and the elected attorney general and elected city council, it seems to me that it's the elected officials who are pro-crime. The voters in this city are simply uninterested in getting tough on crime. The advocacy and political influence on behalf of criminals far outweighs that on behalf of victims. |
True. But this is changing. Thank the Lord for new blood coming in. |
Really? Nightlife! Clubs and bars. Did you never go out? |
That comes perilously close to blaming the victim. I can't believe that there are so many apologists for violent crime here. |
Hmmm, why would that be....why, why, why..... |
As has been oft' pointed out, in Iowa the politicians pander to the farm bloc. DC politicians pander to the cell block. |
It's NOT the Ferguson effect, as the White House and the NYT tell us every time the FBI dares to point out the obvious. Must be the drought in California. Or the Zika virus. |
| Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already? |
Twitter. It's all about Twitter now. Snapchat doesn't hep either. But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety. |
Sorry if their civil rights are preventing you from delivering the beatings you think black people require. |
There's an old saying: If you don't do the crime, you won't do the time. |
+1. Very wise. |
Except when you're wrongfully arrested and convicted with fabricated evidence or shot in the back. |
Facts matter. https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/preliminary-semiannual-uniform-crime-report-januaryjune-2015/tables/table-3 Don't you need to go pick up your spiffy white robe and pointy hat from the cleaners? |
Uh, the table you linked shows sharp increases in violent crime from 2014 to 2015 after several years of decline. Let's make a deal: the previous poster will pick his Klan outfit up from the cleaners (wow, good one, original) when you stop eating rubber cement while you post |