Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Fred Armisen - discuss

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I notice how different they are? Yes. Ginsburg- awesome. Armisen- Scientologist that drove away at least his second wife by being so into Scientology.

I think she was the scientologist, not him.

Agreed. She is a Scientologist.

No I don't think Ginsburg is.

Armisen isn't either but his (ex)wife Elizabeth Moss is and that drove a wedge between them.

I am a PP. Of course Ruth Bader Ginsburg IS NOT a Scientologist. Armisen is, so much that Moss divorced him. She talked about it, I just can't remember where!

[Anonymous]

I don't think that's right. Moss talked about how horrible the marriage was and acknowledged she is a Scientologist but has refused to talk further about it. Armisen has never claimed to be a Scientologist, nor is it alleged that he was one. It's been reported many times that her adherence to Scientology drove them apart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I notice how different they are? Yes. Ginsburg- awesome. Armisen- Scientologist that drove away at least his second wife by being so into Scientology.

I think she was the scientologist, not him.

Agreed. She is a Scientologist.

No I don't think Ginsburg is.

Armisen isn't either but his (ex)wife Elizabeth Moss is and that drove a wedge between them.

I am a PP. Of course Ruth Bader Ginsburg IS NOT a Scientologist. Armisen is, so much that Moss divorced him. She talked about it, I just can't remember where!

No. Elizabeth Moss is Scientologist and she couldn't get him to convert. That is why she divorced him. Google is your friend.

http://www.themortonreport.com/celebrity/hollywood/did-scientology-ruin-fred-armisens-marriage-to-elizabeth-moss/
What is a big deal is that Elizabeth is a Scientologist and Fred is not, and there have been reports that this was a the crux of their split. Us Weekly reported, "Her religion was as important to her as their marriage, if not more. He could not get with it."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I notice how different they are? Yes. Ginsburg- awesome. Armisen- Scientologist that drove away at least his second wife by being so into Scientology.

I think she was the scientologist, not him.

Agreed. She is a Scientologist.

No I don't think Ginsburg is.

Armisen isn't either but his (ex)wife Elizabeth Moss is and that drove a wedge between them.

I am a PP. Of course Ruth Bader Ginsburg IS NOT a Scientologist. Armisen is, so much that Moss divorced him. She talked about it, I just can't remember where!

No. Elizabeth Moss is Scientologist and she couldn't get him to convert. That is why she divorced him. Google is your friend.

http://www.themortonreport.com/celebrity/hollywood/did-scientology-ruin-fred-armisens-marriage-to-elizabeth-moss/
What is a big deal is that Elizabeth is a Scientologist and Fred is not, and there have been reports that this was a the crux of their split. Us Weekly reported, "Her religion was as important to her as their marriage, if not more. He could not get with it."

I'm a PP. What I heard her say is that he was too much of a Scientologist, and she couldn't support it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I notice how different they are? Yes. Ginsburg- awesome. Armisen- Scientologist that drove away at least his second wife by being so into Scientology.

I think she was the scientologist, not him.

Agreed. She is a Scientologist.

No I don't think Ginsburg is.

Armisen isn't either but his (ex)wife Elizabeth Moss is and that drove a wedge between them.

I am a PP. Of course Ruth Bader Ginsburg IS NOT a Scientologist. Armisen is, so much that Moss divorced him. She talked about it, I just can't remember where!

No. Elizabeth Moss is Scientologist and she couldn't get him to convert. That is why she divorced him. Google is your friend.

http://www.themortonreport.com/celebrity/hollywood/did-scientology-ruin-fred-armisens-marriage-to-elizabeth-moss/
What is a big deal is that Elizabeth is a Scientologist and Fred is not, and there have been reports that this was a the crux of their split. Us Weekly reported, "Her religion was as important to her as their marriage, if not more. He could not get with it."

I'm a PP. What I heard her say is that he was too much of a Scientologist, and she couldn't support it.

She is a hardcore Scientologist. I think you misheard. He isn't a Scientologist.

http://tonyortega.org/2014/03/10/mad-men-actress-elisabeth-mosss-record-in-scientology-is-actually-easy-to-obtain/
We’ll choose just one example. One of Scientology’s own magazines announced that Moss had completed a course called “Expanded Grade III” in 1999.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I notice how different they are? Yes. Ginsburg- awesome. Armisen- Scientologist that drove away at least his second wife by being so into Scientology.

I think she was the scientologist, not him.

Agreed. She is a Scientologist.

No I don't think Ginsburg is.

Armisen isn't either but his (ex)wife Elizabeth Moss is and that drove a wedge between them.

I am a PP. Of course Ruth Bader Ginsburg IS NOT a Scientologist. Armisen is, so much that Moss divorced him. She talked about it, I just can't remember where!

No. Elizabeth Moss is Scientologist and she couldn't get him to convert. That is why she divorced him. Google is your friend.

http://www.themortonreport.com/celebrity/hollywood/did-scientology-ruin-fred-armisens-marriage-to-elizabeth-moss/
What is a big deal is that Elizabeth is a Scientologist and Fred is not, and there have been reports that this was a the crux of their split. Us Weekly reported, "Her religion was as important to her as their marriage, if not more. He could not get with it."

I'm a PP. What I heard her say is that he was too much of a Scientologist, and she couldn't support it.

She is a hardcore Scientologist. I think you misheard. He isn't a Scientologist.

http://tonyortega.org/2014/03/10/mad-men-actress-elisabeth-mosss-record-in-scientology-is-actually-easy-to-obtain/
We’ll choose just one example. One of Scientology’s own magazines announced that Moss had completed a course called “Expanded Grade III” in 1999.

I heard someone ask her, and she confirmed it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I notice how different they are? Yes. Ginsburg- awesome. Armisen- Scientologist that drove away at least his second wife by being so into Scientology.

I think she was the scientologist, not him.

Agreed. She is a Scientologist.

No I don't think Ginsburg is.

Armisen isn't either but his (ex)wife Elizabeth Moss is and that drove a wedge between them.

I am a PP. Of course Ruth Bader Ginsburg IS NOT a Scientologist. Armisen is, so much that Moss divorced him. She talked about it, I just can't remember where!

No. Elizabeth Moss is Scientologist and she couldn't get him to convert. That is why she divorced him. Google is your friend.

http://www.themortonreport.com/celebrity/hollywood/did-scientology-ruin-fred-armisens-marriage-to-elizabeth-moss/
What is a big deal is that Elizabeth is a Scientologist and Fred is not, and there have been reports that this was a the crux of their split. Us Weekly reported, "Her religion was as important to her as their marriage, if not more. He could not get with it."

I'm a PP. What I heard her say is that he was too much of a Scientologist, and she couldn't support it.

She is a hardcore Scientologist. I think you misheard. He isn't a Scientologist.

http://tonyortega.org/2014/03/10/mad-men-actress-elisabeth-mosss-record-in-scientology-is-actually-easy-to-obtain/
We’ll choose just one example. One of Scientology’s own magazines announced that Moss had completed a course called “Expanded Grade III” in 1999.

I heard someone ask her, and she confirmed it.

Mad Men's Elisabeth Moss praises Scientology for making her 'better'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2338480/Mad-Mens-Elisabeth-Moss-praises-Scientology-making-better.html#ixzz48sjeOa3S
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I notice how different they are? Yes. Ginsburg- awesome. Armisen- Scientologist that drove away at least his second wife by being so into Scientology.

I think she was the scientologist, not him.

Agreed. She is a Scientologist.

No I don't think Ginsburg is.

Armisen isn't either but his (ex)wife Elizabeth Moss is and that drove a wedge between them.

I am a PP. Of course Ruth Bader Ginsburg IS NOT a Scientologist. Armisen is, so much that Moss divorced him. She talked about it, I just can't remember where!

No. Elizabeth Moss is Scientologist and she couldn't get him to convert. That is why she divorced him. Google is your friend.

http://www.themortonreport.com/celebrity/hollywood/did-scientology-ruin-fred-armisens-marriage-to-elizabeth-moss/
What is a big deal is that Elizabeth is a Scientologist and Fred is not, and there have been reports that this was a the crux of their split. Us Weekly reported, "Her religion was as important to her as their marriage, if not more. He could not get with it."

I'm a PP. What I heard her say is that he was too much of a Scientologist, and she couldn't support it.

She is a hardcore Scientologist. I think you misheard. He isn't a Scientologist.

http://tonyortega.org/2014/03/10/mad-men-actress-elisabeth-mosss-record-in-scientology-is-actually-easy-to-obtain/
We’ll choose just one example. One of Scientology’s own magazines announced that Moss had completed a course called “Expanded Grade III” in 1999.

I heard someone ask her, and she confirmed it.

Source?

[Anonymous]

I'm PP. It doesn't matter. Believe what you want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm PP. It doesn't matter. Believe what you want.

So we take your word for it over actual sources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm PP. It doesn't matter. Believe what you want.

Yea, whatever she was raised in Scientology.

Armisen may be a jackass but there is not a shred of evidence he is a Scientologist and all media on their divorce is about her filing because he wouldn't convert.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I notice how different they are? Yes. Ginsburg- awesome. Armisen- Scientologist that drove away at least his second wife by being so into Scientology.

I think she was the scientologist, not him.

Agreed. She is a Scientologist.

No I don't think Ginsburg is.

Armisen isn't either but his (ex)wife Elizabeth Moss is and that drove a wedge between them.

I am a PP. Of course Ruth Bader Ginsburg IS NOT a Scientologist. Armisen is, so much that Moss divorced him. She talked about it, I just can't remember where!

No. Elizabeth Moss is Scientologist and she couldn't get him to convert. That is why she divorced him. Google is your friend.

http://www.themortonreport.com/celebrity/hollywood/did-scientology-ruin-fred-armisens-marriage-to-elizabeth-moss/
What is a big deal is that Elizabeth is a Scientologist and Fred is not, and there have been reports that this was a the crux of their split. Us Weekly reported, "Her religion was as important to her as their marriage, if not more. He could not get with it."

I'm a PP. What I heard her say is that he was too much of a Scientologist, and she couldn't support it.

Saying over and over again that "you heard it somewhere" doesn't magically make it true.

He is not, and has never been, a Scientologist. So it would be pretty odd if Moss said that he was "too much of a Scientologist", don't you think? If you are able to provide a source other than your own imagination, please feel free to do so.

[Anonymous]

I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHAT DISCUSSION WE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE CONCERNING GINSBURG AND ARMISEN.

Please OP, don't leave us hanging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHAT DISCUSSION WE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE CONCERNING GINSBURG AND ARMISEN.

Please OP, don't leave us hanging.

I assume OP thinks they resemble each other? I don't think they do...definitely not enough to start a thread about it, anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHAT DISCUSSION WE ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE CONCERNING GINSBURG AND ARMISEN.

Please OP, don't leave us hanging.

I assume OP thinks they resemble each other? I don't think they do...definitely not enough to start a thread about it, anyway.

Yea, no.

Did he recently portray her in a skit?