Didn't the ACT ceiling used to be 35? |
| OP - go to bigfuture.com - you can find the data you are interested in. |
Easier actually; they re-normed in 1989; basically add two points to your 1986 score to match current scores. |
thank you! Will do! |
| One of my kids had a 31. It's pretty middling to low for competitive schools. DC got into SLACs ranked in the 25-50 range, which were good fits for DC. |
96%..."its a good score" but not a "great" score......right. |
You don't believe me? Read @21:31. |
cool!
|
I got a 35 in about 1992 so I guess that means now I'd get...a 37? (Kidding.) |
Not in the early 90s or thereafter. I can't speak to any time before that. |
| It's a lot better than my DD's 23 |
NP. It is a good score but not great. Truly. Not being snobby. This is based on personal experience with college applications in the past year. 33 and up are great scores. |
+1. My child received 34s on everything, including writing, and a perfect 36 on Science but still was deferred by her top choice Ivy. |
| This score is great but every competitive program will still be hard to get into. At my daughter's state college there were 8,000 applications for 200 spots in one engineering section. This score isn't even close. Make sure you know what your kid wants and how to get it. There are lots of people out there all trying to get the same thing. It's gotten to be a nightmare for colleges and the students. |
Well, since 1992 is AFTER 1989, add 0 points to your score so now you would get .... a 35 ? |