Problem with uncircumcised boy...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:955 here. I am not saying get circumcised. I am saying, go to the doctor and make sure you follow up on it. Doctors did all kinds of test, no infection, we tried medicine and even a small procedure at doctors office to open the hole but nothing worked. Like PP said a cream might help, but in our case the skin was so tight that my son could not pee. He would avoid going to the bathroom. We tried different things but it did not help. Circumcision was our last option.
It took 3 days off school and a week to heal and be back to normal.It was painful for first 2 days :o( even with all the painkillers.

You do realize it's painful for days regardless of age. Right? Newborns just process and express it differently. It's also much more disgusting to have an open wound covered in feces and urine.

They make an invention called gauze, I know it's hard for you anti circ Neanderthals to keep up with new medical and technological break throughs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of the many reasons my boys were circumcised after birth.

Just like the anti-vacc crazies, the anti-circ crazies never mention the numerous disadvantages.

There are some pretty major disadvantages to circumcising, too. Cutting off half of the penile skin, including the most sensitive part of the penis comes to mind. Subjecting your child to an unnecessary surgery that he cannot consent to, as well. Risking infection, improper healing, a botched surgery that can cause pain and dysfunction...

Meanwhile, the other option is to leave your son's penis as is. I personally have handled more than my share of uncircumcised dicks, and have never witnessed any hygiene issues (that could be attributed to the foreskin, at least...) STD's, infection, and cancer are risks whether you/your partner has a foreskin or not - to me, the benefits of opting to stay intact far outweigh potential benefits of circing. And really, if humans weren't meant to have foreskins, evolution would have taken care of it a long time ago. (And for all you creationists out there, if men weren't meant to have foreskins god wouldn't have put them there, I suppose!)

I just can't buy the "but it's cleanerrrr! and also STD's!" argument. Teach your kid to clean his business and don't stick it anywhere without protection, foreskin or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They make an invention called gauze, I know it's hard for you anti circ Neanderthals to keep up with new medical and technological break throughs.

You must not have a penis. You don't know what the hell you're talking about. You genital mutilators are the neanderthals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the many reasons my boys were circumcised after birth.

Just like the anti-vacc crazies, the anti-circ crazies never mention the numerous disadvantages.

There are some pretty major disadvantages to circumcising, too. Cutting off half of the penile skin, including the most sensitive part of the penis comes to mind. Subjecting your child to an unnecessary surgery that he cannot consent to, as well. Risking infection, improper healing, a botched surgery that can cause pain and dysfunction...

Cutting half the skin? It is a flap of skin, and the foreskin is not sensitive. You can argue that having the head exposed reduced sensitivity...I do not know the answer. Having had multiple major surgeries, circumcision is not really surgery....you are removing a bit of loose skin. You are not cutting into flesh.

I am circumcised -- religious reasons. If I had a boy, they would be circumcised.

The reason why the Torah mandates circumcision is probably hygienic -- if you look at most of the rules in the Torah, they make sense from a sanitary perspective 2500 years ago.

Circumcision is more sanitary...It of course is possible to clean the penis such that it is just as clean, but any time you have moist skin covering other moist skin, you can have various infections: bacterial, fungal, and yeast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They make an invention called gauze, I know it's hard for you anti circ Neanderthals to keep up with new medical and technological break throughs.

You must not have a penis. You don't know what the hell you're talking about. You genital mutilators are the neanderthals.

Yes because the Neanderthals had the precise tools to excise a piece of skin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh please. There's no reason to assume the boy needs to be circumsized. Please go troll somewhere else.

You're a little sensitive. Circ is recommended for some conditions. If a tight foreskin doesn't respond to other treatment, it may need to be circ'd.

No one is saying that everyone needs to be circ'd. No one is saying that babies should be circ'd.

Some guys need it, though. it's a medical procedure. Get over it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Second vote for a doctor visit. Keeping it clean and putting a little cream on it should do the trick. Circumcision is kind of drastic. We don't hack our ladybits off when we get yeast infections.

Not the same thing at all

It's really not the same thing. It's more like removing the clitoral hood. By the way, some people have the clitoral hood removed because they get adhesions between the clitoris and the hood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh please. There's no reason to assume the boy needs to be circumsized. Please go troll somewhere else.

You're a little sensitive. Circ is recommended for some conditions. If a tight foreskin doesn't respond to other treatment, it may need to be circ'd.

No one is saying that everyone needs to be circ'd. No one is saying that babies should be circ'd.

Some guys need it, though. it's a medical procedure. Get over it.

There's nothing for me to 'get over' nor am I sensitive. If you'd read my post, you'd see that I never said there was never any reason to circumsize. I said the poster I was no reason to assume that the OP's son needed to be circumsized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh please. There's no reason to assume the boy needs to be circumsized. Please go troll somewhere else.

Sorry just providing information first hand...

Don't apologize to the anti-circ lunatic.

[Anonymous]

We are in the same boat as OP. Had to go to Ped a few times because it was swollen and painful. Put some cream on, and it was fine in a few days. I'd rather do that several times in his childhood than subject him to a surgical procedure. It may be just cutting off a piece of skin, but it's still surgical. And I just can't subject my kid to unnecessary surgery for something that is not life threatening or will drastically improve quality of life. He can make that decision for himself when he's older.

[Anonymous]

Oh, there was an OP? I thought we were just trying to see who could call the other side "Neanderthals" the most.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh please. There's no reason to assume the boy needs to be circumsized. Please go troll somewhere else.

Sorry just providing information first hand...

Don't apologize to the anti-circ lunatic.

Yes, name calling will definitely help you win your argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:955 here. I am not saying get circumcised. I am saying, go to the doctor and make sure you follow up on it. Doctors did all kinds of test, no infection, we tried medicine and even a small procedure at doctors office to open the hole but nothing worked. Like PP said a cream might help, but in our case the skin was so tight that my son could not pee. He would avoid going to the bathroom. We tried different things but it did not help. Circumcision was our last option.
It took 3 days off school and a week to heal and be back to normal.It was painful for first 2 days :o( even with all the painkillers.

You do realize it's painful for days regardless of age. Right? Newborns just process and express it differently. It's also much more disgusting to have an open wound covered in feces and urine.

That would be gross but that is not what happens with a newborn. Basically, after they are circumcised you put a little petroleum jelly around the red mark, lay a gauze pad over it and diaper as usual. Repeat with each diaper change. Mine didn't seem especially bothered by it at all. And newborns sleep a lot...they really aren't aware of it.

[Anonymous]

some people are really opinionated about this!

My DH needed to be circumcised in his late teens (foreskin simply too tight).

But that didn't mean he said our son should be circumcised at birth (we chose not too). So it couldn't have been too traumatic to have it done at an older age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:some people are really opinionated about this!

My DH needed to be circumcised in his late teens (foreskin simply too tight).

But that didn't mean he said our son should be circumcised at birth (we chose not too). So it couldn't have been too traumatic to have it done at an older age.

I can't imagine any guy in his teens wants to go get his dick snipped. The ones done as newborns have no memory at least--and infant skin heals much, much quicker.