actually, yes. Wikipedia. . .You should be mindful that hazing falls on a spectrum |
Well, it goes to show you that there are 2 perspectives on this hazing thing. IMO, I would not consider not allowing the 6th graders to participate in sports, for example, as “hazing.” However, I could see a situation where hazing could occur if 6th graders were allowed. If only one 6th grader was good enough to make the team, how would that kid’s experience be playing with 15 7th and 8th graders? Seems to me that the potential for hazing would be much bigger in that scenario. Anyways, don’t most MCPS middle schools try to limit the 6th graders’ exposure to the older kids anyways? When my kids were in 6th grade, they had their own “hall” and even went in a different door than the older kids. I was told that the MCPS powers thought that type of separation decreased the odds of bullying.
As far as the DCs’ MCPS HS, only truly exceptional kids made varsity as freshmen in any sport….size, ability, extensive club team experience, etc. And the coach of the sport that my kids played would not put just one freshman on varsity. It was at least two or none. He said he put just one on his first year coaching and that kid was miserable – no age peers on the team, felt isolated, etc. |
Hazed???
You have watched way too many movies! I bet you think that the entire staff are all sleeping together too! |
But that same logic "let more kids play" would hold true to only allow 7th and 8th graders be in the school play but that isn't done. It is just a weird singling out in middle school sports. It doesn't keep me up at night but I just do not see the consistent logic. But I wouldn't use it in the context of hazing, just pointing it out. |
sorry I tell my students to AVOID any wiki entries. not credible |
OK. I guess that shut that down. You folks have been so helpful. Real modern thinkers. . . .Always, at least, good for a laugh to run things past the clear thinkers on DCUM. . .
Best! OP Checking back and signing off. . . Oh yeah, that above teacher needs some professional development in online communities of practice and when wiki is an acceptable source. . . |
At my son's MCPS middle school, the school play is no cut. Every kid who wants to participate gets a role, whether it's big or small or running the spotlight. So the "let more kids play" argument doesn't apply at all. |
no "professional development" necessary, moron If you want CREDIBLE information, you use subscription databases (Gale, SIRS, Questia, ProQuest). Greenwood is phenomenal, by the way. a little beyond your reach, PP, I think . . . And for credible tertiary information (from there you can find secondary and primary sources referenced), you can examine Britannica. And guess what? At MY school, some of the sources are even TRANSLATED into other languages! woo hoo! yeah - I need PD. |
We've established that the OP is crazy, but really? You'd go to all those sources to look up the definition of hazing? |
No. My DC went to a under-performing MS. DC was not minority, FARMS, ESOL, Sp Ed. No hazing took place. There were other discipline problems but not hazing. |
Hazed as new students yes. Kids at JW are thrown in lockers, tripped, backpacks kicked, made fun of etc... NOT. A fun year for kids. The school is just so darn crowded, teachers can not monitor. |
OP is not crazy 21:46, but I definitely see a bunch of bullies on this thread. It didn't take too long for me to figure out what OP meant. Sure, I would not have used the word hazing that way, but that doesn't mean the question is not legit To call the OP crazy is absurd. |
While I completely agree the sixth grade should be allowed to at least try out (because some certainly would make it and it is a ridiculous gap for athletes playing previously to stop for a year) , I can't wrap my head around the idea they are hazed and scarred for life because of it! My child is hardly terrified to walk the hallways because he doesn't play soccer at school!!
|