Benghazi

[Anonymous]

A dead Ambassador and 3 additional dead Americans is a non-issue??? Well, you definitely learn something new every day on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A dead Ambassador and 3 additional dead Americans is a non-issue??? Well, you definitely learn something new every day on DCUM.

Don't be dense. The poster means it is not a failure as a President to suffer an attack on a consulate.

It happened in 79, 83, 86, 87, 90, 98, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2008.

[Anonymous]

That consulate should have been closed due to the numerous priot attacks as a PP metions. Numerous requests for more security by Ambassador Hayes were denied. There was no marine protection.... Security was outsourced to LIBYANS in a HOT zone and on 9/11. There is so much wrong here I dont even know where to start. this is an absolute issue. True we have had other embassy attacks but nothing to this degree. This was a 7 hour attack and we had fighter planes within 1 hour from Benghazi. So much wrong... Changing stories, no ownership... Weak

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Romney is treasonous. He is given aid and comfort to the emenies of the US.


And you're clearly not giving aid and comfort to a dictionary....your true enemy...don't forget to vote on November 7th.


Given the incidences of Republican voter fraud (I'm looking at you, Arizona), this isn't funny. At all.


Easy Pip-Squeak, we're talking about more important things than that.

Such as:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/331125/first-aid-living-bing-west

"It is bewildering that no U.S. aircraft ever came to the aid of the defenders. If even one F18 had been on station, it would have detected the location of hostiles firing at night and deterred and attacked the mortar sites. For our top leadership, with all the technological and military tools at their disposal, to have done nothing for seven hours was a joint civilian and military failure of initiative and nerve."

Wow, what a total lack of understanding of military capabilities. Yes if only we had had one F18 on station in Iraq or Afghanistan in the past what is it 11 or 12 years, we would have "located, deterred, and attacked mortar sites. You should send the DOD an email.

[Anonymous]

This all started with Reagan and the killing of the marines in Beirut. As a Republican, he showed his true colors and ran.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Romney is treasonous. He is given aid and comfort to the emenies of the US.


And you're clearly not giving aid and comfort to a dictionary....your true enemy...don't forget to vote on November 7th.


Given the incidences of Republican voter fraud (I'm looking at you, Arizona), this isn't funny. At all.


Easy Pip-Squeak, we're talking about more important things than that.

Such as:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/331125/first-aid-living-bing-west

"It is bewildering that no U.S. aircraft ever came to the aid of the defenders. If even one F18 had been on station, it would have detected the location of hostiles firing at night and deterred and attacked the mortar sites. For our top leadership, with all the technological and military tools at their disposal, to have done nothing for seven hours was a joint civilian and military failure of initiative and nerve."

Wow, what a total lack of understanding of military capabilities. Yes if only we had had one F18 on station in Iraq or Afghanistan in the past what is it 11 or 12 years, we would have "located, deterred, and attacked mortar sites. You should send the DOD an email.

You'll probably want to look into the author's qualifications before making a remark as snide as that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A dead Ambassador and 3 additional dead Americans is a non-issue??? Well, you definitely learn something new every day on DCUM.

Don't be dense. The poster means it is not a failure as a President to suffer an attack on a consulate.

It happened in 79, 83, 86, 87, 90, 98, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2008.

OP here and yes, of course this is what I meant. Romney is the one who disregarded the dead by politicizing the issue before the bodies were even cold. He nauseates me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a registered Dem and 2008 Obama voter and would hardly call Benghazi a non-issue. It rightfully SHOULD be an issue. The US should not have been blindsided, given our awareness of the growing presence of militias amidst a power vacuum, the attacks on the Red Cross, the IEDs previously lobbed at our consulate, and the attack on the British Embassy convoy. WTF went wrong with intelligence and State? The newest release of documents leaves me further dismayed and shaking my head in disbelief.

The same thing that always goes "wrong". We are not a nation of crazies and don't think like they do.

[Anonymous]

Benghazi is a non-issue. Overseas stationing for the armed forces and foreign service personnel is dangerous and sadly occasionally these American public servants are injured and killed. This happens to be the nature of these jobs. We dearly appreciate the sacrifices these American heroes make for us every day.

It is tragic anytime one of our American heroes is killed in the service of our nation, but it is not right to blame the President for these deaths.

In 1983 during the Reagan Administration, 243 Marines and Navy Corpsmen were killed in a terrorist attack in Beirut, Lebanon. This terror attack occurred only a week after the Commandant of the Marine Corps had visited the base and forbid the local commander from digging trenches and fortifying the base because it would give the appearance creating a permanent fortress. The guards at the base gates were forbidden from having their M-16 rifles loaded. This was all just six months after a truck bomb had detonated and killed about 75 people at the U.S. Embassy also in Beirut, Lebanon.

So although it is tragic that we lost four brave Americans in Benghazi recently, it is not the first time nor will it be the last time that Americans serving in foreign lands will make the ultimate sacrifice for their country.

Only simple minded uninformed people would hold President Obama personal responsible for the deaths of our brave Americans who were lost while serving our country in libya