How was the Einstein meeting tonight?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they confirm whether the plan for E-G is for the current SSIMS area to stay at SSIMS 2027-2030 while everyone else switches to the new boundaries in 2027?

I'm trying to understand this too. Under any plan option, my kid would be moving to Eastern in fall '27 (7th grade year). Are SSIMS kids just staying at SSIMS until the school closes now?

In Options E, F, and G, no one new moves to Eastern until 2030. Look at the Effects Tables to see the numbers across each year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they confirm whether the plan for E-G is for the current SSIMS area to stay at SSIMS 2027-2030 while everyone else switches to the new boundaries in 2027?

I'm trying to understand this too. Under any plan option, my kid would be moving to Eastern in fall '27 (7th grade year). Are SSIMS kids just staying at SSIMS until the school closes now?

In Options E, F, and G, no one new moves to Eastern until 2030. Look at the Effects Tables to see the numbers across each year.

Whoa, I think the effects tables changed. Pretty sure on Monday they showed zero kids at SSIMS starting in 2027. But you're right, now it shows kids there 2027-2030.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they confirm whether the plan for E-G is for the current SSIMS area to stay at SSIMS 2027-2030 while everyone else switches to the new boundaries in 2027?

I'm trying to understand this too. Under any plan option, my kid would be moving to Eastern in fall '27 (7th grade year). Are SSIMS kids just staying at SSIMS until the school closes now?

In Options E, F, and G, no one new moves to Eastern until 2030. Look at the Effects Tables to see the numbers across each year.

Whoa, I think the effects tables changed. Pretty sure on Monday they showed zero kids at SSIMS starting in 2027. But you're right, now it shows kids there 2027-2030.

It was originally shown to not have students starting in 2030, wants it??

[Anonymous]

^* wasn't it?

[Anonymous]

Note that in two of the new options, Rolling Terrace ES matriculates to Takoma Park MS, upon SSIMS' (proposed) closing.

[Anonymous]

What a mess. How do they plan to draw boundaries in this large district?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they confirm whether the plan for E-G is for the current SSIMS area to stay at SSIMS 2027-2030 while everyone else switches to the new boundaries in 2027?

I'm trying to understand this too. Under any plan option, my kid would be moving to Eastern in fall '27 (7th grade year). Are SSIMS kids just staying at SSIMS until the school closes now?

In Options E, F, and G, no one new moves to Eastern until 2030. Look at the Effects Tables to see the numbers across each year.

Whoa, I think the effects tables changed. Pretty sure on Monday they showed zero kids at SSIMS starting in 2027. But you're right, now it shows kids there 2027-2030.

It was originally shown to not have students starting in 2030, wants it??

No, I am like 90% sure that on the day it was released it showed no one at SSIMS starting 2027 (but had text saying SSIMS would close in 2030) and we were confused here what that meant.