2.1 Motion to Waive Provision Regarding Timing of Election of Officers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who did the public want to be President at VP?

There were honestly no great candidates, TBH. The BOE is full of duds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who did the public want to be President at VP?

There were honestly no great candidates, TBH. The BOE is full of duds.

The SMOB would probably do a great job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who did the public want to be President at VP?

There were honestly no great candidates, TBH. The BOE is full of duds.

The SMOB would probably do a great job.

Why? They never do anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I bet you could crack this nut by attending the meeting or reading the minutes.

There are no minutes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who did the public want to be President at VP?

There were honestly no great candidates, TBH. The BOE is full of duds.

The SMOB would probably do a great job.

I don't think the SMOB is eligible to be Board President or VP....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On tomorrow’s Board of Education Agenda is this item.

But there is no Resolution attached. Just the title. No transparency.

Anyone know why Julie Yang wants to mess with the Election of new Board of Education officers? President and VP?

She and Karyla have been an issue all along. This is nothing new. They are moving on so they don't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who did the public want to be President at VP?

There were honestly no great candidates, TBH. The BOE is full of duds.

The SMOB would probably do a great job.

I don't think the SMOB is eligible to be Board President or VP....

Correct. And the SMOB will be changing over the summer anyway when she graduates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who did the public want to be President at VP?

There were honestly no great candidates, TBH. The BOE is full of duds.

The SMOB would probably do a great job.

Yeah it wasn’t a serious suggestion, I just think she’d have more independence and common sense than most of the others.

I don't think the SMOB is eligible to be Board President or VP....

Correct. And the SMOB will be changing over the summer anyway when she graduates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet you could crack this nut by attending the meeting or reading the minutes.

That’s during or after the meeting. Your plan is to sit by and approve of Julie Yang and Thomas Taylor posting an Agenda without supporting documents so the public is kept in the dark about what is going on at today’s meeting and can’t comment.

You a fan of barefoot and pregnant or Taylor’s eat a banana philosophy?

Taylor and Yang love a good surprise, so I'm sure the vagueness is intentional.

You bet. BOE election of officers was supposed to be after Dec. 1st, so they did it today and elected new officers.
Surprise! Both votes were unanimous. The whole thing was planned behind closed doors and staged for cameras.

This is how everything goes. Not having a BOE wouldn't impact things and save money.