I disagree. I think there were always elite "finishing schools". I mean in the 1950's college was pretty much new for everyone. GI Bill etc. Was it really that much different than it is today? I kind of don't think it is. Boys study this Girls study that. It's mostly just social sorting. Boys that aren't from the upper middle class don't get much out of the deal. No job offers at wealth management firms, law offices, tech companies etc. Go home and show your family how smart you are, you'll make your mom proud sort of stuff only goes so far, until they ask when you'll start working. |
I have a boy and a girl, and they have the same reactions. My boy has even brought up inlisting because he wants to be a pilot. I really sacrificed to fund their 529 plans, and he can use the 529 plan money on his flight training as part of a degree. If he enlists, there is no guarantee that he will get to fly. I can't even believe we're having this conversation - I'm literally offering him a free 4-year degree with flight training anywhere he wants to go, dangling fun study abroad programs, etc, and he's acting like it's a waste of time. |
Point out that officers fly, there are far fewer enlisted pilots. Maybe he wants to apply to a military college or join ROTC. I would look for Air Force or Navy ROTC for someone wanting to be a pilot. |
| Most boys need more time to mature before college. It just takes them longer to be ready. |
We're pushing for better gender balance in all jobs, not just the high-paying ones? More men going into teaching and nursing, more women working as bricklayers and roofers. Right? |
Sorry, but this is a really ignorant comment. A tiny fraction of rich girls went to "elite finishing schools" and the subject matter was not academic. But universities for boys were old and established long before the 1950s. Women born in 1950 or earlier largely did not go to college. Many families actively discouraged it and many schools in the 60s-70s limited enrollment or what classes you could take. Even in the 90s, women had trouble getting professor time, lab time, etc. It was very different from today. I don't know why you think anybody MC/LMC gets wealth management jobs, those are for people with money and connections. Deciding that the only good jobs are wealth management or tech might be part of the problem, though. I think at least some of these boys are responding to a very narrow idea if what career success looks like. |
So, you're claiming that academics prior to the 1950's were widespread amongst men but not women. Academia has almost always been for the wealthy. Nothing more than finishing clubs for the elite. They continue to be nominally useful for those that aren't well connected to begin with. Merely social sorting. |
|
Men traditionally have far better non-college options than women, including military/law enforcement, construction, trades, fire fighting, etc.
Traditional options for women without a college degree are things like being a nanny, working in a daycare, being a dental hygienist, cosmetology, cleaning, or retail. These all have less advancement potential and income than the traditional male options. It's not the only reason more women are motivated to go to college and more men opt out, but it is one contributing factor. |
Most jobs women get without a college degree pay less than the jobs men can get with just a high school diploma or GED. One of my brothers does security and gets paid six times what my sister makes in retail. The firm he works for has only hired one woman in ten years. They claim it is due to lack of interest, but really they make it clear that female applicants are not wanted. |
|
Are we not going to talk about how sexist the trades are and continue to be? Even though women are not only capable of doing the job but often perform it more safely? Or how dangerous it can be for a female plumber to be taking after hours jobs?
Yes, those jobs pay well. But with limited exceptions, they are not open to women. Still. In 2025. |