Locking threads

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

I don't get how you have time for this. Is this like a sports-type thing for you? Like, "oh no, they're trashing my girl on team red, I have to trash team blue now!!!"

What is going on with you?

Just calling out the utter hypocrisy. And now, of course, you’ll pretend you have no idea what I could possibly be talking about when no doubt you are one of the worst offenders when it comes to trashing Usha Vance.

No, I definitely understand what you're saying because I think Usha Vance dresses so boring she doesn't actually merit discussion. However, why is "justice for Usha" even your thing? Out of everything going on in the world, this is what strikes you as important? Really???

The level of vitriol directed at Usha Vance on the Trump women fashion thread is so over-the-top that it’s been called out and reported multiple times. You are correct that she never dresses in a way that merits discussion at all - she looks completely normal and appropriate.

However, there are certain posters who have made it their mission to call her “haggard, unkempt, sloppy” - when any observer can see she is none of those things. Not to mention all of the seriously inappropriate political posts about the Vances that have thankfully been deleted.

Now we have a fashion thread about Rama Duwaji in which any criticism about HER is met with utter disdain and hostility by the very same people who make it their mission to tear Usha Vance apart - for NO reason. And who call anyone who defends her “friends and family,” or Usha herself.

So forgive me if I find all of this beyond annoying and hypocritical.

But what if people genuinely find Usha haggard, unkempt, and sloppy? People are allowed to have opinions that aren't your opinion, you know that, right?

So if people genuinely find Rama Duwaji “haggard, unkempt, and sloppy,” you understand that they’re allowed those opinions too - right? I noticed someone posted something similar and those comments were deleted. So interesting.

There are still several comments of that nature on the thread. I deleted some that quoted an inappropriate post. If you want to go and make a negative comment on her fashion, you are free to do so. But, if you simply post about Usha again, it will be deleted.