She wouldn’t stop having babies.

[Anonymous]

The hate for this woman is pure misogyny. If freedom of choice means anything, it mean that the court system (particularly the criminal justice system) shouldn't be used to punish a woman because we don't like her reproductive choices. There's zero evidence she's an unfit parent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:13 kids used to be common enough.

The mother's stopped giving birth in their 40s, around menopause. My great-grandmother had 16, the last at 45, not 63. There is a difference.

+1 Our special ed classes and supports reflect the difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The hate for this woman is pure misogyny. If freedom of choice means anything, it mean that the court system (particularly the criminal justice system) shouldn't be used to punish a woman because we don't like her reproductive choices. There's zero evidence she's an unfit parent.

It's neither hate nor misogyny to recognize mental illness and identify it.

[Anonymous]

This is nightmare fuel! I hope she never sees the twins!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The hate for this woman is pure misogyny. If freedom of choice means anything, it mean that the court system (particularly the criminal justice system) shouldn't be used to punish a woman because we don't like her reproductive choices. There's zero evidence she's an unfit parent.

If she hadn't committed fraud, no one would have noticed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hate for this woman is pure misogyny. If freedom of choice means anything, it mean that the court system (particularly the criminal justice system) shouldn't be used to punish a woman because we don't like her reproductive choices. There's zero evidence she's an unfit parent.

It's neither hate nor misogyny to recognize mental illness and identify it.

What mental illness? I'll give you that she's eccentric, but what do you believe is the diagnosis? Being weird isn't a mental illness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is really crazy/horrifying! Legislation is so far behind the science. She’s not running a home, she’s running a kennel!

“MaryBeth Lewis had 13 kids, but she wanted more. Her desire to be a new mom again at 65 led to felony charges — and a custody battle like no other.”


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/02/magazine/marybeth-lewis-13-children-felony-charges.html

🦇💩🤪

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The hate for this woman is pure misogyny. If freedom of choice means anything, it mean that the court system (particularly the criminal justice system) shouldn't be used to punish a woman because we don't like her reproductive choices. There's zero evidence she's an unfit parent.

No one’s hating. Freedom of choice also means you can make bad choices, as this woman did. We can say she made bad choices.

[Anonymous]

Twins should have stayed with the foster parents so sad

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hate for this woman is pure misogyny. If freedom of choice means anything, it mean that the court system (particularly the criminal justice system) shouldn't be used to punish a woman because we don't like her reproductive choices. There's zero evidence she's an unfit parent.

No one’s hating. Freedom of choice also means you can make bad choices, as this woman did. We can say she made bad choices.

Agreed. I don't think she should be in a legal mess, but that doesn't mean I think society should condone her choices. Those are different things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Twins should have stayed with the foster parents so sad

Absolutely not. Children belong with their parents, not the highest bidder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twins should have stayed with the foster parents so sad

Absolutely not. Children belong with their parents, not the highest bidder.

How are they their parents? No genetic connection and the dad didn’t even want them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twins should have stayed with the foster parents so sad

Absolutely not. Children belong with their parents, not the highest bidder.

How are they their parents? No genetic connection and the dad didn’t even want them.

They’re raising their biological siblings. These two children have been deprived of any relationship with their biological siblings for their entire lives because some backwater judge got the ick about an older woman having kids. Think about that for a minute.

[Anonymous]

Solomon’s baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:13 kids used to be common enough.

Because there was no birth control

No one wants 13 kids unless they are mentally ill

I grew up in a town where the average was 10 kids those mothers were forced to have those kids. 1960s Long Islabd Catholic dysfunctional homes physical abuse DV was common