Meghan Markle thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like we should all care about misogynoir. But you do you.

Unless it's Republican women.

MAGA women have been subject to a years-long racist hate campaign? Well knock me over with a stick.

We have all seen the racism directed towards Winsome Sears ever since she entered politics.

The OP of this thread sounds like Meghan’s PR team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like we should all care about misogynoir. But you do you.

Unless it's Republican women.

MAGA women have been subject to a years-long racist hate campaign? Well knock me over with a stick.

We have all seen the racism directed towards Winsome Sears ever since she entered politics.

The OP of this thread sounds like Meghan’s PR team.

Why do you keep repeating the nonsense about Meghan's PR time on the original thread and here? Surprise, some people actually like or admire Meghan as a businesswoman or fashion icon. Sit with that for a while and try to learn to live with it.

Also, as I posted on the other thread when you said the same thing, Meghan's PR team is in defense mode. It's William and Kate’s pr team who are notorious for controlling the royal rota (basically, the British press pack) by threatening to withhold access, and for spreading hate about Meghan whenever they need a deflection from things like Andrew’s latest scandal. Also, the Waleses deploy thousands of comments and upvote bots daily (Google “New York Times A Royal Instagram Mystery” for a quantitative analysis of the Waleses' social media). You're the tool here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like we should all care about misogynoir. But you do you.

Unless it's Republican women.

MAGA women have been subject to a years-long racist hate campaign? Well knock me over with a stick.

We have all seen the racism directed towards Winsome Sears ever since she entered politics.

The OP of this thread sounds like Meghan’s PR team.

I'm OP and I'm not on Meghan's PR team, in any way paid by her, or a bot. Geez, you playground bullies are immature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like we should all care about misogynoir. But you do you.

Unless it's Republican women.

MAGA women have been subject to a years-long racist hate campaign? Well knock me over with a stick.

We have all seen the racism directed towards Winsome Sears ever since she entered politics.

The OP of this thread sounds like Meghan’s PR team.

Why do you keep repeating the nonsense about Meghan's PR time on the original thread and here? Surprise, some people actually like or admire Meghan as a businesswoman or fashion icon. Sit with that for a while and try to learn to live with it.

Also, as I posted on the other thread when you said the same thing, Meghan's PR team is in defense mode. It's William and Kate’s pr team who are notorious for controlling the royal rota (basically, the British press pack) by threatening to withhold access, and for spreading hate about Meghan whenever they need a deflection from things like Andrew’s latest scandal. Also, the Waleses deploy thousands of comments and upvote bots daily (Google “New York Times A Royal Instagram Mystery” for a quantitative analysis of the Waleses' social media). You're the tool here.

I’m not in the other thread. Have them check the IPs.

I don’t care about the BRF but I do care about speech. Wealthy public figures don’t get to silence free speech because people say mean comments they don’t like. I don’t care if it’s King Charles or Megan Markle. Go ahead and make a new thread trashing Charles or William.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like we should all care about misogynoir. But you do you.

Unless it's Republican women.

MAGA women have been subject to a years-long racist hate campaign? Well knock me over with a stick.

We have all seen the racism directed towards Winsome Sears ever since she entered politics.

The OP of this thread sounds like Meghan’s PR team.

Why do you keep repeating the nonsense about Meghan's PR time on the original thread and here? Surprise, some people actually like or admire Meghan as a businesswoman or fashion icon. Sit with that for a while and try to learn to live with it.

Also, as I posted on the other thread when you said the same thing, Meghan's PR team is in defense mode. It's William and Kate’s pr team who are notorious for controlling the royal rota (basically, the British press pack) by threatening to withhold access, and for spreading hate about Meghan whenever they need a deflection from things like Andrew’s latest scandal. Also, the Waleses deploy thousands of comments and upvote bots daily (Google “New York Times A Royal Instagram Mystery” for a quantitative analysis of the Waleses' social media). You're the tool here.

I’m not in the other thread. Have them check the IPs.

I don’t care about the BRF but I do care about speech. Wealthy public figures don’t get to silence free speech because people say mean comments they don’t like. I don’t care if it’s King Charles or Megan Markle. Go ahead and make a new thread trashing Charles or William.

Agree people should be free to say stupid things about PR. But don’t agree that people should be free to post hate speech, and there’s someone in the Meghan thread who’s gloating that she spends her days looking for mean things from totally unreliable sources about Meghan, such as hate podcasts and the Daily Mail, so she can spread these lies and distortions on social media and DCUM and get more people to hate Meghan. It’s pretty vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like we should all care about misogynoir. But you do you.

Unless it's Republican women.

MAGA women have been subject to a years-long racist hate campaign? Well knock me over with a stick.

We have all seen the racism directed towards Winsome Sears ever since she entered politics.

The OP of this thread sounds like Meghan’s PR team.

Why do you keep repeating the nonsense about Meghan's PR time on the original thread and here? Surprise, some people actually like or admire Meghan as a businesswoman or fashion icon. Sit with that for a while and try to learn to live with it.

Also, as I posted on the other thread when you said the same thing, Meghan's PR team is in defense mode. It's William and Kate’s pr team who are notorious for controlling the royal rota (basically, the British press pack) by threatening to withhold access, and for spreading hate about Meghan whenever they need a deflection from things like Andrew’s latest scandal. Also, the Waleses deploy thousands of comments and upvote bots daily (Google “New York Times A Royal Instagram Mystery” for a quantitative analysis of the Waleses' social media). You're the tool here.

I’m not in the other thread. Have them check the IPs.

I don’t care about the BRF but I do care about speech. Wealthy public figures don’t get to silence free speech because people say mean comments they don’t like. I don’t care if it’s King Charles or Megan Markle. Go ahead and make a new thread trashing Charles or William.

Agree people should be free to say stupid things about PR. But don’t agree that people should be free to post hate speech, and there’s someone in the Meghan thread who’s gloating that she spends her days looking for mean things from totally unreliable sources about Meghan, such as hate podcasts and the Daily Mail, so she can spread these lies and distortions on social media and DCUM and get more people to hate Meghan. It’s pretty vile.

You are advocating for a completely unhinged censorship regime if you want to call some catty comments about chicken legs "hate speech." Please try to come back down to earth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are taking this waaaay too personally. Ever seen the Jen Hatmaker thread? It is at 870 pages!!! Perhaps your outrage should be directed there?

Relax about Meghan Markle and her thread. I promise you, she doesn't read the thread and wouldn't care. You are expending needless emotional energy on this.

I’m not the one spending my days reading Meghan hate subreddits and then rushing over to a mom’s website to regurgitate the bile….

I think you are responding to me? I didn’t read the thread nor do I follow her. I don’t care about the monarchy or the Kardashians, for that matter. But you need to get help with your extreme parasocial relationship.

[Anonymous]

There have been many threads on here about individual women. One that was all about Melania and her body and how she dresses and other Trump related women. Others about Hilaria, Jolie, Paltrow, Aniston, and various other influencers and celebs etc.

And whoever posted that MM thread to start with wanted it to be all about her body. The first comment was - she looks amazing - because she is skinnier than she was before. It was a critique of her body from post 1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like we should all care about misogynoir. But you do you.

Unless it's Republican women.

MAGA women have been subject to a years-long racist hate campaign? Well knock me over with a stick.

We have all seen the racism directed towards Winsome Sears ever since she entered politics.

The OP of this thread sounds like Meghan’s PR team.

Why do you keep repeating the nonsense about Meghan's PR time on the original thread and here? Surprise, some people actually like or admire Meghan as a businesswoman or fashion icon. Sit with that for a while and try to learn to live with it.

Also, as I posted on the other thread when you said the same thing, Meghan's PR team is in defense mode. It's William and Kate’s pr team who are notorious for controlling the royal rota (basically, the British press pack) by threatening to withhold access, and for spreading hate about Meghan whenever they need a deflection from things like Andrew’s latest scandal. Also, the Waleses deploy thousands of comments and upvote bots daily (Google “New York Times A Royal Instagram Mystery” for a quantitative analysis of the Waleses' social media). You're the tool here.

I’m not in the other thread. Have them check the IPs.

I don’t care about the BRF but I do care about speech. Wealthy public figures don’t get to silence free speech because people say mean comments they don’t like. I don’t care if it’s King Charles or Megan Markle. Go ahead and make a new thread trashing Charles or William.

Agree people should be free to say stupid things about PR. But don’t agree that people should be free to post hate speech, and there’s someone in the Meghan thread who’s gloating that she spends her days looking for mean things from totally unreliable sources about Meghan, such as hate podcasts and the Daily Mail, so she can spread these lies and distortions on social media and DCUM and get more people to hate Meghan. It’s pretty vile.

You are advocating for a completely unhinged censorship regime if you want to call some catty comments about chicken legs "hate speech." Please try to come back down to earth.

So you support online bullying, got it. You're fine with people like that poster who says she spends her days trawling for mean things and lies to spread about Meghan on places like DCUM, got it. Meghan is perhaps the most bullied woman in the world and you're OK with that, got it.

Pat yourself on the back? I mean, I found her show cringe, but online bullying is going to bring down more than just Meghan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There have been many threads on here about individual women. One that was all about Melania and her body and how she dresses and other Trump related women. Others about Hilaria, Jolie, Paltrow, Aniston, and various other influencers and celebs etc.

And whoever posted that MM thread to start with wanted it to be all about her body. The first comment was - she looks amazing - because she is skinnier than she was before. It was a critique of her body from post 1.

Liar. Here's the OP in total: "She looks amazing! What kind of diet and exercise routine does she have?"

OP said nothing about her being skinnier than ever before. In fact that OP specifically asks about exercise, so that OP apparently thinks she looks fit and well-muscled, not "skinny." I've lost even more respect for you, if that's possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been many threads on here about individual women. One that was all about Melania and her body and how she dresses and other Trump related women. Others about Hilaria, Jolie, Paltrow, Aniston, and various other influencers and celebs etc.

And whoever posted that MM thread to start with wanted it to be all about her body. The first comment was - she looks amazing - because she is skinnier than she was before. It was a critique of her body from post 1.

Liar. Here's the OP in total: "She looks amazing! What kind of diet and exercise routine does she have?"

OP said nothing about her being skinnier than ever before. In fact that OP specifically asks about exercise, so that OP apparently thinks she looks fit and well-muscled, not "skinny." I've lost even more respect for you, if that's possible.

You can see in pictures that she is thinner than she was. So yes, that is what was amazing. She doesn't have any noticeable increase in muscle mass. The comment was about critiquing her body.

[Anonymous]

Like it or not, people have opinions about her that are different from yours. Maybe we have more information, maybe we don’t.
By continually putting herself in the forefront and making her life so very public, she invites criticism. It’s a choice. Just another influencer in your face.
For the actual BRF, it is not a choice. She left that life and that family.
Tolerance is key. We can agree to disagree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been many threads on here about individual women. One that was all about Melania and her body and how she dresses and other Trump related women. Others about Hilaria, Jolie, Paltrow, Aniston, and various other influencers and celebs etc.

And whoever posted that MM thread to start with wanted it to be all about her body. The first comment was - she looks amazing - because she is skinnier than she was before. It was a critique of her body from post 1.

Liar. Here's the OP in total: "She looks amazing! What kind of diet and exercise routine does she have?"

OP said nothing about her being skinnier than ever before. In fact that OP specifically asks about exercise, so that OP apparently thinks she looks fit and well-muscled, not "skinny." I've lost even more respect for you, if that's possible.

You can see in pictures that she is thinner than she was. So yes, that is what was amazing. She doesn't have any noticeable increase in muscle mass. The comment was about critiquing her body.

OP didn't provide pictures. She provided that single sentence. Again, OP didn't start a thread to critique Meghan's body. You lot sure piled on about it, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are taking this waaaay too personally. Ever seen the Jen Hatmaker thread? It is at 870 pages!!! Perhaps your outrage should be directed there?

Relax about Meghan Markle and her thread. I promise you, she doesn't read the thread and wouldn't care. You are expending needless emotional energy on this.

I’m not the one spending my days reading Meghan hate subreddits and then rushing over to a mom’s website to regurgitate the bile….

I think you are responding to me? I didn’t read the thread nor do I follow her. I don’t care about the monarchy or the Kardashians, for that matter. But you need to get help with your extreme parasocial relationship.

The person with the parasocial relationship is the poster in that thread who says she spends an hour every evening before dinner scrolling through hate posts about Meghan so she can repost them on DCUM.

If you can't recognize bullying even when the bully admits it, you're beyond help. Carry on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been many threads on here about individual women. One that was all about Melania and her body and how she dresses and other Trump related women. Others about Hilaria, Jolie, Paltrow, Aniston, and various other influencers and celebs etc.

And whoever posted that MM thread to start with wanted it to be all about her body. The first comment was - she looks amazing - because she is skinnier than she was before. It was a critique of her body from post 1.

Liar. Here's the OP in total: "She looks amazing! What kind of diet and exercise routine does she have?"

OP said nothing about her being skinnier than ever before. In fact that OP specifically asks about exercise, so that OP apparently thinks she looks fit and well-muscled, not "skinny." I've lost even more respect for you, if that's possible.

You can see in pictures that she is thinner than she was. So yes, that is what was amazing. She doesn't have any noticeable increase in muscle mass. The comment was about critiquing her body.

OP didn't provide pictures. She provided that single sentence. Again, OP didn't start a thread to critique Meghan's body. You lot sure piled on about it, though.

She looks amazing is a critique. She is scrutinizing her body and her perspective is that what she sees is amazing,other people see it differently. And I didn't pile on. I didn't even post in that thread.