They should have done a full boundary study for the whole system from ES to HS. It's not like they didn't know this opportunity would come. |
They were too busy paying McKnight $1m not to work |
How come the Superintendent’s Recommended FY 2027 Capital Budget and the FY 2027–2032 Capital Improvements Program says Ashburton is not overcrowded? It seems to indicate Ashburton is just at capacity. |
I have no idea why they don’t view Ashburton as overcrowded. We currently have around 900 students. The building is only supposed to accommodate 677. Then portables were added in 2019 which brought that capacity up to 780. The entire 5th grade is now in portables. There are only 90 before/aftercare spots in the program onsite so every working parent who doesn’t get a spot has to pay an extra ~$2k a year to use offsite programs. Some kids have to eat lunch as early as 10:20 and others as late as 2:20. Because each grade is so large, they can’t accommodate more than one grade for lunch at the same time. This year our kids were offered automatic COSAs to Wyngate or Luxmanor in an effort to reduce enrollment at Ashburton. I don’t think many people took up the Luxmanor offer because it feeds into a different MS. I know people took up the Wyngate offer. I agree with PP. So much of the new MFH is being built in areas near the mall that are pretty much equidistant to Seven Locks. They should have rezoned everything at the same time. |
CIP claims Ashburton has a capacity of 820 and enrollment of 823. Smh MCPS! |
Sorry capacity of 823 and enrollment of 820 |
If they are going to skip the Crown boundary changes anyway, they should just push the Woodward changes back a year too and do it at the same time as the new elementary boundary study. That would let them push the program changes back a year too. |