Pseudo prestigious privates

[Anonymous]

WUSTL is an excellent school and significantly above most flagships, although it is a bit dumpy and lacks the panache of the ivy+. Same is true of Emory.

NYU is a world class school and you're showing your ass by even mentioning it here.

Surprised Tufts wasn't on the list though.

[Anonymous]

I think those are schools kids/families select because they really like them. They like the campus, the general vibe, the size, the weather, the setting. Sometimes they also like specific programs.

If the family can afford it (in some of these cases a star student can get real merit that would bring the cost of these down below a state flagship anyway) and the kid feels it's a good fit, why not?

I don't think anyone goes to these schools thinking it's "practically an Ivy!" They know what they are getting and actually want it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP is an ignorant moron. With a few exceptions, that list is comprised of fantastic schools that are incredibly hard to get into.

They’re not fantastic. They’re just not.

They all have a low acceptance rate, much lower than their corresponding state U. That was your comparison, not mine. So stop being a brazen liar.

For some families who can afford it, the more selective privates are completely worth it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor OP, so insecure and miserable that they need to go online picking fights with people and pretending to be Ivies or bust.

Sucks to be you, I guess.

Not Ivy or bust at all. Just saying that private school parents who can’t get their kids into Ivies tell themselves that these schools are great just because they’re private and expensive — but they’re not great. At all. Many state flagships are better, certainly the ones around here.

You're just talking out your backside if you don't back it up by numbers. And numbers say you're talking out of your backside.

[Anonymous]

So sad that you're looking for a DCUM fight on a Saturday Night. Couldn't even go to a bar and start a proper one, OP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP is an ignorant moron. With a few exceptions, that list is comprised of fantastic schools that are incredibly hard to get into.

They’re not fantastic. They’re just not.

They all have a low acceptance rate, much lower than their corresponding state U. That was your comparison, not mine. So stop being a brazen liar.

For some families who can afford it, the more selective privates are completely worth it.

Nope more selective privates are definitely not worth it. But you drink the kool aid and think they are worth it..

[Anonymous]

OP took the bait and decided to have this conversation with himself. He promised to go away and stop this incessant derailing of threads. So just keep starting new ones. SAD!

[Anonymous]

OP-No one is forcing you to send those kids to any of the schools. Send them to your state flagship. Send them to any Ivy or WASP. Send them to a little-known LAC. It’s your kid and your money. We online bystanders/observers will wish your kid well wherever their journey takes them.

[Anonymous]

never say prestigious and missouri in the same atmosphere

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one thinks BU is prestigious

Whether people view BU as prestigious or not, the school provides excellent education and experiences—even when compared to one of the top state schools. Some aspects are actually better at BU.

I have children attending both schools.

[Anonymous]

I can't afford these places so I'll dedicate my life to stalking dcum every time one of theses schools is even tangentially mentioned and I'll be sure to thread bully over and over and over to be sure you know that there's a less expensive 30,000+++ flagship alternative. I assume you haven't heard about or considered them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP-No one is forcing you to send those kids to any of the schools. Send them to your state flagship. Send them to any Ivy or WASP. Send them to a little-known LAC. It’s your kid and your money. We online bystanders/observers will wish your kid well wherever their journey takes them.

which makes it weirder that OP insists on trying to sling mud at your kid's choices. sad, really.

[Anonymous]

OP - It's a good thing we are not all alike in our views!

Maybe people are not chasing prestige but looking for a good fit, and maybe we have money saved up and are happy to send our kids to excellent schools where they would thrive?

It sounds like you sent your kid to a state flagship and are regretting that choice and taking it out on the other parents on this board.

[Anonymous]

BU and Tulane are nowhere near prestigious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BU and Tulane are nowhere near prestigious.

I'm sure you couldn't get in. 11 and 14% acceptance rates.

Maybe back in your dinosaur days, they weren't prestigious. But the world has changed and now they're very selective.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but really, OP is just wrong. These are all very selective institutions, whether you like them or not.