What schools are T-10?

[Anonymous]

Northeastern
Bucknell
Holy Cross
Old Dominion
Miami
Alabama
Ithaca
CW Post
High Point
Oberlin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Northeastern
Bucknell
Holy Cross
Old Dominion
Miami
Alabama
Ithaca
CW Post
High Point
Oberlin

Lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Williams is the top lac, I wouldn’t include LACs in the t10

williams is leagues ahead of amherst, pomona, swarthmore, bowdoin... what else would compete?

in terms of academic opportunities, faculty resources, caliber of student attending, post grad outcomes- williams is not only above all the lower ranked lacs, but up to par with the ivies

(obviously ignoring barnard which I functionally consider a school within columbia U)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We all know which schools are included in "Ivy."

We all know what schools are included in HYPMS.

So what are the maybe 2-3 schools not included in either of the above - if any? Cal Tech? What does T-10 even mean?

I’ll bite.

HYPSM
Caltech
WASP

There’s your 10!

Uchicago is better than Amherst.

UChicago is an ED2 app after Amherst (which has no ED2) denies your ED2 application. Not even sure UChicago is top 20 if you include SLACs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ivies, Stanford, MIT, Hopkins, Chicago, Rice, Vanderbilt, NW, Amherst, Williams all are contenders for T10.

Vanderbilt? Rice? C'mon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We all know which schools are included in "Ivy."

We all know what schools are included in HYPMS.

So what are the maybe 2-3 schools not included in either of the above - if any? Cal Tech? What does T-10 even mean?

I’ll bite.

HYPSM
Caltech
WASP

There’s your 10!

Uchicago is better than Amherst.

UChicago is an ED2 app after Amherst (which has no ED2) denies your ED2 application. Not even sure UChicago is top 20 if you include SLACs.

Any school that has ED2 should not be in contention. That also means Swarthmore, Rice and Hopkins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Williams is the top lac, I wouldn’t include LACs in the t10

williams is leagues ahead of amherst, pomona, swarthmore, bowdoin... what else would compete?

in terms of academic opportunities, faculty resources, caliber of student attending, post grad outcomes- williams is not only above all the lower ranked lacs, but up to par with the ivies

(obviously ignoring barnard which I functionally consider a school within columbia U)

Leagues is hilarious. Post grad outcomes? Not the best. Caliber of student attending? Not the best. Faculty resources? Maybe, not even sure how you’d measure that when these institutions aren’t research centers. Academic opportunities? Come on, one of its peers has access to 4 other liberal arts colleges for crying out loud!

The Claremont colleges are the strongest model. Pomona has the best resources, CMC has the highest earnings, Harvey Mudd has the best grad school outcomes across all LACs. Williams is wealthier than all of them, but it doesn’t have the most resources as a condition of being a college in the middle of nowhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Williams is the top lac, I wouldn’t include LACs in the t10

williams is leagues ahead of amherst, pomona, swarthmore, bowdoin... what else would compete?

in terms of academic opportunities, faculty resources, caliber of student attending, post grad outcomes- williams is not only above all the lower ranked lacs, but up to par with the ivies

(obviously ignoring barnard which I functionally consider a school within columbia U)

Glad your kid likes Williams but come on. The data does not support your claims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ivies, Stanford, MIT, Hopkins, Chicago, Rice, Vanderbilt, NW, Amherst, Williams all are contenders for T10.

You forgot Hopkins and Georgetown which are solidly in the top 10.

Georgetown? lol

It’s actually a way tougher admit than Chicago ED. Georgetown has no ED. But don’t see either as top10.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Williams is the top lac, I wouldn’t include LACs in the t10

williams is leagues ahead of amherst, pomona, swarthmore, bowdoin... what else would compete?

in terms of academic opportunities, faculty resources, caliber of student attending, post grad outcomes- williams is not only above all the lower ranked lacs, but up to par with the ivies

(obviously ignoring barnard which I functionally consider a school within columbia U)

Nowhere is this true. Williams definitely isn’t the lac with the best post grad outcomes, that’s blatantly false for both grad school admissions and industry results. Maybe you’re just speaking to finance?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Williams is the top lac, I wouldn’t include LACs in the t10

williams is leagues ahead of amherst, pomona, swarthmore, bowdoin... what else would compete?

in terms of academic opportunities, faculty resources, caliber of student attending, post grad outcomes- williams is not only above all the lower ranked lacs, but up to par with the ivies

(obviously ignoring barnard which I functionally consider a school within columbia U)

Leagues is hilarious. Post grad outcomes? Not the best. Caliber of student attending? Not the best. Faculty resources? Maybe, not even sure how you’d measure that when these institutions aren’t research centers. Academic opportunities? Come on, one of its peers has access to 4 other liberal arts colleges for crying out loud!

The Claremont colleges are the strongest model. Pomona has the best resources, CMC has the highest earnings, Harvey Mudd has the best grad school outcomes across all LACs. Williams is wealthier than all of them, but it doesn’t have the most resources as a condition of being a college in the middle of nowhere.

Williams is the strongest overall! Usnews loves it for a reason! I’m not even sure Pomona is a top lac, seems very flashy and new- ersatz at best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We all know which schools are included in "Ivy."

We all know what schools are included in HYPMS.

So what are the maybe 2-3 schools not included in either of the above - if any? Cal Tech? What does T-10 even mean?

I’ll bite.

HYPSM
Caltech
WASP

There’s your 10!

Uchicago is better than Amherst.

UChicago is an ED2 app after Amherst (which has no ED2) denies your ED2 application. Not even sure UChicago is top 20 if you include SLACs.

Any school that has ED2 should not be in contention. That also means Swarthmore, Rice and Hopkins.

Pretty much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We all know which schools are included in "Ivy."

We all know what schools are included in HYPMS.

So what are the maybe 2-3 schools not included in either of the above - if any? Cal Tech? What does T-10 even mean?

I’ll bite.

HYPSM
Caltech
WASP

There’s your 10!

Uchicago is better than Amherst.

UChicago is an ED2 app after Amherst (which has no ED2) denies your ED2 application. Not even sure UChicago is top 20 if you include SLACs.

Any school that has ED2 should not be in contention. That also means Swarthmore, Rice and Hopkins.

+1, also no schools with sub 50-60% yield.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Northeastern
Bucknell
Holy Cross
Old Dominion
Miami
Alabama
Ithaca
CW Post
High Point
Oberlin

Lollllllllllll

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We all know which schools are included in "Ivy."

We all know what schools are included in HYPMS.

So what are the maybe 2-3 schools not included in either of the above - if any? Cal Tech? What does T-10 even mean?

I’ll bite.

HYPSM
Caltech
WASP

There’s your 10!

Uchicago is better than Amherst.

UChicago is an ED2 app after Amherst (which has no ED2) denies your ED2 application. Not even sure UChicago is top 20 if you include SLACs.

Any school that has ED2 should not be in contention. That also means Swarthmore, Rice and Hopkins.[/quote

Ed2 , Ed1 , Ea who cares… look at QS field specific ranking and go from there