Given maga hell will be more crowded |
There would be no point in starting such a thread. If after hundreds of years the Catholic church in its pride and arrogance still peddles this belief of infant baptism, as it does selling indulgences, and the best theologians from both Protestant and Catholic are still arguing the issue, neither of us will produce The Magic Bullet to settle the issue once and for all. |
|
Lol.
We are constrained by the physical here. Not there. |
I mean ... the observable universe is more than big enough. Why wouldn't heaven be? |
good point. |
Are you so sure? Jesus' resurrected body was physical even if the laws of our current physical space didn't fully apply (walking through walls). God made us spiritual and physical beings. He clearly values the physical. I think there will still be physical constraints and have heard pretty smart people say the same. One of my professors at a Christian college used to argue that we'd miss people in heaven because they'd be far away and that would (somehow in his mind) be a good thing because it would be more about the anticipation of traveling to see them than about the sadness of currently not seeing them since we'd no longer have finite time. |
What if Mark was wrong and we all go to the same place? |
Notice you believe first THEN you are baptized This is true only for adult converts. But for the dependents of adult converts, Peter baptized the whole household, with the reasonable presumption that that included the children. Baptism is the sign of the new covenant, similar to how circumcision was the sign of the old covenant (Col. 2:11-12). Under the old covenant, circumcision was applied after profession of faith in converting adults, but then they in turn applied it to their (male) babies. Romans 4:10-11 discusses this with regard to Abraham: He believed first, then afterward received circumcision as a "sign" and "seal" of the righteous he had by faith while still uncircumcised. Nevertheless, he applied this sign to his children. In fact, applying the covenant sign to your children was to be done on pain of death, apparently, as Moses was nearly struck dead for neglecting to circumcise his children, but was saved by the intervention of his wife Zipporah. a baby cannot confess Jesus and is unable to believe at such a young age Not true. John the Baptist leapt in the womb at being in the near presence of Christ (Luke 1). Paul further clarifies that the children of believers are "holy" (1 Cor. 7:14). |
Have you seen the size of the Universe? |
No, pp said that some Christian views of Heaven come from Judaism, and other religions, too. Sounds plausible to me. |
![]() |
It gets funnier. The Creation story might be a Babylonian creation myth with a water dragon. https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/flqtze/the_bible_stoleborrowed_the_babylonian_creation/#:~:text=Tiamat%20%3D%20The%20primordial%20chaos%20in,deep'%20or%20'darkness'. I enjoyed telling that to a fundie in my college accounting class who tried to proselytize me because I said a swear word when I dropped something. |
What? Your BODY doesn't go there. Its a figure of speech about where your soul resides. The "space" is limitless and timeless. |
If you believe the part of Genesis where Abram was a Chaldean (a group intertwined with the Babylonians) is it really so confusing that the cultures would have intertwined stories? Or, stay with me here, the Babylonian creation myth might have been someone remembering a common story that was told because it was based on what really happened. If you're going to believe parts of Genesis, just go whole hog here. |