Link or date of presentation to BOE so that we can see it? They have danced around the issue of differential opportunity for local families for a very long time. Any questioning at the BOE tends to get deftly misdirected, and, sadly, without BOE redirection to the point. I wouldn't be surprised if this is an error in the presentation or that the 50/13 split isn't made clear from one slide to the next. An alternate explanation might be that they eliminated the local set-aside for the upcounty programs, but kept it for TPMS. TKPK isn't the only area getting special treatment. There are the local-school-only CES programs where, again, a student's chances of lottery selection are markedly higher than in for larger-catchment magnet CESs. (Shockingly, Piney Branch ES, serving TKPK, is one of those local-only ones, and used to start in 3rd grade before conforming to 4th/5th a few years ago -- vestiges still persist.) The Potomac ES Chinese immersion program is almost entirely drawn from the local school populatio. There may be a few others. |
I don't think the Piney Branch CES ever included third grade, but Takoma Park ES did until a few years ago include the only 1st/2nd grade gifted program in the county, and the benefits were available to all kids in the school who qualified. Some of that programming may have rolled over into PBES. |
The link to their October 21 presentation is embedded here: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/curriculum/specialprograms/middle |
At 5:39 in the English version |
Interesting. Downcounty version also says 125 out-of-bounds seats. There is no mention of local seats at all. Did MCPS mis-report this in the public overview? It isn't a report to the BOE. Did they increase the allotment from 100 to 125? Or is there a new paradigm of no local reserve in play this year? Again, they specifically call out out-of-bounds seats but make no mention of local-reserved seats. If they had done away with the latter, you'd think that they wouldn't term the former "out-of-bounds" -- they'd just be seats. Looking at one from 2 years earlier https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oz_WPSLH_J4 which is so similar that it is clear most of the video presentation is simply reused from year to year, the same slide for downcounty indicated 100 out of bounds seats. If I had to guess, it would be that they expanded the total size of the program, and that instead of their being 50 (upcounty) or 100 (downcounty) out-of-bounds seats per program there are 63 and 125, respectively, but that they maintained the reserves for the local school population. If that was the case, and assuming similar rates of identification, a TKMS-local student who was identified for the lottery would still have about 5 times the likelihood of being offered a seat as a similar out-of-bounds student. Any link for the presentation to local/in-bounds families for this year (or a prior one) that might clear this up? Or a report to the BOE? Much harder to rely on the canned presentations, here, given their limitations and the "FAQ" that is curated to avoid the kind of nuance that would raise inconvenient truths. |