I don’t believe this in one hundred years! How would you verify that? You are taking the for profit company’s word ? |
What incentive would they have to tell people their donor has cancer if it’s not true? |
You missed the point. A sibling parent reported it. Not the donor, suddenly. Think about what us more likely —and who is more likely to report.
Some give samples for the money. They are not tying themselves to an organization |
All of the donor subs are too young and all connected already. The donor was recently diagnosed and gave proof of date. I'm sure a lot wouldn't report |
But you also have to factor in the fact that you are depriving your existing child and (potentially) your hypothetical other offspring of a full genetic sibling—which could have its own implications for their health. Talk to a medical ethicist about this; don’t just take the sperm bank’s liability-minded advice. |
Will definitely chat with a geneticist and take in all considerations. TBH I don't think I can go through another cycle. We would just not grow our family. As is, we are unsure about the other two embryos and transfer and we were already waiting for baby to turn 1 to start talking or thinking about it. |
This makes no sense. No way to prove just because one sibling has HL that it came from th donor. It's not genetic and could very well have come from their mother or other factors. What is more likely is the donor was diagnosed much later in life than when he donated and did the right thing by self reporting |
My friend whose husband had a bone marrow transplant for something like this (not sure now whether it was lymphoma or leukemia) went ahead with having kids with his banked vials and IUI. Everybody is doing well right now. Dad in 50s and seems permanently cured. Kids are college age and healthy. |