This isn't taught in school anymore? SMH. |
What does this mean, exactly? Is there space in the curriculum for different teachers to come up with their own content, or do you just mean that some grade differently than others/give better feedback on written work? |
Some of this is very teacher specific as some teacher are better at teaching the basics than others. |
DC1 had much more work to do, including scaffolding assignments with the internal steps being graded, and much longer essays to much higher standards. I also think DC1 actually read and wrote a lot more than DC2. |
Pp here. Principal confirmed she is in the ELC pilot of Ckla |
It is in my fourth graders ELC. He knew about usual types of introductions and the structure of a paragraph. We are in the Einstein cluster - not sure if west county kids get the same. |
I think it is both. A crappy curriculum will mean that everyone will get something g bad. Benchmark was crappy. People wanted ELC because it was better than Benchmark. But yeah, teaching quality always matters. No curriculum will negate a bad teacher. |
This is absolutely taught. |
That is some spin. |
Wanting ELC because it’s not Benchmark is not the solution. And schools that used it as such shortchange either the on level kids or more likely the above/gifted kids that needed ELC. |
| Our school has ELC for all. |
Well, that problem is solved because MCPS finally got rid of Benchmark. Now they have a much better curriculum, so I think there will be fewer parents pushing to get into ELC just to escape a bad curriculum. Frankly, I trust Amplify more than ELC. Amplify is extrenally created. ELC came from MCPS. |
ELC uses units/content that is externally created from Junior Great Books and from the William & Mary Center for Gifted Education. https://education.wm.edu/centers/cfge/curriculum/languagearts/materials/ https://www.greatbooks.org/k-5-features/ |