| How is this any different than letting your house be used for a fund raiser or other party. We all know that there is an unofficial list of "event" homes in the area. I would assume that the owners are being compensated. But just because they don't use an app that kind of rental is OK and overlooked? |
|
|
Swimply's insurance is not great. Looked into it--it wouldn't cover us in several scenarios. Whether it may work for you will depend on your assets, what the basis of the lawsuit is, and how much they are suing for,
Thinking about what Swimply renters in need of a bathroom do is enough for those who don't have an outdoor accessible restroom to rule it out, not to mention potential liability. |
For one, your house has a bathroom in it. Most Swimply rentals do not include access to your home. Think about where they use the restroom. The liability risk is another difference. No thanks. |
Feels quite different. Does this activity occur outdoors, all day, everyday for months? |
Short rental rental houses typically are licensed and taxed on an annual basis. The people renting out their pools are getting around that, and their neighbors are pissed. That said, the neighbors would not be complaining if it was them raking in the extra money. |
It's two different questions, though. 1. Would you, as a homeowner with a pool, use Swimply to rent out your pool? 2. Under what circumstances should it be legal for owners of houses with pools to rent out the pool? |
Wouldn't you get pool house access? |
Only the richest people tend to have a "pool house" and most them wouldn't bother renting their pool. |
Know what would be truly awful? If the homeowner sold his/her home to a drug rehab for teens, which are allowed in residential communities. That's exactly what I would do. |
|