Yes: solid wood, site finished is the way to go. Twenty, thirty, forty, a hundred years from now those floors could still be in place. |
Yup, agree with most of what you said, although I think small bevel prefinished is fine in a $2M home. |
|
We just completed a large renovation of a 1930s house and put in all new hardwood. White oak, "select", 2 and a quarter inch wide, Bona natural finish. Finished on site after installation.
One recent trend is wide plank. I'm not a huge fan, but you do see that a lot now. |
This is the way to go. Engineered hardwood is going to look cheap and dated now and especially in twenty years. |
You did the right thing. You want something in conversation with the real age of the home. |
My kid works here. You'd be shocked at how cheaply they build their homes for the price they sell them. There's a reason their stock is so high. |
It's a trend, that's the problem. Just like the narrow plank was a big trend years ago. Best to go with a standard width, like the ones you see in homes from 100 and 50 years ago. Timeless. |
That’s not what timeless means!! Arrgggggg |
| +1 to everyone above saying real hardwood and ideally finish in place. White oak, or red, with a medium satin stain like Minwax espresso or dark walnut. |
| LVP is great for basements and beach houses. |
| I love my luxury vinyl floors in my house but it was put in due being on concrete slabs throughout and for cost. In your home you should put in hardwood. Not engineered flooring. |
| I would get a second opinion to make sure the originals can’t be refinished again. Original is best. Next, real wood done in place. |
| We are looking at houses in the $1.3M - $1.6M range and LVP is everywhere-- it's shocking. |