Who do you think is more delusional about who’s “in their league”? Men or women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Actually, you are wrong about my responses to him. I would simply offer him to be friends until he drops weight. Some men prefer to stick around in woman’s orbit to get a chance. Others don’t

No. A man does not orbit.

He shoots his shot and moves on if it does not work out.

No, rejected men (“alpha “ type in particular that’s not used to rejection) get surprised, request detailed explanation why you can’t be with them etc. I’m always frank why : you need to drop weight before I can join you on that trio in France you bragged about; I’m not ready for intimacy because you have a gut; you are an ass-e because you don’t tip and scream at service workers.

I can go on

[Anonymous]

Women, but it’s men’s fault. The advent of dating apps and the fact that men swipe way too frequently has given women a sense of desirability beyond their station.

[Anonymous]

No, rejected men (“alpha “ type in particular that’s not used to rejection) get surprised, request detailed explanation why you can’t be with them etc. I’m always frank why : you need to drop weight before I can join you on that trio in France you bragged about; I’m not ready for intimacy because you have a gut; you are an ass-e because you don’t tip and scream at service workers.

I can go on

Labels such as "alpha men" are stupid. A man either has enough self-esteem to avoid any of the begging noted in your post, or he does not.

You seem to attract men who lack self-esteem.

[Anonymous]

DCUM women hands down!

[Anonymous]

I don't think either group is "delusional." Rather as the necessity of being married to survive and and have a decent life has declined, both sexes have elevated their standards. If you can be happy or "kind of" happy single Why settle with someone who isn't your dream mate?

[Anonymous]

Women and men outside of the top 20%, if they want relationships will have to tolerate their partners.

Only the top 20% get true love